• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pelosi Warns of ‘New Stage’ of Inquiry if Trump Blocks Whistle-Blower Complaint

All your wishing and hoping opining doesn't change what I quoted above.
All your flailing and pretending to know what you're talking about, won't change the reality that you have zero understanding of the facts.
 
This argument is literally "Trump didn't do anything wrong ... BUT IF HE DID, SO WHAT?".

News flash: it doesn't have to be illegal to be impeachable at all. Congress is the arbiter of what constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor in executive power.

No. It is absolutely the reverse. Your argument touches on "He didn't anything wrong" but so what? Let's keep pretending.
Geeeeezzz! Has your gang decided yet if you are running a Communist or Socialist this outing?

Ha, ha, ha! See you in 2020!!!!

Regards,
CP
 
There are no criminal aspects at play here. If Trump asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden clan for alleged crimes in exchange for fubds, then one can make an abuse of power argument. Which is not a crime but can certainly be impeached over.
Then the Democrats can take responsibility and make the argument for impeachment.
We don't know there's nothing criminal in the phone call, until a third party sees a transcript, or a witness is allowed to testify.

Congress is entitled to information that can settle the issues, and the fact that the WH refuses to let them see the relevant conversation, is a great tell of how incriminating the conversation must be.
 
No. It is absolutely the reverse. Your argument touches on "He didn't anything wrong" but so what? Let's keep pretending.
Geeeeezzz! Has your gang decided yet if you are running a Communist or Socialist this outing?

Ha, ha, ha! See you in 2020!!!!

Regards,
CP
I see all you have left are daycare taunts and a releasing of your inner two year old.:2wave:
 
Schiff already stated this on TV.
Oh well its the Gospel then. Isn't he the same guy that said he had seen credible evidence of Trump colluding with Russia. How well did that work out. :lamo
 
There are no criminal aspects at play here. If Trump asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden clan for alleged crimes in exchange for fubds, then one can make an abuse of power argument. Which is not a crime but can certainly be impeached over.
Then the Democrats can take responsibility and make the argument for impeachment.


But that is not the issue. He threatened to hold back US foreign aid if Ukraine did not help his personal reelection campaign.
 
We don't know there's nothing criminal in the phone call, until a third party sees a transcript, or a witness is allowed to testify.

Congress is entitled to information that can settle the issues, and the fact that the WH refuses to let them see the relevant conversation, is a great tell of how incriminating the conversation must be.

It will be released.
Won't be anything criminal. How could there be? The president sets foreign policy.
 
But that is not the issue. He threatened to hold back US foreign aid if Ukraine did not help his personal reelection campaign.

We don't know that. And the stories from Ukraine and WSJ say that didn't happen.
 
Oh well its the Gospel then. Isn't he the same guy that said he had seen credible evidence of Trump colluding with Russia. How well did that work out. :lamo

Schiff is Chairman of the Judiciary Committee in the House.
 
It will be released.
Won't be anything criminal. How could there be? The president sets foreign policy.
He's not allowed to solicit foreign help for the election, or extort them to get it. :roll:
 
Most especially when the Ukranian leadership says it never happened.
It's funny that the president's personal lawyer, Giuliani, says that it did happen, and on national TV.
 
We don't know that. And the stories from Ukraine and WSJ say that didn't happen.


Trump is already admitting he talked to the President of Ukraine to ask him to investigate Joe Biden's son.
 
Yes. Yes, they can, and the internet is forever. A few years from now, when all this is over, and the dumpster fire has been extinguished, we can remind them of it
I'm taking screenshots.

I know that many will deny they ever joined the MAGA cult, so I'm saving evidence to shame them for when they suddenly find their Christian values a few years now, and show the future what they were during in this dark era.
 
It will be released.
Won't be anything criminal. How could there be? The president sets foreign policy.
So, you call trying to extort a foreign power to help with his re-election campaign, a non-criminal setting of foreign policy????????
You, like Trump, seem to ignore a piece of paper called the US Constitution.
 
It's funny that the president's personal lawyer, Giuliani, says that it did happen, and on national TV.


Mayor 911. Famous interview on CNN (?) where he admitted he and the President were lobbying the Ukraine government.
 
I'm taking screenshots.

I know that many will deny they ever joined the MAGA cult, so I'm saving evidence to shame them for when they suddenly find a moral compass.

Do you actually think they will ever find a moral compass? That compass has deteriorated a while ago, irreversibly.
 
I see all you have left are daycare taunts and a releasing of your inner two year old.:2wave:

Since it costs me nothing, I will take your reply about daycare as an expert opinion. Of which element I wrote do you often hear as a taunt there? You're certainly not suggesting that all your daycare foes are President Trump supporters, are you?

By the way, your rely to AlBq was: This argument is literally "Trump didn't do anything wrong ... BUT IF HE DID, SO WHAT?".

That is as juvenile as anything your playmates could form as an argument!

Regards,
CP
 
Do you actually think they will ever find a moral compass? That compass has deteriorated a while ago, irreversibly.
They will pretend to find one, count on it.

I see endless conservatives that swear up and down on FB that they never supported the Iraq war, because they now know what an unpopular war that was hindsight, so they lie about never supporting it to fool people.

Expect to see the same after Trump.
 
All your flailing and pretending to know what you're talking about, won't change the reality that you have zero understanding of the facts.

Your taunts do not intimidate me.
You have yet to address what's actually being said on the thread.
 
Trump is already admitting he talked to the President of Ukraine to ask him to investigate Joe Biden's son.

..and if Biden committed a crime, well, that's just okay? You do know the President heads up the Executive branch, right?

Wait until you see the peels fall away from the onion of attempted coup by the Democratic party in power in '16!!!!


Regards,
CP
 
Since it costs me nothing, I will take your reply about daycare as an expert opinion. Of which element I wrote do you often hear as a taunt there? You're certainly not suggesting that all your daycare foes are President Trump supporters, are you?

By the way, your rely to AlBq was: This argument is literally "Trump didn't do anything wrong ... BUT IF HE DID, SO WHAT?".

That is as juvenile as anything your playmates could form as an argument!

Regards,
CP
Um, you're the one that trolled "See you in 2020!" and went some bizarre rant about socialism and the election, not me.

You do what most conservatives do: act like a child to be annoying and provoke frustration from your opponent.

For the record, it didn't work.
 
Back
Top Bottom