- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 63,659
- Reaction score
- 33,706
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I know that. It was rape.
Sorry, I misinterpreted your post as sarcasm. eace
I know that. It was rape.
It is called ACTING and they have award events for it, or so I am told.THE ART OF THE DEAL:
Updated edition
DON'T **** WITH A PORN STAR!!!
Sorry couldn't help myself....
It is called ACTING and they have award events for it, or so I am told.
And again, there is one claim of a rape accusation in that link, and the person who is said to have accused him of rape says she didn't accuse him of rape.
Sorry, I misinterpreted your post as sarcasm. eace
Feeling violated and not feeling love and tenderness during sex is sexual assault, aka, rape.
don't believe so
sex between a prostitute and a john
not seeing the love and tenderness being present
and neither is there rape
Was Ivana a prostitute and 45 a "john?" Your idea of sex on an unwilling woman initiated by a man with the power to exert control, terrorize and punishment is indeed rape. Please, for the women in your life, learn the difference.
If you've read anything about the issue, you'd know damn well Ivana accused Trump of rape in a sworn deposition, which she acknowledges in her non-denial denial. The allegations contained in it are describing a brutal rape . That was under oath. Yes, after she got a big settlement, not doubt with a NDA typical of Trump, she pasted a non-denial denial on the front page of the book that didn't even approach a declaration that the account of it was false in any way.
If you want to claim that's not a "verified" accusation, fine, but you're just carrying Trump water like Sean Hannity. Don't hurt your back.... :roll:
You keep quoting a book that references a deposition that has been refuted by the witness as if the author is more trustworthy than the witness... the witness now has two different stories, either of which could be motivated by money. You think you can suss out what actually happened through the power of your hate for Trump. As I said, you are fooling yourself.
Ivana didn't refute a word of the book describing the event. I quoted her non-denial denial - quote the part where she disavows her sworn deposition. You can't do it. She has ONE story. The only thing she "refutes" is whether what is a rape is correctly described by the word "rape." Does changing the word change what happened?
And your claim was there was no "verified" accusation of rape. There is. I don't know how much more "verified" an accusation can get than events sworn to under oath in a legal proceeding.
As to what actually happened, I make no claim inside knowledge about that. That's you moving the goal posts.
BTW, using your standard, there has never been of course any "verified" accusation of rape by any woman regarding Bill Clinton. Both women who accused him of rape swore in court under oath that he did not rape them.
Ivana didn't refute a word of the book describing the event. I quoted her non-denial denial - quote the part where she disavows her sworn deposition. You can't do it. She has ONE story. The only thing she "refutes" is whether what is a rape is correctly described by the word "rape." Does changing the word change what happened?
And your claim was there was no "verified" accusation of rape. There is. I don't know how much more "verified" an accusation can get than events sworn to under oath in a legal proceeding.
As to what actually happened, I make no claim inside knowledge about that. That's you moving the goal posts.
BTW, using your standard, there has never been of course any "verified" accusation of rape by any woman regarding Bill Clinton. Both women who accused him of rape swore in court under oath that he did not rape them.
So in the accusation of "rape" Ivana now doesn't call it "rape". Like I said, she refutes the claim.
That is like saying she accused Trump of stealing a car, but then said she gave him the car, but since there was still an exchange of the vehicle the "theft" accusation stands.
Yeah, your right, throwing Ivana on the bed, pinning back her arms, grabbing Ivana by the hair, pulling out big lumps of it, as he's forcing himself on her, after which she fled crying and hid in another bedroom with the doors locked, and told friends was a rape and testified under oath was rape in her deposition, isn't really a rape!
Not one word of this does she dispute, so it was a rape, but not a "rape" rape! That's a great point!
Sure, she testified under oath in divorce court that Trump raped her. She had a financial incentive to make Trump seem as bad as possible in their divorce proceedings just like, as you claim, she has a financial incentive to claim Trump didn't rape her now.
My point is that there is financial incentive in either case for Ivana's claim so, therefor, it is a wash.