- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 134,523
- Reaction score
- 31,496
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yes, you read that right.
Thoughts?
. What . The . **** . ??
Yes, you read that right.
Thoughts?
I think the obvious response is that this is a disgusting thing to create, however, if it lessens the need for them to offend in reality I am for it. We have plenty of murder simulating video games and we have no problem with those.
Yes, you read that right.
Thoughts?
Sounds sick, but with the gays all out of the closet, and there being no limitations at all, it's no surprise to me. It had to happen eventually.
This thread has nothing to do with being gay. Kindly keep your prejudices to yourself.
OK, it doesn't have a thing to do with being gay. Instead, it has to do with unchecked and unnatural sexual desires.
Happy now?
I went looking to see what the dolls looked like -- and I wish I hadn't. I find the images very disturbing.
That said, I don't know whether giving them to pedophiles would encourage more of their warped behavior, or provide an outlet that kept them from real children.
I think it's very difficult to overcome the fact that it's just plain wrong to want to have sex with a child, and I tend to come down on the side that these dolls are so lifelike that it's almost like permitting child molestation. It's sickening.
On the other hand, I know it's not real. I've heard it said that priests may not have molested (the ones who did) if they'd been allowed to marry. I don't know if there are any studies to substantiate that claim, but I've heard it in the past.
My fear is that dolls like this would be more likely to encourage aberrant behavior. Kind of like a serial killer's first kill. Before that -- it's just a warped idea -- but after that, it enters the realm of what he can get away with, and, from what I've read, it only increases his appetite for more killing.
Unless someone could actually show through testing that these dolls could reduce the risk to real children -- I have to come down on the side of banning the dolls. It's simply disgusting.
What do you mean by unnatural sex?
If you ban it then how do you test to see if it is effective? And these are new enough that there can't have been any significant studies to their effectiveness yet. It is something that would have to be followed over years.
I would have thought it would have been clear by now.
Are you playing games? What do you "think" I mean by that?
If you think about it, I'm sure you can figure it out within a minute.
I hate these pretend games.
If a person has a sexual fantasy then it is natural to that person. We are a product of nature and evolution. You are confusing the words unnatural and illegal.
You are wrong. But I've heard your excuse so many times but it's an easy thing to assume. And were too imaginitive. With imagination, we can take part in almost any kind of sex and no matter how crazy or stupid it is, you can still manage to call it "natural".
It is not natural.
Are these sex acts being done by consenting supernatural beings?
Yes, you read that right.
Thoughts?
I assume you think your being clever. But to answer your question, since there are no supernatural beings, the act of two same sex persons having sex is unnatural.
Yes, you read that right.
Thoughts?
They do it, therefore it is natural.
Can you be more specific? Simply saying it does no make it so.
One thought, DIGUSTING.
Supposed to alleviate the urge? More like ignite it with a vengeance!
Where is your proof? Do please try to provide actual proof and not fall back on the tired "common sense" argument.
Did I say I had proof? Where is yours, do you support this perverted garbage?
I assume you think your being clever. But to answer your question, since there are no supernatural beings, the act of two same sex persons having sex is unnatural.
If they do it then it is a part of nature. The Bible can say what it likes.
Wrong. It is 100% natural.