The natural attributes of private rights

[Junzhuo Gu]

The natural attributes of private rights
table of Contents
1. Private right is a natural right of man
2. The private right of family property is bestowed by God
3. The protection of private rights is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership
4. Marx's misunderstanding of primitive public ownership
5. The general violations of human rights by society are centered on the violation of private rights
6. Private rights of individuals and families are the core human rights, and the protection of private rights is the basis for establishing social order
7. Private ownership is reasonable selfishness
8. In countries where citizens are deprived of private property rights, slavery becomes inevitable

1. Private right is a natural right of man
Ownership of private property is a natural right of people, and the survival and development of individuals cannot be separated from the use of daily necessities and production tools. The most natural prerequisite for individuals to have the right to use is that they have ownership. Private property rights are natural and human rights. The animal hunting proceeds, naturally belong to their own private, and also belong to their enjoyment, which contains the truth: in the natural state, private rights and use rights or enjoyment rights belong to the same subject. To protect the survival of an individual, it is an inevitable result that an individual owns property ownership and use rights; on the contrary, if an individual's property ownership and use rights are deprived, his personal survival will be threatened, which is bound to be detrimental to his survival.
2. The private right of family property is bestowed by God
The first task that God entrusted to all living entities should be to reproduce offspring. Out of natural instinct, parents must do their best to raise offspring, and children who are not independent share their parents' income unconditionally. The reasonable arrangement of human property ownership must be conducive to the survival of individuals and the upbringing of future generations. Therefore, the property in the family is jointly owned, used and shared, and it is inevitable that a family has its own independent property rights, so the family property rights are granted by God. Human beings raise offspring in the form of a family, and do their best to make private property in the family unit become inevitable.
Calling family property private property should have a long history. All members of the family share property, but from the perspective of society and the country, family property is undoubtedly a private property. Therefore, it is logical to call the property rights of a family private rights.
3. The protection of private rights is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership
This form of family ownership does not deny the individual's private rights. The ownership of family property by an individual reflects the individual's private rights. The private rights of individuals are reflected and protected in family sharing. Although family property is not classified as belonging to individuals, there is no doubt that individual property rights are protected in family sharing.
Private ownership is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership. Even in the form of family ownership, individual private rights must first be protected. The absurdity of public ownership that denies private rights in practice has been fully confirmed.
4. Marx's misunderstanding of primitive public ownership
In the self-sufficient economic form of primitive society, all its wealth is to directly satisfy life, and all its wealth is the means of subsistence. Therefore, it is meaningless to divide the wealth of primitive society into means of production. The means of production is a form of wealth that only appears on the basis of the division of labor and the development of exchange relations. Many people, under a certain organization, use production tools and machines to produce products that are mainly used for exchange, rather than directly used in personal life. In this way, new forms of wealth that are different from the original means of subsistence appeared. In primitive society, production itself is life, the way of life of primitive people.
The primitive society practiced clan property sharing, and the clan was actually a family of blood relatives. Therefore, the so-called public ownership in primitive society is actually family private ownership. Marx regarded the private family of primitive society as primitive communism, and took this erroneous view of him as an important basis for advocating the practice of communism. The theoretical error is fundamental.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

5. The general violations of human rights by society are centered on the violation of private rights
With wealth, you can have a better life. Wealth has become the primary goal of people's competition. The society bullies the small by the big and the strong and the weak. The core lies in plundering wealth and infringing on people's property rights. Around the infringement of property rights, it is bound to infringe people's political rights, freedom of speech, personal rights, and life rights. Infringement of property rights will inevitably be resisted. To suppress and suppress the resistance, it will inevitably infringe and deprive people of their political rights, speech, personal rights, and life rights.
If the property rights of ordinary people are fully protected, there will be no widespread fierce conflicts in society, and there will be no power for the purpose of plundering property, and there is no need to infringe on ordinary people’s political, speech, and personal rights. So property rights are the core of human rights.
Property rights are at the core of social relations, and the degree of protection of personal property rights reflects the level of civilization of the country. A country that completely deprives personal property rights must be extremely bloody and cruel, and people become slaves.
People resent private ownership. They think that private ownership creates adult greed and is the origin and root of social evil. In fact, on the contrary, insufficient protection of private rights is the root of almost all evils in society.
6. Private rights of individuals and families are the core human rights, and the protection of private rights is the basis for establishing social order
Private rights of individuals and families are the core of human rights, and must be at the core of social relations. The ownership of personal and family property is an arrangement of God and has natural attributes, so it is sacred and inviolable. Any violation of these two will inevitably cause social chaos, as a punishment for violations of God's arrangement, as a punishment for violation of nature.
Private ownership of individual households is the most important form of property ownership for mankind. Any more complex form of ownership must be developed on the basis of guaranteeing these two most basic forms of ownership. The forced public ownership that deprives these two basic ownerships will inevitably cause widespread infringement, and will inevitably cause extreme chaos in social property relations, and plunder will inevitably become a common phenomenon.
Even partial denial of the rationality of private rights will bring catastrophic results. Marx's denial of the rationality of private ownership of the means of production directly leads to the denial of the legality of private ownership of land, because land is considered the most important means of production. After the land is publicly owned, the real estate built on public land will naturally become publicly owned. In a country where even the property rights of private houses cannot be protected, private property rights will inevitably suffer the most serious violations. Therefore, as long as the rationality of private rights is partially denied, the result is almost a complete denial of the legality of personal private property rights.
The main contradictions and serious conflicts in reality, and social unfairness to a large extent are attributed to the infringement of private rights. To build social order, it is essential to protect private rights.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

7. Private ownership is reasonable selfishness
Private ownership is reasonable selfishness, which means respecting the reasonable rights of others at the same time. The act of infringing on the reasonable rights of others and gaining improper rights is evil and selfish. Selfishness based on respect for the rights of others is the basis for one's survival, development, self-esteem and self-love. A person who does not even love oneself and does not act for himself will inevitably not love others. Many people generally think that selfishness is the cause of social evil, which is extremely wrong. Reasonable selfishness is the recognition of the reasonable rights of all members of society and everyone, meaning mutual respect, and is one of the most important values ​​on which the healthy development of a society depends. The good of society stems from this reasonable and selfish value concept, while the evil of society stems from the denial and destruction of reasonable selfishness.
Some typical extreme ideas start from denying "selfishness", denying individuals as their own rationality, and then denying private rights and advocating public ownership. As a result, they start with the infringement of citizens' private property ownership and wantonly infringe on almost all civil rights. Reasonable selfishness was denied, public ownership became the personal ownership of the autocratic ruler, and became the ownership of a privileged class, while the ownership of the majority of citizens was deprived.
Taking a high-sounding excuse as the starting point, denying people's reasonable selfishness, the result is the most evil society. The public ownership established on the basis of denying citizens’ reasonable private rights is bound to be in vain, and in fact it has become an important way to strengthen tyranny. Citizens become a complete proletariat with nothing, and even the right to life cannot be guaranteed.
Private rights, which many people think of as the source of all evils, are actually the source of social good. Private rights are denied. As a result, the source of all evils arises from this denial. Full protection of private ownership is the cornerstone of a healthy society.
8. In countries where citizens are deprived of private property rights, slavery becomes inevitable
When citizens were deprived of their private property rights, the family economy and private employment were deemed illegal, and they were strictly prohibited. The citizens did not have the freedom and right to choose their way of life. Citizens can only survive in one way: they are forced to survive in the form of collective labor, and the country as a whole becomes a concentration camp, labor camp, and slavery is the basic state of life for citizens. Therefore, the Marxist theory is the theory of universal slavery, and it is called universal because there is no free class, and this slave system is more cruel than the ancient slave system. The reality in North Korea typically illustrates this point.
People generally have no objection to the protection of personal rights and life rights of individuals, but it becomes uncertain whether people's private property rights should be protected. Without a clear understanding of the serious catastrophic consequences of the widespread and serious infringement of private rights, the disastrous history will inevitably repeat itself, even though the cruel history of mankind has repeatedly reminded people of the importance of protecting private rights.

Gu Junzhuo 2014-3-5

 

[Rich2018]

first, you need to prove that god exists.

 

[swing_voter]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.



Isn't this what you're saying?

 

[soylentgreen]

The natural attributes of private rights
table of Contents
1. Private right is a natural right of man
2. The private right of family property is bestowed by God
3. The protection of private rights is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership
4. Marx's misunderstanding of primitive public ownership
5. The general violations of human rights by society are centered on the violation of private rights
6. Private rights of individuals and families are the core human rights, and the protection of private rights is the basis for establishing social order
7. Private ownership is reasonable selfishness
8. In countries where citizens are deprived of private property rights, slavery becomes inevitable

Let's play the game of , "Can you spot the odd one out? ?

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

Inaccurate. In this article, I try to explore the sanctity and importance of private right from the origin of private right and the important role it plays in the country.

Mankind has insufficient understanding of the importance of private rights, so Marxism will prevail for a while. Although Marxism is declining, there is still a lack of understanding of the importance of private rights. The occurrence of this riot in the United States is also related to a lack of understanding of the value of private rights.

 

[Rich2018]

Inaccurate. In this article, I try to explore the sanctity and importance of private right from the origin of private right and the important role it plays in the country.

Mankind has insufficient understanding of the importance of private rights, so Marxism will prevail for a while. Although Marxism is declining, there is still a lack of understanding of the importance of private rights. The occurrence of this riot in the United States is also related to a lack of understanding of the value of private rights.

Is there a list of "private rights" in your Bible ?

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

first, you need to prove that god exists.

The existence of God cannot be fully proved. But we can explain the existence of an eternal ontology based on existing phenomena and scientific discoveries. This ontology is omnipresent, and we can also speculate that it is omnipotent.

 

[lwf]

Inaccurate. In this article, I try to explore the sanctity and importance of private right from the origin of private right and the important role it plays in the country.

Mankind has insufficient understanding of the importance of private rights, so Marxism will prevail for a while. Although Marxism is declining, there is still a lack of understanding of the importance of private rights. The occurrence of this riot in the United States is also related to a lack of understanding of the value of private rights.

BLM protesters would agree with you that this country has a lack of understanding of the value and importance of human rights. That is, in fact, the very reason they are protesting.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

Is there a list of "private rights" in your Bible ?

of course

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

BLM protesters would agree with you that this country has a lack of understanding of the value and importance of human rights. That is, in fact, the very reason they are protesting.

Talking about human rights in vacant terms is sometimes harmful. What I am going to be here is the importance of private rights.

 

[danielpalos]

The natural attributes of private rights
table of Contents
1. Private right is a natural right of man
2. The private right of family property is bestowed by God
3. The protection of private rights is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership
4. Marx's misunderstanding of primitive public ownership
5. The general violations of human rights by society are centered on the violation of private rights
6. Private rights of individuals and families are the core human rights, and the protection of private rights is the basis for establishing social order
7. Private ownership is reasonable selfishness
8. In countries where citizens are deprived of private property rights, slavery becomes inevitable

1. Private right is a natural right of man
Ownership of private property is a natural right of people, and the survival and development of individuals cannot be separated from the use of daily necessities and production tools. The most natural prerequisite for individuals to have the right to use is that they have ownership. Private property rights are natural and human rights. The animal hunting proceeds, naturally belong to their own private, and also belong to their enjoyment, which contains the truth: in the natural state, private rights and use rights or enjoyment rights belong to the same subject. To protect the survival of an individual, it is an inevitable result that an individual owns property ownership and use rights; on the contrary, if an individual's property ownership and use rights are deprived, his personal survival will be threatened, which is bound to be detrimental to his survival.
2. The private right of family property is bestowed by God
The first task that God entrusted to all living entities should be to reproduce offspring. Out of natural instinct, parents must do their best to raise offspring, and children who are not independent share their parents' income unconditionally. The reasonable arrangement of human property ownership must be conducive to the survival of individuals and the upbringing of future generations. Therefore, the property in the family is jointly owned, used and shared, and it is inevitable that a family has its own independent property rights, so the family property rights are granted by God. Human beings raise offspring in the form of a family, and do their best to make private property in the family unit become inevitable.
Calling family property private property should have a long history. All members of the family share property, but from the perspective of society and the country, family property is undoubtedly a private property. Therefore, it is logical to call the property rights of a family private rights.
3. The protection of private rights is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership
This form of family ownership does not deny the individual's private rights. The ownership of family property by an individual reflects the individual's private rights. The private rights of individuals are reflected and protected in family sharing. Although family property is not classified as belonging to individuals, there is no doubt that individual property rights are protected in family sharing.
Private ownership is the basis of any form of common ownership and public ownership. Even in the form of family ownership, individual private rights must first be protected. The absurdity of public ownership that denies private rights in practice has been fully confirmed.
4. Marx's misunderstanding of primitive public ownership
In the self-sufficient economic form of primitive society, all its wealth is to directly satisfy life, and all its wealth is the means of subsistence. Therefore, it is meaningless to divide the wealth of primitive society into means of production. The means of production is a form of wealth that only appears on the basis of the division of labor and the development of exchange relations. Many people, under a certain organization, use production tools and machines to produce products that are mainly used for exchange, rather than directly used in personal life. In this way, new forms of wealth that are different from the original means of subsistence appeared. In primitive society, production itself is life, the way of life of primitive people.
The primitive society practiced clan property sharing, and the clan was actually a family of blood relatives. Therefore, the so-called public ownership in primitive society is actually family private ownership. Marx regarded the private family of primitive society as primitive communism, and took this erroneous view of him as an important basis for advocating the practice of communism. The theoretical error is fundamental.

How are those rights enforced in public venues? In the US, the judicial branch is vested with the judicial power of the United States.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

How are those rights enforced in public venues? In the US, the judicial branch is vested with the judicial power of the United States.

Although there is a lot of content, the content all talks about the issue of private rights. What I emphasize in this article is the importance of protecting private rights. I think European and American countries have traditionally lacked understanding of the important value of private rights. The Bible hardly explains private rights. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato even had errors in their understanding of private rights. This error is reflected in Plato's "Republic". The U.S. Constitution also lacks an explanation of the importance and sanctity of private rights.

 

[Lutherf]

Although there is a lot of content, the content all talks about the issue of private rights. What I emphasize in this article is the importance of protecting private rights. I think European and American countries have traditionally lacked understanding of the important value of private rights. The Bible hardly explains private rights. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato even had errors in their understanding of private rights. This error is reflected in Plato's "Republic". The U.S. Constitution also lacks an explanation of the importance and sanctity of private rights.

The American left (political left in general) simply does not believe in individual rights. They believe that rights derive from society and that any claims of a society other than the one they envision is unjust and therefore has no legitimate claim of a right to anything. Just look at all these so called protests. You'll hear "Whose streets? Our streets!" as they generally deny access to any area they occupy to any but those that join them. The deny business the right to operate. They deny property owners the right to their windows, doors and walls. The deny law abiding citizens the right to police and fire services. They deny anyone that opposes them the right to a peaceful existence.

This is the America that the Democrats have in store for us with their "Social Justice" system.

 

[Rich2018]

of course

What Book ?

Chapter & Verse ?

 

[Rich2018]

The existence of God cannot be fully proved. But we can explain the existence of an eternal ontology based on existing phenomena and scientific discoveries. This ontology is omnipresent, and we can also speculate that it is omnipotent.

We can explain the origin of the universe with Pixies.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

The American left (political left in general) simply does not believe in individual rights. They believe that rights derive from society and that any claims of a society other than the one they envision is unjust and therefore has no legitimate claim of a right to anything. Just look at all these so called protests. You'll hear "Whose streets? Our streets!" as they generally deny access to any area they occupy to any but those that join them. The deny business the right to operate. They deny property owners the right to their windows, doors and walls. The deny law abiding citizens the right to police and fire services. They deny anyone that opposes them the right to a peaceful existence.

This is the America that the Democrats have in store for us with their "Social Justice" system.

The existence of the American left makes people feel that the United States is also in danger of being communist, just like Venezuela. Therefore, President Trump emphasized that the United States will never implement socialism. In fact, President Trump felt the threat of socialist values. And some leaders of Antafei openly admit to believing in socialism. If the protesters fully respect private rights, they should not become looters, nor should they despise other people’s rights to life and shoot them wantonly. They should be peaceful protesters. I have also heard Democrats’ speeches full of incitement to the lower-class people in the United States, including hatred of the rich. It would be very dangerous to let this go on.

 

[lwf]

Talking about human rights in vacant terms is sometimes harmful. What I am going to be here is the importance of private rights.

Private rights are important, but less important than human rights such as the right to life. By impeding the exercise of private rights, BLM protesters hope to draw attention to the much more serious violation of human rights that occurs when police officers are not held accountable for police brutality.

 

[Rich2018]

Private rights are important, but less important than human rights such as the right to life. By impeding the exercise of private rights, BLM protesters hope to draw attention to the much more serious violation of human rights that occurs when police officers are not held accountable for police brutality.

And how do "private" and "human" rights differ ?

 

[lwf]

And how do "private" and "human" rights differ ?

You don't need the right to private ownership to have basic human rights.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

What Book ?

Chapter & Verse ?

《The Republic》 When discussing the defenders of the country in Chapter 5, it is believed that in order to defend the country wholeheartedly, the defenders should not have personal property. It also advocates that women and children should be shared among defenders.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

We can explain the origin of the universe with Pixies.

If you think that all the laws of nature are spirits, what you say makes sense. But you blaspheme the gods, it is difficult to get the blessings of the gods.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

Private rights are important, but less important than human rights such as the right to life. By impeding the exercise of private rights, BLM protesters hope to draw attention to the much more serious violation of human rights that occurs when police officers are not held accountable for police brutality.

Private rights are like everyone’s shield or last refuge. If the deprivation of private rights becomes a common phenomenon in a country, everyone in this country loses the most basic guarantee, and everyone's right to life becomes very fragile and vulnerable.

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

And how do "private" and "human" rights differ ?

Human rights are a whole, but this does not prevent us from dividing human rights into three major categories: economic rights, political rights, and life rights. Economic rights mainly include private rights, independent exchange rights and independent labor rights.