- Joined
- Jun 4, 2019
- Messages
- 8,747
- Reaction score
- 5,019
- Location
- Northern Utah
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Indeed.
Trump did say he loved the uneducated.
They flock to him like a suckling piglet to an open teat.
Indeed.
Stewart: "I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
Stewart: "Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
And there you have it.
Her testimony added nothing to the impeachment case which is why every thread here is about the tweets and how mean Trump was to reassign her. If dems actually had a case against Trump they wouldnt have wasted their time calling this woman.
1) She worked for 4 Republican Presidents starting with Reagan
2) Nobody in the State Dept contested her credentials as an effective fighter against corruption and I would simply suggest that their opinion is more reliable than anything posters here are going to come up with
3) Rudy and his gang had been trying to have her recalled since 2018. They had little time left to pull off their scam for Fat Donald and for themselves by 2019. They finally torpedoed her. She was recalled the day Zalinsky was inaugurated. What they didn't expect was that Pompeo would appoint Taylor, a tough experienced Charge d' Affairs candidate that immediately went into the Acting Ambassador role. Taylor came up to speed faster than drunken Rudy anticipated and the gig was up. I suspect Fat Donald is not happy with Pompeo. Suddenly Taylor started making noise, Sondland could not keep his BIG MOUTH SHUT (what an idiot) and Igor and Lev were just a little too "gamey" for their own good. Nice choice of partners Don and Rudy. Congress started to make noise about the delay in sending the Military Aid and there were already OMB Officers nervous because they knew holding the funds was illegal. So the funds had to be released.
Poor DonDon. Apparently he did not know that if he had held on for two more days, Zalinsky would have given him his public announcement of Investigations on CNN no less. Dumbass DonDon....lost his nerve and premature ejaculated.....probably something Melania knows something about.
I haven't questioned her credentials. The rest of your post is opinion. Exactly what gig was up?
What the Democrats have = Nothing
"the gig" refers to the shadow State Department Rudy Colludy was running in Ukraine.
"the gig" refers to the shadow State Department Rudy Colludy was running in Ukraine.
Her testimony added nothing to the impeachment case which is why every thread here is about the tweets and how mean Trump was to reassign her. If dems actually had a case against Trump they wouldnt have wasted their time calling this woman.
I'm not interested in Yovanovitch's opinions regarding Trump. She was appointed by Obama. I don't expect her to "like" Trump. Thst has nothing whatever to do with the job she was appointed to perform. She had the option to resign at any time.
Izzat like the deep state, or is it completely different?
More fan fiction from the left
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Stewart: "I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
Stewart: "Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
And there you have it.
she began her foreign service career under reagan
she served four republican presidents
Yes, there is an example of one of the oldest courtroom cheap tricks in the book. A witness is not there to determine if a crime has been committed, they are they to give testimony in regards to their experiences and interactions - PERIOD.
Of course ignorance of that obvious fact is probably why such a cheap trick works so well in Trumpland.
:lamo
Trump and his base. Repeating nonsense ad infinitum.
Question: Was she there to act as judge and jury, or was she there to give her take on what happened?
So what? I'm referring to her position as ambassador. She's still an employee of State. I've asked another here, so I'll ask you. Yovanovitch claims she was appointed as ambassador to Ukraine to clean up corruption. Can you give me an example of her efforts in that regard? After all, it's one thing to say you're doing that, and another to show demonstrable results.
I assume she was there to support Schiff's charges, which originally were something about a quid pro quo. That was inane, so Adam changed it to bribery. Now it looks like making a former ambassador feel bad is claimed to be an impeachable offense.
So what? I'm referring to her position as ambassador. She's still an employee of State. I've asked another here, so I'll ask you. Yovanovitch claims she was appointed as ambassador to Ukraine to clean up corruption. Can you give me an example of her efforts in that regard? After all, it's one thing to say you're doing that, and another to show demonstrable results.
we know she knew who some of the corrupt ukrainian players were and that she alerted appropriate authorities with that information when it might be helpful in their counter-corruption efforts. is that the information from her testimony you are seeking? you should have listened to it
and that is where the problem began
Those documents are at State, which refuses to supply them even under subpoena.
then you are unable to recognize that the unsavory, corrupt players from the former ukrainian regime were able to work thru the white house to remove an American ambassador who had been successfully aiding the new administration's efforts to become more democratic and less corrupt
Okay. What was the original purpose claimed by Schiff?