- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 47,144
- Reaction score
- 22,940
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Medicare for All will cost about $32 trillion over 10 years. Bernie taking from evil billionaires leaves Medicare for All about 13.6% funded. Let's give Bernie points and assume that all the other candidates fund less than 13.6% of their plans, so I'll give points to Bernie here.
Question for you. If Medicare for all will cots $32 trillion, and the current system would cost $56 trillion, how could we afford to pay $20 trillion less?
The reasoning behind my posting is that when a socialist complains about billionaires hoarding all the wealth, and then aims to take that wealth with a bold plan, I expect some real money for the citizenry. $5200 for a family of 4 per year isn't real money, and it's reflected in the poor 13.6% funding for healthcare for all. But it seems like a lot more when coupled with the phrase "tax the rich".
When people's expenses go down that $20 trillion, when people no longer have to pay on student debt and tuition, when a larger share of wealth goes to the people, that is 'real money for the citizenry'. And I haven't even gotten to benefits such as protecting the environment and having a real consumer finance protection bureau and countless more improvements.