• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump is selling $60 Bibles as he seeks funds for for campaign, legal bills

Nothing to do with Fox News. The Mueller report said there was no Russian collusion and the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that Donald Trump can only be found guilty of insurrection by congress.

And in other news that isn't a sad attempt at diversion...

"Donald Trump is selling $60 Bibles as he seeks funds for campaing, legal bills." :D
 
Bullshit. That is truly the Fox News narrative. The Mueller report said no such thing.
“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”



And again a false conclusion. They just bounced it back to Congress. Don't you get tired of lying for that piece of s*** Trump?
I haven't lied. The Constitution says only congress can determine who is an insurrectionist and you just agreed with me. Your false accusations aren't working.
 
No collusion.
We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Reading is fundamental.
 
I haven't lied. The Constitution says only congress can determine who is an insurrectionist and you just agreed with me. Your false accusations aren't working.

And in other news that isn't a sad attempt at diversion...

"Donald Trump is selling $60 Bibles as he seeks funds for campaing, legal bills." :D
 
There was scathing political satire and commentary that dug deep into personal corruption. These people weren't blind. ;)
I agree. However, there sure wasn't the constant barrage of political propaganda that we have today.
 
We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Reading is fundamental.
If reading is fundamental, then read my link.
 
I agree. However, there sure wasn't the constant barrage of political propaganda that we have today.

But it was sure as heck out there. We'd have an indication if Honest Abe and the others you mentioned had paid off sex workers, committed bank fraud for decades, filed bankruptcy multiple times, slimed their way out of debts for pennies on the dollar over and over again, had had multiple divorces, had engaged in grift after grift, and had compared themselves to Jesus.

So again...your comparison to "but Abe Lincoln and Thomas Edison failed before they succeeded!" just falls flat as pi** on a plate, as my Daddy used to say, LOL.
 
But it was sure as heck out there. We'd have an indication if Honest Abe and the others you mentioned had paid off sex workers, committed bank fraud for decades, filed bankruptcy multiple times, slimed their way out of debts for pennies on the dollar over and over again, had had multiple divorces, had engaged in grift after grift, and had compared themselves to Jesus.

So again...your comparison to "but Abe Lincoln and Thomas Edison failed before they succeeded!" just falls flat as pi** on a plate, as my Daddy used to say, LOL.
No bankers ever accused Trump of fraud. You're making my point about the constant barrage of political propaganda.
 
No bankers ever accused Trump of fraud. You're making my point about the constant barrage of political propaganda.

You forget that banks fired him, LOL.

Observation is not propaganda. Attempting to shut up observers is not anti-propaganda. It's the old-time equivalent of Trump's hooker hush-money. Except more threatening, LOL.

Meanwhile, in other news...

Trump is selling $60 Bibles as he seeks funds for campaign, legal bills. :D
 
A court found that he committed fraud.

Fact.

He knows, he's just attempting to derail the thread from the embarrassment of this anti-Christian nightmare profiting off Bible royalties to fight charges for paying off a porn star and defrauding banks, LOL.
 
You forget that banks fired him, LOL.

Observation is not propaganda. Attempting to shut up observers is not anti-propaganda. It's the old-time equivalent of Trump's hooker hush-money.
I'll be voting for Trump. He's going to fix the border and deport illegals. That's what I want. The other crap doesn't matter to me.
 
A kangaroo court. It's being appealed, which means it isn't over.
No a real court that followed American law, in which Trump had representation and was given due process.

He lost because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.

Quit with the conspiracy theories
 
I'll be voting for Trump. He's going to fix the border and deport illegals. That's what I want. The other crap doesn't matter to me.

I'll be voting for Biden, he fixes the economy and he doesn't pay off legal bills incurred by crimes with royalties from Bibles, LOL.
 
No a real court that followed American law, in which Trump had representation and was given due process.

He lost because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.

Quit with the conspiracy theories
We disagree. The appeal will decide if you're right or I'm right.
 
And in other news that isn't a sad attempt at diversion...

"Donald Trump is selling $60 Bibles as he seeks funds for campaing, legal bills." :D

I read that he won't being enriching his campaign with any of the profits.
 
The link goes to a paywall.

Look again. The quotes are there from the Washington Post. Pay more attention to the details. Not sure how you could have missed them.
 
Look again. The quotes are there from the Washington Post. Pay more attention to the details. Not sure how you could have missed them.
The current website for the book includes an FAQ that addresses the question of how the former president benefits from the partnership. It assures visitors that no money from the sale of the Bibles will go to Trump’s political campaign. Instead, “GodBlessTheUSABible.com uses Donald J. Trump’s name, likeness and image under paid license from CIC Ventures LLC, which license may be terminated or revoked according to its terms.”


CIC Ventures, though, is a conduit to Trump — personally, if not politically. In his financial disclosure released last year, he’s identified as the company’s “manager, president, secretary and treasurer” and the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust is identified as a 100 percent owner of the business. The same entity also receives royalties from his book “A MAGA Journey” and speaking engagements.
A person familiar with the agreement confirmed to the New York Times that Trump earns royalties from purchases.
 
Back
Top Bottom