Not the one in this thread do you have that one? is it in the other thread?
I'll try and find it. It was the one from overhead from the helicopter. I'd like to look at it again.
ok thank you!
theres one earlier in this thread (post 18) but it doesnt seem to show anything really. The chopper is just rounding the corner and basically 1,2 seconds after you can see stephon he is being shot.
ok thank you!
theres one earlier in this thread (post 18) but it doesnt seem to show anything really. The chopper is just rounding the corner and basically 1,2 seconds after you can see stephon he is being shot.
Here's one. It's hard to tell exactly, but I think he is facing them when he falls?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/us/stephon-clark-independent-autopsy.html
I'm on the right and even to me, this shooting doesn't sound right. Hopefully they have body cam footage. If not, the forensic evidence between both coroners will be brought forth and the grand jury will either see evidence that contradicts between coroners, or evidence that confirms the forensic findings.
At this point, I don't know. But if that report (linked) is accurate. The cops are in for a world of trouble.
That doesn't bode well. They will get off anyway.
I guess I should change my tune on this shooting, when I watched the video of him running and hoping fences (still should not have done that) it wasn't as outrageous as people were making but shooting in the back is bad
Absolutely horrible. No doubt this will be brought before a grand jury and charges likely (should be) pressed. When you read the details in the article, you'll see why. I'm curious what the body cameras (hopefully available) show. Really bad.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
Stephon Clark, the unarmed African American man whose shooting by police has caused protests and national outcry, was shot six times in the back, an independent forensic pathologist said Friday.
Dr. Bennet Omalu conducted an autopsy days after Clark was killed by police. He told reporters that his examination showed that Clark was hit by eight bullets, and all but one entered while his back was facing police.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
I hear he was just walking down the street minding his own business and the cops shot him.
How “reputable “ does one need to be to determine the front from the back?
Not sure why you think your personal criminal history is relevant to proper police procedure.I can tell ya one thing, I've never had reason to run from LE nor have I ever given them reason to chase me...
Not sure what you're contending here. That a deaf, impaired or inebriated person can't break a car window? That as soon as someone breaks a car window cops can start shooting at anyone that runs from them?the things you are talking about are totally different from what this guy did...LE was in the vicinity because there were reports of someone going through the neighborhood breaking people's windows...
I dont see his hands out at all or an object. doesnt mean they are not i just dont see any evidence on the video that is clear in anyway. when he falls he falls facing the back of the yard, you then see his arms clealry come out.
another thing that bothers me is the speed which the one cop yells gun ( i mean if you see gun you yell it i get that) but he says show me your hands (a terrible command IMO) and then yells gun so quickly seemingly before they have a real beat on him. Then they retreat for a second, why poke your head back out and give more commands if you thought there was a gun? I have zero police training but that certainly wasnt my training in home self defense. Anyway they peak back around the corner, say show me your hands again, he yells gun gun gun again and they open fire.
As for wrong doing, i guess the more that comes out the more we will know either way. Being a cop is a hard job, one that many times goes way under-praised because the good stuff is expected and taken for granted while the bad stuff is tv news. i have cops and troopers has family and friends and i want them to come home safe but there is risk with the job. Im just always gonna have some issues when things escalate this fast over (known at the time) a POSSIBLE vandal. now NONE of my LEO friends and family are the authority on all matters and NONE of them most certainly were there so they dont know for sure. But looking at everything available to us so far (havent had time to talk to them about this new info of possible shoots in the back) none of them feel the cops responded probably starting with no identification, bad commands and quick escalation. The trooper also stated, like i mentioned above, that him and his fellow trooper would NEVER identify gun then retreat, then peak again in that situation.manner these cops did (place to fall back to, outdoors, no shots fired, no victims etc) (oh and it was also brought up about their lack of proper response after he was down)
Anyway its impossible NOT to think poor training, execution of training and or faulty personnel are not at fault in many of these cases. When we have videos of people attacking the police with a knife or fighting with them and reaching for their gun or being a KNOWN murder/terrorist and NOT being killed or even shot and then we have people shot with no weapon or choked to death over misdemeanors it makes little sense. Of course NO training and conduct will ever be perfect but it seems like we have much work to do.
Im greatly in favor of body cams on all officers at all times with redundancy systems and no ability to disable them.
That....and why would we be looking at bullet holes on a body to figure out what happened when we have the videos?Yes, the 'show me your hands' was a very poor choice, imo. This case is clearly one that should never have gone this far. As you said, escalating this fast over vandalism is questionable at best. It's also odd that a helicopter would be involved in such a police call as well.
I also see him fall forward into the backyard. Which is why I don't understand how he can be shot in the back? I'm not seeing something, or he wasn't shot in the back.
Not sure why you think your personal criminal history is relevant to proper police procedure.
Not sure what you're contending here. That a deaf, impaired or inebriated person can't break a car window? That as soon as someone breaks a car window cops can start shooting at anyone that runs from them?
Absolutely horrible. No doubt this will be brought before a grand jury and charges likely (should be) pressed. When you read the details in the article, you'll see why. I'm curious what the body cameras (hopefully available) show. Really bad.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
Stephon Clark, the unarmed African American man whose shooting by police has caused protests and national outcry, was shot six times in the back, an independent forensic pathologist said Friday.
Dr. Bennet Omalu conducted an autopsy days after Clark was killed by police. He told reporters that his examination showed that Clark was hit by eight bullets, and all but one entered while his back was facing police.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
I don't know. I think it would be hard to disguise entry and exit wounds to a FP. Seen a few of them myself.
Because you went there first with my personal criminal history to begin with, not me...your arguments are irrelevant to this situation of a thug out to deliberately break the law...that's why...stick to the subject...
And it wasn't "as soon as someone breaks a car window"...he was running through the neighborhood to escape police...
It is a natural reaction for some people to run when the cops arrive, especially with a helicopter spotlight being shined on you.
The video reminded me of chasing and treeing raccoons.
My fine upstanding young nephew also ran from the police as they arrived at an early evening beer keg party. He was underage at the time. It's not the right thing to do, but it is a natural reaction for many.
Well, yeah, exactly...if you are doing something wrong, you run...that was my point...the cops know that...everyone knows that...
The underground slime being thrown at the assassinated African American is worth noting.
These murderers are no better than any mass shooter, and the chair is too good for them.
Let them be sentenced to hard labor in a prison with every known gang ...
Well, you seemed to have this theory about criminal behavior (small crimes lead to big crimes) that was pretty absurd. I just used you as an example, to show you how your theory made no sense. It's called reducto ad absurdium. By continuing to insist that despite possible small crimes you are a good citizen, only weakens your original argument.Because you went there first with my personal criminal history to begin with, not me...your arguments are irrelevant to this situation of a thug out to deliberately break the law...that's why...stick to the subject...
Ok, so there is certain distance they have to run before we can shoot them? You're not defining what you think is acceptable in any intelligible way.And it wasn't "as soon as someone breaks a car window"...he was running through the neighborhood to escape police...
Absolutely horrible. No doubt this will be brought before a grand jury and charges likely (should be) pressed. When you read the details in the article, you'll see why. I'm curious what the body cameras (hopefully available) show. Really bad.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
Stephon Clark, the unarmed African American man whose shooting by police has caused protests and national outcry, was shot six times in the back, an independent forensic pathologist said Friday.
Dr. Bennet Omalu conducted an autopsy days after Clark was killed by police. He told reporters that his examination showed that Clark was hit by eight bullets, and all but one entered while his back was facing police.
Stephon Clark was shot six times in the back, independent autopsy finds
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
I've seen too many -it does get wearing over the years- being an xray tech and working a lot of ER over the years. Unless clothing or another object impedes the exit would, it'll look different than an entrance wound. If the exit is shored by something external like furniture, clothes, or a wall, the exit wound can look like an entrance wound, with a circular defect or abrasion around the edges. A FP can tell the difference with a microscopic exam.I don't know. I think it would be hard to disguise entry and exit wounds to a FP. Seen a few of them myself.