- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 21,111
- Reaction score
- 7,802
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It's just simple etiquette. You shouldn't have to be told not to be rude.
and yet you continue to be.
It's just simple etiquette. You shouldn't have to be told not to be rude.
Morality is what is right. Period. Proof of morality are the consequences that follow. Bad consequences for immoral acts always follow whether or not you believe the act is immoral. That's how you can tell. The Cahtolic Church in its wisdom is the world's foremost expert on what is moral and what isn't. The Church is a great guide. And people need that because not all immoral acts are obvious at first glance.
Nobody's protecting the atheist gay infiltrators except in the public schools where they're simply moved around. Even to this day. The RCC weeded out those people long ago.
If you don't follow the tenets of a religion, you don't subscribe to that religion. Again, basic logic. Being pro-life is the cornerstone of the Catholic Faith. If you disagree with that position, you are not a practicing Catholic.
Anyone who disagrees with Christian teaching is a fake Christian, yes. Glad you recognize that.
Huh? If you don't want something to happen, then you don't do the thing that makes it happen. What could be more logical than that? Unless you're a leftwinger of course.
There is no Debate 101. I am not required to chase my tail for trolls. You want the verse? Look it up.
I agree, except for the idea that a god/s has anything to do with them.
I was going to say the same about getting in a car, but roguenuke beat me to it.
Uh, "Cahtolic" is not a word. Derp!
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
If you don't follow the tenets of a religion, you don't subscribe to that religion. Again, basic logic. Being pro-life is the cornerstone of the Catholic Faith. If you disagree with that position, you are not a practicing Catholic.
The only two times I've gotten pregnant in over 20 years of sexual activity is from the times when my husband and I were not taking any precautions, using no birth control of any type to prevent. And I'm from a very fertile family. I have two sons.
When I talk to pro-choice people it seems that a big reason abortions exist is so the baby does not get born into a financially unstable family or an abusive one. However, I think that abortion is not the solution. If a woman is not financially stable she should not be having unprotected sex and should understand the consequences of her actions, in my opinion. This brings me to my main question...(drum roll please..) Why pick abortion over things like adoption or foster care? There are thousands of couples/families that are infertile and cannot get pregnant on their own. I myself have two adopted siblings who now have a better life and a future. Any thoughts and opinions would be great, Thanks!
While I know there are some that absolutely follow Catholic doctrine without question, (and they seem to be the only Catholics out on this board), even some ignoring certain doctrines put out by certain Popes, the majority of Catholics do not have any issue using various forms of birth control, and have done so sometime in their lives. My mother and her family are Catholic from her generation, back. They do have large families but also encourage the use of birth control for those not ready for children or done having children, including condoms, pills, even vasectomy and tubal ligation. My maternal grandmother used to tell me that while she believed being gay was wrong, it was really up to God and between God and them and it wasn't for her to judge. She supported same sex marriage in the 90s, and this is a woman who recited prayers on her rosary for 4 hours every day prior to doing absolutely anything else after she got up in the morning.According to another extremist Catholic on this forum, married couples should not have sex unless they want to produce a child. Every sex act should be with the intention of having a child...or not have sex. EMN Seattle has been clear on that.
So if you can only afford 2 kids...no more sex after that. Even the rhythm method fails sometimes.
It's insane, to the level of cult following.
Actually, there were plenty of occasions I had sex, always using birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Guess what, I never got pregnant. Funny how well that worked out, don't you think?
Artificial birth control is immmoral, so that is nothing to brag about.
Evangelicals talk very big about their godliness being greater than the sinners of other religions. Turns out their talk is cheap
The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience
A Sociologist of Religion on Protestants, Porn, and the “Purity Industrial Complex” | The New Yorker
The racial demons that help explain evangelical support for Trump - Vox
So much for Christian charity: Evangelicals blame the poor for poverty, which makes them a lot like other Republicans | Salon.com
They don't fare well on tolerance, divorce, adultery, teen pregnancy either. The biblical command “A wise man will hear, and will increase learning; and a man of understanding shall attain unto wise counsels:” is generally ignored and replaced by blind faith.
Why? I'm not the one claiming others shouldn't be rude.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
I agree, it sure was. I only hope it will never go back to that time again.
According to another extremist Catholic on this forum, married couples should not have sex unless they want to produce a child. Every sex act should be with the intention of having a child...or not have sex. EMN Seattle has been clear on that.
So if you can only afford 2 kids...no more sex after that. Even the rhythm method fails sometimes.
It's insane, to the level of cult following.
No it wasn't. America protected women from having illegal abortions by having societal condemnation of it. Those were better times.
Actually, the position is no sex act should preclude children. That's why the rhythm method is acceptable. The irreligious cult says sex should a a purely selfish mechanical act.
I don't want to be in a car accident, that doesn't mean I never ride in a car. It means I take precautions to prevent or minimize those accidents. If an accident happens, I also do not have to accept whatever happens to me as "well thats what I get". No, I can do things to change the situation, including allowing medical attention, surgeries, rehabilitation, etc, whatever works for me.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
The only two times I've gotten pregnant in over 20 years of sexual activity is from the times when my husband and I were not taking any precautions, using no birth control of any type to prevent. And I'm from a very fertile family. I have two sons.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Aaaannndddd he's done. Even if he returns here, he's done. His bumper sticker destroyed.
Cheers!