If there is no majority for May, or a majority of around 4 seats, May will be seen IMHO as a big loser. She has cost the UK millions of pounds to hold an election, the third vote in 2 years or so and the song remained the same (or worse). May just wasted taxpayer money and people's time if she does not win big and will look like a fool if she actually lost the majority.
That is what you get if you are shortsighted and delusional like PM May.
As well as throwing away 3 years of Tory rule
That too, even if she wins the next election, she could have possibly ruled for 8 more years, now she has to be careful no really opportunistic MP will challenge her leadership.
Or gaining another two, providing she gets a majority.As well as throwing away 3 years of Tory rule
Or gaining another two, providing she gets a majority.
I said in the other thread that having the "original" election of 2020 virtually coincide with Brexit completion might pose problems if the result of that completion were catastrophic for Britain.
That's working on the premise that there'll be no extension of the negotiations agreed between UK and EU.
This whole thing in fact goes very much against the grain of virtually all of Europe.You feel they have to extend, the clocks already ticking.
This whole thing in fact goes very much against the grain of virtually all of Europe.
Nobody here on the continent is really all that interested in what sort of majority she might have achieved, as long as she had enough of one to speak with authority and thus provide somebody qualified to speak at all in negotiations.
The calling of the snap election already resulted in groans, if the exit polls are remotely anything to go by, the groans will now be increasing.
Europe wants this thing over and done with as soon as possible, prolongation of general economic uncertainty being the last thing anyone wants.
One can only speculate but I wouldn't want to bet on any extension of Brexit negos at all.
May is not the only one trying to sell "no deal is better than a bad deal" (note the logical disconnect), some on the other side merely phrase it differently. Like "out is out and 2019 is merely a (de)terminative factor".
But yeah, all conjecture at his point in time.
Yup, that's what her (declared) needed "period of stability" is all about.Too close for comfort, she will hang on like a leech
Yup, that's what her (declared) needed "period of stability" is all about.
She did however look as if she couldn't make up her mind between throwing up or screaming.
One thing to learn from all of this though is that if you want stability, don't go calling for things you don't have to call for.
Like referendums or snap elections.
hung parliament?
how many seats did Labour pick up?
Yup, that's what her (declared) needed "period of stability" is all about.
She did however look as if she couldn't make up her mind between throwing up or screaming.
One thing to learn from all of this though is that if you want stability, don't go calling for things you don't have to call for.
Like referendums or snap elections.
Farage on the BBC seems to think that it will end brexit and force another referendum which if true puts ,e in a difficult spot. I voted for brexit but potentially voted to stall it. However I never voted for May which was the result of brexit unfortunately and I would feel better if we secured our government first before we moved forward with brexit even if that means another vote or a softer brexit.
It looks like you've wobbled like so many others. I've not seen the numbers yet but I think the young have come out, and rejected May and her supporting cast the 'band of bland ' (Messrs Fox, Davies, Duncan Smith et al) where were they during the election?
I think wobbled is fair. I voted for Brexit but not for a May Premiership and what that entailed. It also didn't help that she arrogantly refused to lay out her post Brexit plan.
I voted for Corbyn because I could relate to him. You put all the Brexit stuff to one side and I think that's what it came down to for a lot of voters.