• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. deficit spikes 42% in 1st Q of fiscal year

So you have no clue what a deficit is?
Go back to school your silly liberal
What a dumb ass statement trying to divert from your own ignorance. Seeking attention? Typical liberal

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Backed it up you replied with some BS that had nothing to do with the post in typical liberal fashion.
Post the link to your supposed response

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
What a dumb ass statement trying to divert from your own ignorance. Seeking attention? Typical liberal

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Talking about yourself now
 
Post 109 my illiterate commie friend

Post 112 is the response, never did I say the deficits were getting smaller only that context matters and you have offered none, how much was the 2018 deficit and what is the context of that data? 2018 was Trump's first budget year and unlike you with your support for liberalism I will hold him accountable for the results at the end of his term not just after his first budget year.

What I find disturbing is the constant attacks on the so called Trump deficit without context or discussion of the actions he has taken that he controls, things like the executive branch budget, the 2019 budget proposals, the economic policies leading to economic growth and good job creation, not stagnant growth and part time jobs for economic reasons.

You seem to want attention but all you are showing is your ignorance of the subject
 
And here is the basic problem with your argument, you look at the numbers and claim the numbers show how bad the recession was and focus solely on those numbers never looking at the economic policies that generated those numbers and the worst recovery in history due to lack of understanding that Obama and most liberals have regarding the economy. The worst recovery from a recession in U.S. history is represented in the numbers and the economic policies that generated those numbers

The broken record returns. Aggregate demand shrinks due to near collapse of entire worldwide banking system. Millions lose their jobs quickly, tax revenues drop creating massive deficits instantly. Conservative then deflects to some gibberish that makes the idiotic premise that spending was the result of bad decisions made by Obama but he says absolutely nothing more then "Obama did it". Perhaps your opinion was for Obama to cut everything across the board to match tax revenues? Your econ chops are sadly pathetic. You sir are really a piece of work.
 
The broken record returns. Aggregate demand shrinks due to near collapse of entire worldwide banking system. Millions lose their jobs quickly, tax revenues drop creating massive deficits instantly. Conservative then deflects to some gibberish that makes the idiotic premise that spending was the result of bad decisions made by Obama but he says absolutely nothing more then "Obama did it". Perhaps your opinion was for Obama to cut everything across the board to match tax revenues? Your econ chops are sadly pathetic. You sir are really a piece of work.

The recession was from December 2007 to June 2009 with most of the damage done in 2008 and the banking system was saved by TARP, what exactly did Obama do to assist in the recovery, implement a stimulus program almost day one that saw employment go down 4 million in 2009 and only recover 1 million in 2010. The worst economic policies and results from a recession in history. How long are you going to make excuses for failure and ignore actual positive economic results and job creation?

We do not have an economy dependent like the rest of the world on gov't spending even though that appears to be what you want. Obama didn't understand the private sector, never ran anything in his life, had no business or executive experience and this results show that. He implemented a stimulus program that failed to created the promised jobs and when it failed rather than correct the mistakes made he went on to ACA. that is incompetence and your support of that incompetence is on full display
 
Post 112 is the response, never did I say the deficits were getting smaller only that context matters and you have offered none, how much was the 2018 deficit and what is the context of that data? 2018 was Trump's first budget year and unlike you with your support for liberalism I will hold him accountable for the results at the end of his term not just after his first budget year.

What I find disturbing is the constant attacks on the so called Trump deficit without context or discussion of the actions he has taken that he controls, things like the executive branch budget, the 2019 budget proposals, the economic policies leading to economic growth and good job creation, not stagnant growth and part time jobs for economic reasons.

You seem to want attention but all you are showing is your ignorance of the subject

Ironic from a liberal who calls himself conservative.
Nothing your have said even comes close to refuting the claim that the problem with trumpenomics is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples money

Now before you respond with some inane off topic nonsense go to school and learn what a deficit is.
 
Ironic from a liberal who calls himself conservative.
Nothing your have said even comes close to refuting the claim that the problem with trumpenomics is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples money

Now before you respond with some inane off topic nonsense go to school and learn what a deficit is.

Your problem is reading comprehension and an inability to post official data supporting your claim, just because deficits rise doesn't mean it is due to discretionary spending increases or the fault of Trump. There is nothing conservative in your posts as it appears you don't even understand the term. This is all about hating Trump and being blinded by that hatred because of his personality.
 
Your problem is reading comprehension and an inability to post official data supporting your claim, just because deficits rise doesn't mean it is due to discretionary spending increases or the fault of Trump. There is nothing conservative in your posts as it appears you don't even understand the term. This is all about hating Trump and being blinded by that hatred because of his personality.
No this is all about you loving trump and ignoring that he is increasing te deficit every year. He is spending other peoples money and sooner or you run out of other peoples money

Do you even know what a deficit is?
 
So you are claiming the deficits are getting smaller under Trump? Is that the rope you are going to sling around your neck?
Ok then
View attachment 67251405
United States federal budget - Wikipedia
Deficit by Year: Compared to GDP, Debt, and Events
Budget and Economic Data | Congressional Budget Office
US Federal Deficit by Year - plus charts and analysis

There ya go my liberal friend

It is truly amazing how radicals like you point to PROJECTED deficits as factual all to promote an agenda filled with hate and socialism. Projected deficits mean nothing as proven during the Obama Administration as actual economic activity is ignored, under Obama it was stagnant leading to higher actual deficits than projected and under Trump they will be lower due to actual economic activities. Promoting PROJECTIONS as actual does nothing for your credibility thus making your posts nothing but partisan blather
 
No this is all about you loving trump and ignoring that he is increasing te deficit every year. He is spending other peoples money and sooner or you run out of other peoples money

Do you even know what a deficit is?

You again are pointing to PROJECTIONS, do you understand what a PROJECTION is? What makes those PROJECTIONS accurate, your ideology and wanting them to be accurate?

We are seeing Blue states like NY running out of other people's money to spend and that is liberalism not any conservative reality
 
God damned Obama!

How about posting how much that 42% increase in first qtr, fiscal year 2019, October 2018 to December 2018 is in dollars? Also can you explain to us what constitutes that dollar increase in deficit? You see the bottom line looks negative but context matters so I welcome you posting that context?

Are you telling me now that after 8 years of Obama deficits adding up to 9.3 trillion dollars that all of a sudden deficits matter to you? Tell me which Democratic Candidate you support and what they are going to do about the deficit and debt?
 
How about posting how much that 42% increase in first qtr, fiscal year 2019, October 2018 to December 2018 is in dollars? Also can you explain to us what constitutes that dollar increase in deficit? You see the bottom line looks negative but context matters so I welcome you posting that context?

Are you telling me now that after 8 years of Obama deficits adding up to 9.3 trillion dollars that all of a sudden deficits matter to you? Tell me which Democratic Candidate you support and what they are going to do about the deficit and debt?

I cared about the debt Obama added too. But we do not have a fiscally responsible party in this country, so all we can do is add debt. You're only defense is "but...but....but......Obama"

lol

typical hyperpartisan.
 
I cared about the debt Obama added too. But we do not have a fiscally responsible party in this country, so all we can do is add debt. You're only defense is "but...but....but......Obama"

lol

typical hyperpartisan.

I asked you a specific question about context, but you do what all radicals do, ignored it and changed the subject. Answer the question posed
 
I asked you a specific question about context, but you do what all radicals do, ignored it and changed the subject. Answer the question posed

42% is 42% yes...up and up and up. I know that you have to do somersaults to try to make it not seem as bad. But Trump has added significantly to the deficit, even when the "party of fiscal responsibility". If you care enough to post all those numbers and pretend that Trump isn't contributing significantly to the deficit, that's cool. But he his, and neither party seems interested in fixing it; just pointing fingers.

lol
 
42% is 42% yes...up and up and up. I know that you have to do somersaults to try to make it not seem as bad. But Trump has added significantly to the deficit, even when the "party of fiscal responsibility". If you care enough to post all those numbers and pretend that Trump isn't contributing significantly to the deficit, that's cool. But he his, and neither party seems interested in fixing it; just pointing fingers.

lol
So 42% of what? Context and dollars not percentages

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
You again are pointing to PROJECTIONS, do you understand what a PROJECTION is? What makes those PROJECTIONS accurate, your ideology and wanting them to be accurate?

We are seeing Blue states like NY running out of other people's money to spend and that is liberalism not any conservative reality
Do you know what a deficit is?
 
Do you know what a deficit is?

Do you know what a Projection is?? What is the deficit for 2020, 2021,2022, 2023 in Post 109? For that matter what is the Deficit for 2019 when the fiscal year ends in September 2019?
 
Do you know what a Projection is?? What is the deficit for 2020, 2021,2022, 2023 in Post 109? For that matter what is the Deficit for 2019 when the fiscal year ends in September 2019?

Do you know what a deficit is?
Its a simple yes/no question
I ask because it appears from your posts (that never deal with what I am saying) that you do not
 
Back
Top Bottom