Please show me in any of those editorials where such things were articulated. They are not. Please do not respond to my posts with hyperbole and drivel. If you can not muster an adult response, then no response is warranted. "....its better to remain silent and appear a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt..."
I asked for someone to tell me what the Conservative editorials got wrong about Trump. You did not address the point, but nonetheless saw fit to open your mouth, while contributing nothing.
I find it hysterical that a man makes a wild claim as per above with ZERO substantiation of his statement, yet takes issue with the accuracy of Wikipedia. 1) you get your news from sources that are far less interested in facts that Wikipedia; 2) you obviously did not open that article, which are actual surveys (and several surveys) well sourced and cross-referenced; 3) Wikipedia has been found to be pretty accurate on most matters (
404 Not Found 4) by commenting on my sourcing rather than the content of my post you should yourself to be no better than Trump's defense.....you have non other than to question the process; 5) your actions here were to prefer ignorance to knowledge, falsity to truth. You presented yourself as an example of the ignorance I was calling out.
Your post added NOTHING to the debate. Don't bother responding to my posts if your game is this poor.