• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When Will Trump Standup Against Bigotry and Racism?

When will Trump standup against racism and bigotry?


  • Total voters
    54
"Nazis only murder people because of the left."

So should I point out the obvious lie that you're trying to promote there, or are you still incapable of introspection?
 
So should I point out the obvious lie that you're trying to promote there, or are you still incapable of introspection?

"Don't blame nazis when they murder, blame lefties."
 
"Don't blame nazis when they murder, blame lefties."

Now, by your own definition. You're the one promoting racism.

Gives me some good quotes to come back to. Because they are perfectly in context and you're the one promoting it all in your own postings.
 
Well, according to some of our more ill-educated peers here on DP, Nazis were lefties.

If we hold them to their rhetoric, they never make sense.
 
Pathetic.

Say all you want. But you've just been promoting racism for the your last few post.

So you're still indicating yourself in your own post once again. Because the way you've been behaving this entire time has been pathetic.

I asked you a simple question and you devolved into racism. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
There is no way to draw out that he was promoting racism. By acknowledging that there were actually good people on both sides of the conflict that day.

I think it was inevitable that a pro-Trumper and anti-Trumper were never going to agree on whether that statement, or any others he made are racist.
 
I think it was inevitable that a pro-Trumper and anti-Trumper were never going to agree on whether that statement, or any others he made are racist.

Then you're making it sound like no matter what he says. No one on the anti-trump side of this will ever be happy.
We have very easy to define parameters for what is and isn't a racist statement.

Now Trump has said things that I both do not like and that I don't particularly care for. But the amount of people that have come forward to claim something, no matter how old, or how obscure he's ever stated, as racist. Is astounding to me and we've seen time and time again. That many of these are either third, or even fourth hand accounts. Taken far out of context as what happened with his calling MS13 members animals and everyone's attempts to claim that he was saying that about all immigrants, or completely and utter lies right from the start.

A wall, is not racist. Calling a country a ****hole country, is not a racist statement. Yes it's a rude statement and crass as all hell. But not racist.

This is probably the simplest stance I can ever have with the anti-Trump crowd.
 
Then you're making it sound like no matter what he says. No one on the anti-trump side of this will ever be happy.
We have very easy to define parameters for what is and isn't a racist statement.

Just calling it like I see it. The guy might lie like all hell when it comes to details, but when it comes to emotion he wears his heart on his sleeve. And's a dark ugly one.
 
Just calling it like I see it. The guy might lie like all hell when it comes to details, but when it comes to emotion he wears his heart on his sleeve. And's a dark ugly one.

That in no way proves he promotes racism. I could care less if he wore his heart on his sleeve, at least it makes him readable in most cases and it makes him appear more human than the last jackass.

I also don't care for the lies. Those little lies he tells to protect his own ego are something that those of us who've seen him on TV for years now. Is something that we've come to understand is an inseparable part of his personality. Yet when I see groups coming forward to fact check his jokes and his little jabs, it makes me and those like me. Roll our eyes in the same kind of disgust that we've been doing over the exact same thing, over and over.

If you want to call it like you see it. Then say that you believe he promotes racism and start from there. Don't tout it like it's an immutable fact of reality.
 
Well, according to some of our more ill-educated peers here on DP, Nazis were lefties.
They were and the only ill-educated ones are the ones who do not understand how thiat is. They are the kind of people who swallowed the shallow and biased information they got in public school and who read their New York Times and whatnots in the morning, thinking they are enlightened and benevolent because they have a college diploma and a "humanitarian heart" (although they never really ever even had coffee with a minority cab driver).
 
They were and the only ill-educated ones are the ones who do not understand how thiat is. They are the kind of people who swallowed the shallow and biased information they got in public school and who read their New York Times and whatnots in the morning, thinking they are enlightened and benevolent because they have a college diploma and a "humanitarian heart" (although they never really ever even had coffee with a minority cab driver).

Too much Tucker Carlson ^
 
Too much Tucker Carlson ^
Who the heck is Tucker Carlson? I am Swedish and my knowledge of American media personalities is highly limited.

I do not get my knowledge from people on television. In fact, I have not even watched television for 10 years now.

PS. ^ Typical teenage-girl tactic of shaming and ridiculing rather than the more masculine and mature variant of reasoning and asking questions.
 
Who the heck is Tucker Carlson? I am Swedish and my knowledge of American media personalities is highly limited.

I do not get my knowledge from people on television. In fact, I have not even watched television for 10 years now.

Oh, you’re Swedish. Well then, some Swedish moron convinced you the Nazis were left-wing.
 
Oh for chrissakes, read one of the 100 threads on the topic. I’m not rehashing it.
Why not? This is a very important question and a highly interesting one that is also in line with the topic matter in question.

It seems rather undisputable that National Socialism is a Left Wing ideology because it is rooted in Collectivism and also does it believe in nationalisation not only of certain services, but - more importantly - of people and, additionally, an ideology that opposes laissez faire economics. The platform of Swedish Social Demcorats is very similar to that of the NSDAP, for example (which is not too surprising as the two parties were close friends and both parties embody the typical, Northern European Social Democratic soul).

See, the distinction between Left and Right is fairly simple; the previous stand for interventionism whereas the latter stand for self-ownership. The Left does not appreciate individual variation and want to homogenise all individuals into one Collectivist blob of "equality". The Right believes individual variation is natural and thus something that ought to be respected. The Left does not believe in property and is therefore more likely to start wars than The Right, because The Right values property. The Left speaks of positive rights whereas The Right only believes in negative rights.

Hitler was no fan of laissez faire economics. In fact he hated it. Neitjer was Hitler a fan of non-interventionism, in fact he loved interventionism so much that his goal was to take over the whole world. Although Hitler did not go so far as to kill the bourgeosie, he still did expropriate their property. The idea he presented might not have been to nationalise the entire economy, but in its place, he did "nationalise the population" in the name of creating a homogenous blob of equality. To "nationalise the population" he pushed Identity Politics into the most absurd of absurdums, namely genocide. Furthermore, he wanted a government dictated development (Progressivism) and was a big fan of regulations and other kinds of market interventionism.

Hitler was not on the Right.

But, wait! If Interventionism equals Leftism, does not that mean that all modern day political parties are Lefti Wing too? Yes, it does. Esentially, democracy is Left Wing thought as the purpose of the system is to nationalise decision-making and to expropriate the means of private opinions. The Right does not believe in government, they believe in the individual because every person is capable and equally entitled to their own bodies, brains, lives and families. The Right does not believe in intervention; neither in the public nor in the private and this does not only mean that they favour laissez faire economics, but also that they are anti-war and only support "Progressivism" if it is spontaneous, natural and voluntary. Finally, this individualistic nature also means that The Right opposes all forms of Identity Politics, be it quotas or genocide, because such ideas are Collectivist and thus the very polar opposite of Individualism. Democracy draws all parties towards the Left because the only way to win in a democracy is by offering attractive handouts and the only way to maintain power is by enlargening the size of the State.
 
Last edited:
So that's a no on actually supplying evidence and now you're just attacking my alma mater?

Pepperdine by the way. Just in case you were wondering.

I've seen no evidence so far that even suggest that Trump promotes racism. Despite all of the claims and all of the same repeated rhetoric that keeps getting thrown my way. I've seen nothing that even comes close to what people are trying to claim and I've seen people claim he was secretly transporting jews, latinos and gays into hidden death camps. So yes, forgive me if I am taking your opinion with more than a few grains of salt.

I've seen people like Pelosi claim that he is racist, because the wall was racist. I've got people in my facility right now that believe less crazy **** than that and several have Jesus listed as an emergency contact.

Pic one thing, just one and we can start from there.

So it's not on the institution. Can't say that is really a surprise.
 
He doesn't draft laws. There are laws against running people over with cars. There are hate crime laws already on the books. You are posturing, your point is completely hollow.

Again -

Where's the call for laws against all that?
 
You completely missed the point of my posting.

You have joined the CCC, aka the Clueless Conservative Club.

Congratulations!
 
Great job, Born Free! Your WHATABOUT post is in at number 3. You are a giant among DP posters. Walk proud.

Five hundred years from now, uncontacted primitive tribes in South America might be seen using faded Polaroid copies of that Farrakhan photo op as a form of money. Beyond that, a trillion of them won't get you a partially eaten booger sandwich in a subway station toilet in Flatbush.
 
You can't promise anything, you don't know anything.

Let's start with your Obama's idea of foreign policy then we can compare that to Trump.

Putin told Obama to stay out of Crimea and he said yes sir. Stupidity
*
Putin told Obama to NOT sell arms to Ukrainian and he said yes sir. Stupidity
*
Putin told Obama to NOT put our missile defense shield in NATO, he again says yes sir. Stupidity
*
Obama yells out his RED LINE to Syria to never use WMD’s on its people again, Yet Syria walked all over Obama’s RED LINE. Putin told Obama to stay out and Obama says Yes Sir. Coward.
*
Obama asked Putin of all people to certify that all of Syria’s WMD were taking out of Syria and Putin lied to Obama. Stupidity
*
Obama told Russia that once he is reelected he can be more flexible to what Putin wants. How stupid was that. Obama loved Putin and did whatever Putin wanted. Watch the video. Stupidity
*
video of Obama telling russia he can be more flexable - Yahoo Video Search Results
*
Obama was in office and what did he do to shut down NK’s nuclear program. Absolutely nothing. Obama was a stupid coward.
*
Obama cuts a deal with Iran to delay the making of nukes for 10 yrs and the agreement does not have inspections anywhere anytime. Not only that, no one can inspect any of Iran’s military bases.
*
Further Obama flies into Iran in the middle of the night billions in cash to Iran (which was a demand by Iran) so that they could fund their terrorist groups without the cash being traced. Stupidity
*
Obama pulls out of Iraq and leaves ISIS to materialize and when they do he calls them the JV Team. However that JV Team was not JV at all, making Obama to go back into Iraq to try to eradicate ISIS by tying the hands of our military. Thus he could not eradicate ISIS. Stupidity
*
Obama, the then national security adviser Susan Rice claims that Bergdahl served with "honor and distinction." Of which Obama trades five terrorist from Clubgetmo to release a trader to this country. Further Obama holds a bizarre White House Rose Garden ceremony with Bergdahl's parents. Stupidity.
*
Obama bombs the crap out of Libya and walks away. And in doing so the resistance builds and raids our embassy killing four of our own. And Obama goes around calling it a protest of some stupid video. How stupid can this dumbass be?
*
Obama came up with Fast and Furious selling arms to the Mexican drug cartels in an effort to trace those arms but the Administration lost track of the arms and one of those arms was used to shoot and kill one of our border patrol agents. Stupidity
*
Obama campaigned on closing Clubgetmo, guess what it’s still open. Stupidity
*
Obama, did what to get NATO to get them to pay their fair share which is 2% of their GDP, but none of them were paying up except the US paying our share and subsidizing them. Stupidity
*
What did Obama do to get China to stop them from stealing our intellectual capital and ripping us off on their tariffs. He did nothing.
*
What did Obama do with NAFTA from ripping us off. Not a damn thing
*
What did Obama do to pull in NK's nuke program. Not a damn thing, in fact Obama let NK build all the nukes and missiles they wanted.

I can go on!!!!!

Obama owns you. He's all over your brain all day, every day. It's actually funny watching you meltdown over someone who has been out of office for over almost 2 1/2 years. The funny thing is, even after this fact has been pointed out to you numerous times, not only do you not learn your lesson and stop showing the entire forum your self destructive obsession, you double, triple, quadruple down and continue to show just how serious this abnormal obsession is. Basically you are a mental slave to Obama. Think about this fact for a minute. :laughat:
 
Back
Top Bottom