• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Childlike Sex Dolls

Such could be said with so many things. Cartoons, video games, Game of Thrones...the list could be endless.

Which tells us that they needed to scrape near the bottom of the barrel to get an argument that works so that they could do what they wanted to do.

"THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS"
 
They don't scream
They don't try to fight back
They don't wiggle or move in any sort of way.
They don't cry
They don't feel

For people that rape children to get off I wonder how much a doll would do the trick.

You think it might be a disappointing experience?
 
You think it might be a disappointing experience?

Wouldn't having sex with a doll be disappointing no matter what? I mean, it's a object that sticking you're dick in. The entire experience is so empty and void of everything human.

But yeah, I think it wouldn't hit the spot they are looking to hit.
 
Wouldn't having sex with a doll be disappointing no matter what? I mean, it's a object that sticking you're dick in. The entire experience is so empty and void of everything human.

But yeah, I think it wouldn't hit the spot they are looking to hit.

That is what I was thinking but those in the know keep saying that we might end up rather having sex with artificial women over the real ones.
 
Wouldn't having sex with a doll be disappointing no matter what? I mean, it's a object that sticking you're dick in. The entire experience is so empty and void of everything human.

But yeah, I think it wouldn't hit the spot they are looking to hit.

I have certainly always suspected it might be disappointing. On the other hand, if that is, what you expect it would be, disappointment might be its turning out to be saticefying. ;)
 
That is what I was thinking but those in the know keep saying that we might end up rather having sex with artificial women over the real ones.

The idea there is to make them essentially exactly the same thing physically, so with the physical stuff perfected the idea is that people will prefer it to avoid the other issues that go along with human relations. I doubt it will go the way they think either.
 
Last edited:
The idea there is to make them essentially exactly the same thing physically, so with the physical stuff perfected the idea is that people will prefer it to avoid the other issues that go along with human relations. I doubt it will go the way they think either.

That plus there is reason to expect our sex dolls to do what we want, we wont have any "Will I be a bad feminist if I give him what he wants, really rock his world" as we sometimes get with real women.
 
They don't scream
They don't try to fight back
They don't wiggle or move in any sort of way.
They don't cry
They don't feel

For people that rape children to get off I wonder how much a doll would do the trick.

You error is in assuming that the above is what "gets them off" in the first place.
 
There is nothing ok about adults being sexually attracted to children. Anyone who has sexual fantasies about children should be subjected to scorn and derision, not accommodation. We need to make it so that people are afraid to even entertain those thoughts. Providing child like dolls to practice on legitimizes perverse desires to a degree. Some appetites should not ever be fed.
For those with actual pedophilia, this is not a choice to be attracted, anymore than a kleptomaniac chooses to have the urges to steal. Many who have wanted to reach out for help having not yet hurt a child and not wanting to, do not precisely because of the attitude you are displaying. In essence, it is you who are furthering endangering children, by forcing them into hiding, insteading of getting the help they need to not hurt children.
 
Are cartoons illegal ? I had never been very interested in that facet of pedophile porn and had mostly seen justifications of restricting the citizens behavior by forbidding children in pornography as protection of the children involved. So you say it goes beyond this and is more driven by prudishness?

It is a thing that varies from areas to area, but yes, last I checked there are some places that actually ban even cartoon child porn.
 
It is a thing that varies from areas to area, but yes, last I checked there are some places that actually ban even cartoon child porn.

Maybe it is bad for the soul?
 
For those with actual pedophilia, this is not a choice to be attracted, anymore than a kleptomaniac chooses to have the urges to steal. Many who have wanted to reach out for help having not yet hurt a child and not wanting to, do not precisely because of the attitude you are displaying. In essence, it is you who are furthering endangering children, by forcing them into hiding, insteading of getting the help they need to not hurt children.

The issue is not making it harder for people to seek help. The issue is whether or not we should give them a tool (the doll) which helps perpetuate the sick fantasies? No one is arguing that a pedo should not go seek therapy. We are arguing that a pedo should not be handed a doll that looks like a 12-year old and encourage him to **** it.
 
The issue is not making it harder for people to seek help. The issue is whether or not we should give them a tool (the doll) which helps perpetuate the sick fantasies? No one is arguing that a pedo should not go seek therapy. We are arguing that a pedo should not be handed a doll that looks like a 12-year old and encourage him to **** it.

I would think it would be a better tool to allow them something for a release until their therapy can help them get better control on their urges, instead of attacking an actual child. I am thinking of a weaning process. Go one day without the use of the tool. Then two, then three, and so on until they are able to go without it, and at worse it comes out if the urges get overwhelming. If I have anger issues, then I would rather take it out on a man shaped hitting dummy (you see them mostly in martial arts schools) than a real person. Why would this be any different?

And people with XFactor's attitude do make it harder for those afflicted to seek help.
 
Providing child like dolls to practice on legitimizes perverse desires to a degree. Some appetites should not ever be fed.
Punching bags provide people with a way to simulate violence. Plastic shooting targets are shaped like humans so people can pretend like they're killing someone.

But yet there's no victim in any of those cases, and it doesn't mean that shooting plastic targets will somehow make you yearn to shoot anyone. A crime of violence can't be perpetrated against an inanimate object. You can dislike those things all you want, but the moment you lobby the government use force to lock a citizen in a cage for something you find distasteful, then you become the more dangerous threat to humanity.
 
The issue is not making it harder for people to seek help. The issue is whether or not we should give them a tool (the doll) which helps perpetuate the sick fantasies? No one is arguing that a pedo should not go seek therapy. We are arguing that a pedo should not be handed a doll that looks like a 12-year old and encourage him to **** it.

I think we should have child like sex robots for these pedos instead that will drag them out in front of a bus the first they try to molest it.
 
I think we should have child like sex robots for these pedos instead that will drag them out in front of a bus the first they try to molest it.

I'm thinking the government would ban it, but I suppose you will get a few before that happens.
 
I would think it would be a better tool to allow them something for a release until their therapy can help them get better control on their urges, instead of attacking an actual child. I am thinking of a weaning process. Go one day without the use of the tool. Then two, then three, and so on until they are able to go without it, and at worse it comes out if the urges get overwhelming. If I have anger issues, then I would rather take it out on a man shaped hitting dummy (you see them mostly in martial arts schools) than a real person. Why would this be any different?

And people with XFactor's attitude do make it harder for those afflicted to seek help.

I'd maybe consider it if a consensus of professionals agreed to that theory, and if scientific evidence backed them up.
 
I think we should have child like sex robots for these pedos instead that will drag them out in front of a bus the first they try to molest it.

:lol: that was good.
 
I'd maybe consider it if a consensus of professionals agreed to that theory, and if scientific evidence backed them up.

Given the current attitude as displayed here by Henrin and the like, it would seem hard to even get such a study funded. You've seen the comments here alone of how people want to instantly jail anyone who has the urges, if not do worse to them. In their minds a pedophile doesn't even need to harm a child, just thinking it is crime enough for chemical if not physical castration, assuming they are in a forgiving mood. It's basically a catch 22. Can't show that it works unless a study is done, but can't do a study because the people it could help are afraid to enter the study because of people like Henrin.
 
Given the current attitude as displayed here by Henrin and the like, it would seem hard to even get such a study funded. You've seen the comments here alone of how people want to instantly jail anyone who has the urges, if not do worse to them. In their minds a pedophile doesn't even need to harm a child, just thinking it is crime enough for chemical if not physical castration, assuming they are in a forgiving mood. It's basically a catch 22. Can't show that it works unless a study is done, but can't do a study because the people it could help are afraid to enter the study because of people like Henrin.

:confused:

You just applied positions to me that I did not take.
 
What facts indeed. All you are presenting here are subjective values. The closest you've come to a fact is if you were using the term "deviance" in a statistical context, which I somehow doubt. As noted in the other thread, simply because something doesn't fit in the statistical norm, does not automatically make it a negative.

Ovid doesn't do facts.
 
Given the current attitude as displayed here by Henrin and the like, it would seem hard to even get such a study funded. You've seen the comments here alone of how people want to instantly jail anyone who has the urges, if not do worse to them. In their minds a pedophile doesn't even need to harm a child, just thinking it is crime enough for chemical if not physical castration, assuming they are in a forgiving mood. It's basically a catch 22. Can't show that it works unless a study is done, but can't do a study because the people it could help are afraid to enter the study because of people like Henrin.

lol...I'd bet the house that we'd learn a whole lot about the people you mention if we could tap into their minds and see what secret fantasies they harbor within them. I doubt they would really support us arresting people for their sick thoughts.
 
Back
Top Bottom