- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Messages
- 58,827
- Reaction score
- 17,437
What makes you think he is afraid?Again - where did I say that?
Can you tell me what Trump was afraid of in these possible recounts?
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
What makes you think he is afraid?Again - where did I say that?
Can you tell me what Trump was afraid of in these possible recounts?
How did trump get it stopped?
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
http://6abc.com/politics/judge-rejects-green-partys-pennsylvania-recount-case/1651954/
"Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any 'hack' occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania's voting system was not in any way compromised," Diamond wrote. He also said the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an "unexplained, highly prejudicial" wait before filing last week's lawsuit.
This disaster of a mess is finally over.
Wi is almost done with Hillary gaining only 25 votes.
a federal judge threw out the MI recount
and another federal judge just through out PA recount.
So Hillary lost twice just as expected. Thank goodness we didn't use that money for something important or donate it to a charity for the holidays!
The judge stopped the recount, not Trump.
The judge and the AG for the state have stated they would not be able to complete the recount.
So Trump or his representatives played no role in this matter according to you?
What role did his representatives play - post factual and verifiable evidence.
Hmm... as opposed to some loon "actively" demanding the recount of an entire state in under a week out of curiosity.
I have to side with the judge on this one.
What role did his representatives play - post factual and verifiable evidence.
Quote Originally Posted by NonoBadDog View Post
The judge stopped the recount, not Trump.
Appointed to the bench by GW Bush.
Recall the 2000 Bush Family Election in Florida.
Almost all of youse guyz hollered when an Obama appointed federal judge in MI ordered the recount. But now this order not to count is good...good judge, nice judge, sit judge.
you need to inform one of your allies here then
Pretending that Trump was a bystander and the judge did it all is utter nonsense. In reality Trump fought it. And in doing so - in an election he claimed was rigged and in which millions of illegal votes were cast - he is then part of covering up possible evidence that he is afraid of.
You're above reply is incoherent. /QUOTE]
Only to you - since I provided the comment in question from a person taking the same side you are taking.
Appointed to the bench by GW Bush.
Recall the 2000 Bush Family Election in Florida.
Almost all of youse guyz hollered when an Obama appointed federal judge in MI ordered the recount. But now this order not to count is good...good judge, nice judge, sit judge.
You're above reply is incoherent. Want to try again?
You asked a question - perhaps you erased it, but your question was something along the lines of "Do you think Trump or his representatives weren't involved"..... So I asked the question of YOU, who you claim was involved. You claim it's "utter nonsense" Trump was a bystander so .... I'll ask again, post evidence that's verifiable who was involved from Trump's side.
Since you know it's utter nonsense, you MUST have easy facts at your fingertips to inform us all.
You asked a question - perhaps you erased it, but your question was something along the lines of "Do you think Trump or his representatives weren't involved"..... So I asked the question of YOU, who you claim was involved. You claim it's "utter nonsense" Trump was a bystander so .... I'll ask again, post evidence that's verifiable who was involved from Trump's side.
Since you know it's utter nonsense, you MUST have easy facts at your fingertips to inform us all.
Hm... so the names of "Trumps lawyers" then? That's not verifiable.... I thought you understood what "verifiable" meant.
You have to wonder why Trump worked so hard to stop or prevent recounts in both Michigan and Pennsylvania and what he was afraid was going to emerge from those recounts?
This doubt - caused by his own actions - simply increases the ugly stain of illegitimacy upon the Trump presidency.
His? Who is the "he" you describe? What's the lawyers names... you don't know because the article doesn't name them. Trump himself wasn't there. So you've provided nothing.I provided verifiable evidence of the Trump involvement. Amount my burden of proof.
Why bother to quote a post and then rant about something else entirely? This thread, much less my post, is not about a different recount request, in a different state, at a different time and being decided by a different judge.
You ignore the impracticality of doing a statewide (manual?) recount within a week being requested based on nothing but a suspicion of some possible, yet unnamed, anomaly.
His? Who is the "he" you describe? What's the lawyers names... you don't know because the article doesn't name them. Trump himself wasn't there. So you've provided nothing.
That's what I thought. Thanks!
His whole argument has been this is fraud and hacking.
he was given plenty of info as to why this was not correct and ignored all of it.
it has been proven in at least 2 states that nothing sinister occurred.
the only reason the WI judge didn't throw it out was that it was almost done.
even in that recount Clinton only gain 20-60 votes while losing by 22k.
I provided the evidence of Trumps legal involvement in the effort to stop the Pennsylvania recount.
You know - for most of us this stuff is NOT rocket science and I have to wonder why it is so difficult for you to locate what I can find in mere seconds?
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...recount-to-line-her-pockets-trump-lawyer-says
That doesn't follow with the alt-left narrative. There MUST be something there.
.
Already addressed... Post #70.
I thought you "could not care less". Apparently that's not true either.