..... were you going to explain and start the discussion or was that it?
I was too busy to post for a few hours.
I read the title and the OP. I read nota's links, and I googled.
Then I read what other people were saying, and what they saying is blackface and not. The Paint Dat Face controversy was easy to understand.
A makeup artist transformed the white woman on the left, to the dark skinned woman on the right. Many were saying it was black face, and just because it looks more glamorous than traditional blackface, it's still blackface. Not only because of the dark make up and contacts, but because of the clothing and headdress. Their POV is that blackface is treating blackness as a costume, and they viewed the artist's use of clothing as a prop and a costume. Therefore, it's not just a white person darkening their skin with tanning and makeup, but it is transforming a woman into another race with makeup and costume clothing.
Being black, they say, is not a costume. Blackface, is a costume.
I found it easy to understand and relate to. For example, I constantly hear minorities of all races complain that politicians use minorities as a props. It happens on the right and the left. The Democratic women on "The Squad" fight with Pelosi and the whole party, because they feel they are often used as props.
I feel it's an legitimate complaint and opinion.
The the complaints I read online, were well reasoned. They seem to be intelligent women, and not all of them are just trolling.
The other woman you posted, looks Asian. Yes, her skin is darker and she looks good, but the photos themselves lack the same controversy as Paint Dat Face.
Because of the way the OP lacks such perspective and what minorities are actually saying about blackface, I can see Pearson's POV saying the thread is to
jeer at people complaining about blackface. Some people very easily could see this thread as an attempt to ridicule minority women complaining about blackface, because their perspective isn't be treated seriously or given any recognition.