Sure...but 99.9999% of death row inmates make application to SCOTUS for staying their executions....and there are SIX Catholics on the Court, yet they don't permanently stay these executions or, for that matter, rule them unconstitutional.
SCOTUS is limited by the Constitition in that area. Biden is not required by the Constitution to facilitate mail-order abortions and openly oppose the doctrine of the Catholic Church.
Appeal to ignorance fallacy. The fact that you are unaware of something does not then mean that it did not exist.
Why does the Constitution LIMIT the Catholic Judges, but not the Catholic President???
MSNBC is one of the most credible sources of news. Fox admitted to rampant lying in court, lawyers have argued that no one in their right mind could possibly take what they say seriously.
I see. So there was radio, TV and the internet in the 1800s?
How's that Russian collusion and insurrection coming along?
Because the President’s grave heresy is the consequence of his own free will not a product of Constitutional constraints.
Don't the Catholic Justices have "free will" too?? Can't they refuse to sit on death penalty cases? If they were TRUE Catholics, adhering strictly to the Catechism they should say "no, we're not going to participate in this machinery of death -- we're done." And, if they started staying ALL executions....because they have "free will" to do that too what could be done to stop 'em?
Again, the difference is the Constitutional constraints. The death penalty is allowed by the Constitution and SCOTUS is not empowered to undo that wholesale. It did what it could in 2005. Biden is not required by the Constitution to take grave heretical positions and actions on the issue of abortion - he does so purely of his own free will.
There is no objective support for this ^ language.
Our Constitution (BOR) guarantees Biden’s right to voice his opinion on abortion, same as it guarantees your right to speak out against abortion.
That is blatantly false.
Well those are the magas
Run with the Fox News narrative. The Russian collusion happened. As did the insurrection. You're pathetic. Denials notwithstanding. It must suck to be an occult
Is this book both New & Old testaments? I mean He loves them both equally.
Nothing to do with Fox News. The Mueller report said there was no Russian collusion and the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that Donald Trump can only be found guilty of insurrection by congress.
Bullshit. That is truly the Fox News narrative. The Mueller report said no such thing.
www.politico.eu
And again a false conclusion. They just bounced it back to Congress. Don't you get tired of lying for that piece of s*** Trump?
No collusion.Bullshit. That is truly the Fox News narrative. The Mueller report said no such thing.
“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.
“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line
‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’
And again a false conclusion. They just bounced it back to Congress. Don't you get tired of lying for that piece of s*** Trump?
