Barr releases summary

[Bullseye]

This kind of self gratification isn't really the type of thing you do in public.

I'm still waiting for a better analysis of the data, but even if there is 100% clearing of Trump's name on this one particular item, he's still got other problems. In addition... Pelosi and Schumer resign? I mean ... really? Grok, you are getting too excited, bud.

The country's top lawyer has given his analysis. Who's going to give a "better" analysis?

 

[Fletch]

TIME FOR SCHIFF-FOR-BRAINS, to RESIGN.

TIME for SCHUMER to RESIGN.

TIME for PELOSI to RESIGN.

Time for EVERY LYING LEFTIST on the HILL, who has called the President a "TRAITOR" to RESIGN.

Toral vindication for not only Trump, but for those who saw this entire episode as nonsense. What should happen, but wont, is that liberals who bought into the collusion nonsense and swore by it for the last two years, should be pissed at those in media and democrat leadership who pushed this lie that they swallowed hook line and sinker.

 

[Bullseye]

Mueller says no collusion, and left it up to the AG who found no action of Obstruction of Justice.
Pretty much what I have surmised all along, including the POTUS. Glad to be a supporter of this president... He sure as **** didn't deserve this ****.

This is a good day for our country...

I think the Trump resistors, and their lying media owe the president apology.
But they won't. They'll just keep on with their silly CT; morons.

If Mueller and 19 Dem-donor lawyers couldn't make the case for collusion or obstruction I'd say that turns out the lights, but, lefties are just as poor losers as they are poor winners so this **** will go on for months, at least. Bet on it.

 

[CitizenBasehead]

did you think they wouldn't be?

they spent billions of dollars over 2 years trying to paint the president as a collusion russian plant.
lmao

they were 100% wrong and the fake news that the president said they were.
they were making up stories from questionable sources and from probably obama left over plants.

it was amazing the sheer dishonesty of what they were reporting now they have 100% damage control
to do and the only way to do that is to now say that the mueller report is not on the up and up.

They had to know that the investigation was BS from the beginning.

Using crap sources with a bone to pick, pretty much shows MSM never had any intention of correctly reporting on the investigation.

The conclusion of the investigation proves there was nothing going on.

The whole thing really does look like a witch hunt to dig up dirt on Trump.

 

[Fletch]

"Lighten up" for one. I am neither sad, happy, or otherwise emotionally affected by this news. Thus, it is projection to predict my mood.

Thats not what projection means, but whatever. But you should be happy that the President and his entire staff have been vindicated of the charges that they colluded with Russia. You should be pissed at those who pushed this lie for the last two years. And you should be grateful for those of us who saw through this right away and did everything we could to help you see the light.

 

[Airyaman]

why can't you answer the question?
is mueller a trump supporter?

Wait, you asked that question? I never saw it.

Was I supposed to "read between the lines"?

I have no idea how Mueller views Trump. He's never talked about it.

he is the one saying no collusion no obstruction.

Yes and "no conclusion". Yes to "no collusion" and "I did not find enough evidence to either charge with a crime or exonerate" in regards to obstruction.

hard to have investigaitons when no crime has been comitted.
it isn't my view it is muellers view.

i am stating facts sorry you don't like facts.
they won't change simply because you don't like them.

the mueller report blew a grand cavern into all these investigations.

You've read Mueller's report? All I've seen are Barr's summations.

 

[CitizenBasehead]

More projection.

Bro your one the crying about how its not over, when it clearly is.

Dude its a holiday, there's no need for this...

 

[Fletch]

Wrong:
There was the meeting on Flynn
There is the dangling of pardons
There is the President of the United States, the Chief Executive commenting on open prosecutions after Indictment and before the Jury renders a decision.

Those for starters.

Frankly, Barr had no business stepping in and extending Mueller's comments on Obstruction particularly given Barr's whacky legal opinion on the topic. Particularly disconcerting that Barr did not include one complete sentence from Mueller in the "supposed" Mueller quotes. All three people, Barr, Rosenstein and Mueller will have to be brought to the Hill and now that Barr has been so "selective" in what he has described as a Mueller quote, we will have to see the whole Mueller report.

Also, Barr did not even consult Mueller in offering Barr's Obstruction opinion in the letter.

No collusion. No coordination. No conspiracy. No indictments. Let that sink in.

 

[CitizenBasehead]

Yes and "no conclusion". Yes to "no collusion" and "I did not find enough evidence to either charge with a crime or exonerate" in regards to obstruction.

In regards to obstruction. Are you saying, Comey wasn't a incompetent idiot that deserved to be fired?

Good luck pushing that narrative.

 

[Airyaman]

Thats not what projection means, but whatever. But you should be happy that the President and his entire staff have been vindicated of the charges that they colluded with Russia. You should be pissed at those who pushed this lie for the last two years. And you should be grateful for those of us who saw through this right away and did everything we could to help you see the light.

Yes it is. If I have not made any indication of my mood, expressed anger, outrage, or anything remotely similar, then there is no real reason to be told to "lighten up". To imply my mood is uptight without any real indication is a form of projection of how the other wants my mood to appear. It may not fit exactly with the textbook definition of psychological projection, but it certainly has no basis in the logical interpretation of my words.

That said, if Trump and Co. are truly guilt free of "collusion", good for them. I'm glad they supposedly did not coordinate with a foreign power. But the thing here gets sticky because I never thought they did. So really, I have no emotional reaction to something I already believed in the first place.

As to people pushing lies, I'm every bit as mad at them as I am a president who lies to me daily. After all, pushing lies is pushing lies, no?

Are you mad that Trump lies to you?

Finally, I cannot be grateful to anyone for showing me something I already knew, so don't look for any thanks.

 

[Fletch]

If Mueller and 19 Dem-donor lawyers couldn't make the case for collusion or obstruction I'd say that turns out the lights, but, lefties are just as poor losers as they are poor winners so this **** will go on for months, at least. Bet on it.

It will. The people who helped perpetuate the collusion lie will now try to pretend there was obstruction in the absence of an underlying crime. That will work on the Collusionistas and the bitter clingers but no one else. The hateful left was dumb enough to fall for it once. They will fall for it again.

 

[Airyaman]

Bro your one the crying about how its not over, when it clearly is.

Dude its a holiday, there's no need for this...

Yes, the Mueller investigation is over.

The follow-up investigations are not.

If you believe so, I think you'll wake up two years from now and wonder when they will end.

 

[Fletch]

Yes it is. If I have not made any indication of my mood, expressed anger, outrage, or anything remotely similar, then there is no real reason to be told to "lighten up". To imply my mood is uptight without any real indication is a form of projection of how the other wants my mood to appear. It may not fit exactly with the textbook definition of psychological projection, but it certainly has no basis in the logical interpretation of my words.

That said, if Trump and Co. are truly guilt free of "collusion", good for them. I'm glad they supposedly did not coordinate with a foreign power. But the thing here gets sticky because I never thought they did. So really, I have no emotional reaction to something I already believed in the first place.

As to people pushing lies, I'm every bit as mad at them as I am a president who lies to me daily. After all, pushing lies is pushing lies, no?

Are you mad that Trump lies to you?

Finally, I cannot be grateful to anyone for showing me something I already knew, so don't look for any thanks.

Yeah, Im expecting that the liberal reaction to this will be "I never believed the collusion stuff anyway.."

 

[trixare4kids]

Is there a Catholic or Jew or Union Member in the country that STILL votes Democrat?

WHAT ARE THEY THINKING?

I'm sure they're all pretty upset over the Mueller report.
Ask me if I give a damn?

The Democrats, including those vying for president deserve every bit of ridicule coming their way.
These people lied their asses off, invented evil scenarios about him, his family his campaign workers, attempting a political coup, ... all because they were butt-hurt that someone like Donald Trump beat their precious Hillary.

Well f-them...

 

[calamity]

I'm sure they're all pretty upset over the Mueller report.
Ask me if I give a damn?

The Democrats, including those vying for president deserve every bit of ridicule coming their way.
These people lied their asses off, invented evil scenarios about him, his family his campaign workers, attempting a political coup, ... all because they were butt-hurt that someone like Donald Trump beat their precious Hillary.

Well f-them...

We'd love the Mueller report. Maybe you should insist that your side releases it.

 

[Airyaman]

Yeah, Im expecting that the liberal reaction to this will be "I never believed the collusion stuff anyway.."

I don't care about what anyone else thinks. I have a short history here, and a slightly longer one at another board, which would be much longer had they not deep sixed the old vBulletin they had. But feel free to search my history here, and what I have under the same name at community.hannity.com if you don't believe that I've said on more than one occasion that I did not believe that Trump colluded.

 

[CitizenBasehead]

Yes, the Mueller investigation is over.

The follow-up investigations are not.

If you believe so, I think you'll wake up two years from now and wonder when they will end.

I couldn't care less about follow-up investigations and other people are going to stop caring.

You need to think of how this looks to sane mentally healthy people, that are not suffering from TDS, its not good dude.

 

[Airyaman]

I couldn't care less about follow-up investigations and other people are going to stop caring.

You need to think of how this looks to sane mentally healthy people, that are not suffering from TDS, its not good dude.

Yet, regardless of whether you care or not, they will happen. That's just reality, regardless of your opinion of them.

 

[CitizenBasehead]

Yet, regardless of whether you care or not, they will happen. That's just reality, regardless of your opinion of them.

I know, happy 'no collusion day' bro.

 

[Good4Nothin]

I am not a big Trump supporter, but the TDS insanity caused me to sympathize with him. I KNEW the Russia thing was a pile of BS.

So no surprises. But what I am not sure I understand is how the Democrats worked themselves into such a lather they couldn't see straight. What will Rachel Maddow talk about now? How she's a partisan maniac?

 

[VanceMack]

I don't care about what anyone else thinks. I have a short history here, and a slightly longer one at another board, which would be much longer had they not deep sixed the old vBulletin they had. But feel free to search my history here, and what I have under the same name at community.hannity.com if you don't believe that I've said on more than one occasion that I did not believe that Trump colluded.

If he didnt collude why would he obstruct? And since he never attempted to stop the Mueller investigation and Comey himself said his firing was in no way a threat to the Mueller investigation, why would anyone give obstruction a second thought, let alone a first, unless they were mindlessly regurgitating idiotic leftist talking points?

 

[trixare4kids]

If he didnt collude why would he obstruct? And since he never attempted to stop the Mueller investigation and Comey himself said his firing was in no way a threat to the Mueller investigation, why would anyone give obstruction a second thought, let alone a first, unless they were mindlessly regurgitating idiotic leftist talking points?

I've been waiting for this question to be asked.
T/Y
Now will any of the Trump resisters answer it?

:coffeepap:

 

[VanceMack]

I've been waiting for this question to be asked.
T/Y
Now will any of the Trump resisters answer it?

:coffeepap:

I just think they have the funniest damn way of building an argument. They crow about the gestapo tactics Mueller used with impunity, brag about the violations of 4th amendment rights of US citizens resulting in indictments of Americans, gloat about the abuses and lies before the FISA court, then declare that somehow there was 'obstruction'.

Just....stupid. But they are told to dance, so they will dance.

 

[Grokmaster]

Wrong:
There was the meeting on Flynn
There is the dangling of pardons
There is the President of the United States, the Chief Executive commenting on open prosecutions after Indictment and before the Jury renders a decision.

Those for starters.

Frankly, Barr had no business stepping in and extending Mueller's comments on Obstruction particularly given Barr's whacky legal opinion on the topic. Particularly disconcerting that Barr did not include one complete sentence from Mueller in the "supposed" Mueller quotes. All three people, Barr, Rosenstein and Mueller will have to be brought to the Hill and now that Barr has been so "selective" in what he has described as a Mueller quote, we will have to see the whole Mueller report.

Also, Barr did not even consult Mueller in offering Barr's Obstruction opinion in the letter.

"Dangling" is not a crime. If there was a case for obstruction, MUELLER WOULD HAVE BROUGHT IT.


This is just too much for your little leftist mind to process, isn't it?

 

[Grokmaster]

Wait, you asked that question? I never saw it.

Was I supposed to "read between the lines"?

I have no idea how Mueller views Trump. He's never talked about it.



Yes and "no conclusion". Yes to "no collusion" and "I did not find enough evidence to either charge with a crime or exonerate" in regards to obstruction.



You've read Mueller's report? All I've seen are Barr's summations.

The USAG and Asst. USAG REACHED A CONCLUSION , and it was NO EVIDENCE of OBSTRUCTION.


Why do you keep trying to pretend that didn't happen?




Rhetorical question...we KNOW WHY.... :boohoo: