Samwise
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
- Messages
- 2,040
- Reaction score
- 200
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
i did say
Really? And what did you say you would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?
i did say
Really? And what did you say you would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?
I went back, and I don't see that you ever actually answered my question. I'll ask it one more time: What would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?go back and read
Is this addressed to me? Or is it a signature or something?-------------
dude, you are transparent as is every gun nut here
you want to be a blow hard and say you are going to shoot at anyone that wants to take your gun
it's old, it's stupid but it's gun nut dogma
the gun is nothing but a penis extender to most
I'm not sure how I feel about that.
I think its restricted information, but again the public have a right to know.
I went back, and I don't see that you ever actually answered my question. I'll ask it one more time: What would advocate being done to a person who has guns of which you don't approve?
Is this addressed to me? Or is it a signature or something?
Sorry you are reluctant to speak your mind. Such reticence tends to end conversations. But of course everyone can see who bagged out, so I'm okay with the state of things.sorry you can't understand. i already spoke to this
Okay, so not a signature. Got it.it is not a signature, it is my free tutelage to those who don't understand what is going on.
Sure. But by that same logic, I would have a right to everyone's medical records to verify that no one with communicable diseases lives nearby me.
I don't think you do
I think gun registration data should be like Census data; for government use only.
I don't think you do
I think gun registration data should be like Census data; for government use only.
sort of the same way you feel about guns-only the government should own them
Ah, the state likes its data secret. There's nothing creepy about that, no, not at all...
Would you prefer it if census data was open to all.
I see nothing wrong with the number of people in a state being public knowledge.
Ah, the state likes its data secret. There's nothing creepy about that, no, not at all...
Then you've never filled in a census form have you ?
Much less the American Community Survey - do you even know what that is ?
Anonymous, until your not. Don't be fooled, the agenda is to take everything.
You make a lot of assumptions about this poster. It's entertaining.
Census = number of people in a state, no?
No
Like I said, you've never actually filled one in have you ?
Obviously you haven't.
Ah yes I have, which is why I know the US census hasn't just beeb a head count question
Which you clearly think it is.
"Census = number of people in a state, no?"
Then if you have, you would know that there is no obligation to answer any question other than the number of people in the household.
LOL
Yes there is !!!!!
Yet more proof that you've never filled one in
A US court ruled that the $100 that the Constitution states that someone refusing to complete a Census should be fined....actually applies to each and every question on the census
So you're wrong and have never filled in a census form ever....as your DOUBLE ignorance of it shows.
It does ask for more than a head count...and you do have to answer ALL the questions.
Why don't you Google the 2010 census short form ?
Jeez, your post is pathetic
Sorry you are reluctant to speak your mind. Such reticence tends to end conversations. But of course everyone can see who bagged out, so I'm okay with the state of things.
Okay, so not a signature. Got it.
but we know they are not