• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Not Registration and Permits?

Really? And what did you say you would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?

go back and read

-------------

dude, you are transparent as is every gun nut here

you want to be a blow hard and say you are going to shoot at anyone that wants to take your gun

it's old, it's stupid but it's gun nut dogma

the gun is nothing but a penis extender to most
 
go back and read
I went back, and I don't see that you ever actually answered my question. I'll ask it one more time: What would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?
-------------

dude, you are transparent as is every gun nut here

you want to be a blow hard and say you are going to shoot at anyone that wants to take your gun

it's old, it's stupid but it's gun nut dogma

the gun is nothing but a penis extender to most
Is this addressed to me? Or is it a signature or something?
 
I'm not sure how I feel about that.

I think its restricted information, but again the public have a right to know.

Sure. But by that same logic, I would have a right to everyone's medical records to verify that no one with communicable diseases lives nearby me.
 
I went back, and I don't see that you ever actually answered my question. I'll ask it one more time: What would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?

sorry you can't understand. i already spoke to this


Is this addressed to me? Or is it a signature or something?

it is not a signature, it is my free tutelage to those who don't understand what is going on.
 
sorry you can't understand. i already spoke to this
Sorry you are reluctant to speak your mind. Such reticence tends to end conversations. But of course everyone can see who bagged out, so I'm okay with the state of things.
it is not a signature, it is my free tutelage to those who don't understand what is going on.
Okay, so not a signature. Got it.
 
Sure. But by that same logic, I would have a right to everyone's medical records to verify that no one with communicable diseases lives nearby me.

I don't think you do

I think gun registration data should be like Census data; for government use only.
 
I don't think you do

I think gun registration data should be like Census data; for government use only.

sort of the same way you feel about guns-only the government should own them
 
I don't think you do

I think gun registration data should be like Census data; for government use only.

Ah, the state likes its data secret. There's nothing creepy about that, no, not at all...
 
I see nothing wrong with the number of people in a state being public knowledge.

Then you've never filled in a census form have you ?

Much less the American Community Survey - do you even know what that is ?
 
Ah, the state likes its data secret. There's nothing creepy about that, no, not at all...

Anonymous, until your not. Don't be fooled, the agenda is to take everything.
 
Then you've never filled in a census form have you ?

Much less the American Community Survey - do you even know what that is ?

You make a lot of assumptions about this poster. It's entertaining.

Census = number of people in a state, no?
 
Anonymous, until your not. Don't be fooled, the agenda is to take everything.

Obviously. They're thugs that rely upon violence. I expect nothing less.
 
Ah yes I have, which is why I know the US census hasn't just beeb a head count question

Which you clearly think it is.


"Census = number of people in a state, no?"

Then if you have, you would know that there is no obligation to answer any question other than the number of people in the household.

Are you afraid of the government knowing how many people dwell in your household?

Or are you just afraid of the government?
 
Then if you have, you would know that there is no obligation to answer any question other than the number of people in the household.

LOL

Yes there is !!!!!


Yet more proof that you've never filled one in

A US court ruled that the $100 that the Constitution states that someone refusing to complete a Census should be fined....actually applies to each and every question on the census


So you're wrong and have never filled in a census form ever....as your DOUBLE ignorance of it shows.

It does ask for more than a head count...and you do have to answer ALL the questions.


Why don't you Google the 2010 census short form ?
 
LOL

Yes there is !!!!!


Yet more proof that you've never filled one in

A US court ruled that the $100 that the Constitution states that someone refusing to complete a Census should be fined....actually applies to each and every question on the census


So you're wrong and have never filled in a census form ever....as your DOUBLE ignorance of it shows.

It does ask for more than a head count...and you do have to answer ALL the questions.


Why don't you Google the 2010 census short form ?

Nope. You're wrong, and have no actual evidence. Number of people. That's it.
 
Sorry you are reluctant to speak your mind. Such reticence tends to end conversations. But of course everyone can see who bagged out, so I'm okay with the state of things.
Okay, so not a signature. Got it.

still can't understand, lol

yep, trump's for you!
 
Back
Top Bottom