• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

We Already Know There Was Collusion

Mach said:
So Mueller didn't start it? Rosenestein? Then why is it a witch hunt? It wasn't a witch hunt.
They rolled up the FBI counterintelligence investigation into the crime of Russian meddling for team-Trump.
They rolled up Manafort's dirty past and present.
They rolled up Flynn's Turkey criminality.
It was triggered by Trump firing Comey because of the investigation into his campaign.

And they handled them all, without leaks, separated from the meddling White House, because Trump fired Comey.

Not a witch hunt.
Not focused on "collusion".

You all know this, you're just making sound-bite waves and we all know this routine.
Click to expand...

The media started the term "collusion". Your rant was irrelevant to my post.
 
Fletch said:
Who has been charged with collusion so far?
Click to expand...

Collusion? Nobody. Direct interference in the election? 25 indictments, if I remember right.
 
Fletch said:
All Russians
Click to expand...

Surprised?
The investigation was about allegations of Russian interference in the election. He found a bunch of interfering Russians. Along the way some other criminal wrongdoing was uncovered, I guess that's the 'witch-hunt' part I keep hearing about.
 
ralphcdp said:
Remember, Question Authority!
Click to expand...

You like my sig, don'tcha. That's the second time you've quoted it.
Tell you what- here, I give it to you. It's yours now. I'll go change mine to something else.
 
trixare4kids said:
The above poster is correct. You're wrong. Indeed it was the media...
Click to expand...

You can't even get a simple rebuttal correct. Nowhere did I claim that the word "collusion" was not introduced by the media. Try harder.
 
Grand Mal said:
You like my sig, don'tcha. That's the second time you've quoted it.
Tell you what- here, I give it to you. It's yours now. I'll go change mine to something else.
Click to expand...

Of course I like it but you keep it. You seem to need a reminder every once in a while. I know how corrupt US/Canada/... "authority" is/can be.
 
ralphcdp said:
Of course I like it but you keep it. You seem to need a reminder every once in a while. I know how corrupt US/Canada/... "authority" is/can be.
Click to expand...

No you don't. You don't know the half of it. None of us do.
And I don't know what the hell you mean with the 'you seem to need a reminder' crap. I asked you last time you beaked off like that and you passed on explaining yourself. So I'm asking you again- what makes you think I need an occasional reminder from you?
 
Grand Mal said:
No you don't. You don't know the half of it. None of us do.
Click to expand...

If you agree that the evil is so great that we "don't know the half of it", why

Originally Posted by Fletch All Russians

Grand Mal: Surprised?
The investigation was about allegations of Russian interference in the election. He found a bunch of interfering Russians.

It would appear, correct me if I am mistaken, that you just swallowed what fletch/US government said.
 
ralphcdp said:
If you agree that the evil is so great that we "don't know the half of it", why

Originally Posted by Fletch All Russians

Grand Mal: Surprised?
The investigation was about allegations of Russian interference in the election. He found a bunch of interfering Russians.

It would appear, correct me if I am mistaken, that you just swallowed what fletch/US government said.
Click to expand...

Swallowed what? I said Mueller found a bunch of interfering Russians.
Wait a minute Are you saying those Russians actually weren't interfering with the election, that it's all a conspiracy and we've all had the wool pulled over our eyes? All but you, of course. Is that what the word 'swallow' means in your post?
 
Mach said:
You can't even get a simple rebuttal correct. Nowhere did I claim that the word "collusion" was not introduced by the media. Try harder.
Click to expand...

Then what were you arguing?
The other poster said it was the media who started the collusion thing, and then you went off on him, in your usual mocking tone.
 
dobieg said:
That's the spirit.


I admire anyone who can still believe even when they're slapped right in the face with evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

So you've seen the report? What's in it?
 
SCrider said:
No one yet. Just because there have not been any charges does not mean it did not happen.
It will be interesting to see the 3 dozen indictments that are sealed to be released.
Click to expand...

Supposedly , there are no more seal indictments.
 
Grand Mal said:
Surprised?
The investigation was about allegations of Russian interference in the election. He found a bunch of interfering Russians. Along the way some other criminal wrongdoing was uncovered, I guess that's the 'witch-hunt' part I keep hearing about.
Click to expand...

No, the witch hunt was pretending their was a link between Trump and these Russians.
 
Fletch said:
No, the witch hunt was pretending their was a link between Trump and these Russians.
Click to expand...

I didn't realize that you received an advanced copy of Mueller's report to base that conclusion.

I don’t know what’s in the report. I don’t want to speculate on what the worst-case scenario might be. But we do know that the special counsel had been investigating whether the president obstructed justice when he fired James B. Comey, then the F.B.I. director, in May 2017.

Mr. Mueller had also been examining Mr. Trump’s ties to Russia and whether anybody associated with his campaign conspired with the Russians during the 2016 election. Mr. Mueller’s investigation led to charges against more than 30 people, so far. This report has an importance that goes well beyond partisan politics, reflecting an investigation that yielded substantial results -- not least in establishing the degree of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Don’t forget that half a dozen Trump aides have been indicted or convicted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom