• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem

Loulit01

Loulit01

Leftist Filth
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
17,139
Reaction score
22,996
Location
Alone in the Pale Moonlight
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
First they came for The Bluest Eye, by an author who holds a Nobel Prize for Literature.
In the Night Kitchen, holder of a Caldecott Honor Book award for children's literature, attacked.
Then they banned the penguins. The happy little penguin book, gone.
Now, not even goblins are safe.

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem​

www.motherjones.com

Moms for Liberty has a nudity problem

The group is censoring classic books—and "silly, naked goblin butts”—claiming they harm kids.
www.motherjones.com www.motherjones.com
​


It's not the goblin butt that's offensive, it's books in general. These people hate and fear books: They never read them; they don't understand them; kids are better off without them.
 
Loulit01 said:
First they came for The Bluest Eye, by an author who holds a Nobel Prize for Literature.
In the Night Kitchen, holder of a Caldecott Honor Book award for children's literature, attacked.
Then they banned the penguins. The happy little penguin book, gone.
Now, not even goblins are safe.

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem​

www.motherjones.com

Moms for Liberty has a nudity problem

The group is censoring classic books—and "silly, naked goblin butts”—claiming they harm kids.
www.motherjones.com www.motherjones.com
​


It's not the goblin butt that's offensive, it's books in general. These people hate and fear books: They never read them; they don't understand them; kids are better off without them.
Click to expand...

"Moms for Liberty," aka the Klanned Karenhood.
 
Loulit01 said:
First they came for The Bluest Eye, by an author who holds a Nobel Prize for Literature.
In the Night Kitchen, holder of a Caldecott Honor Book award for children's literature, attacked.
Then they banned the penguins. The happy little penguin book, gone.
Now, not even goblins are safe.

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem​

www.motherjones.com

Moms for Liberty has a nudity problem

The group is censoring classic books—and "silly, naked goblin butts”—claiming they harm kids.
www.motherjones.com www.motherjones.com
​


It's not the goblin butt that's offensive, it's books in general. These people hate and fear books: They never read them; they don't understand them; kids are better off without them.
Click to expand...
‘In the Night Kitchen’ was literally my daughters favorite book for a while when growing up.

I dont think it was the minimal nudity.
 
Loulit01 said:
First they came for The Bluest Eye, by an author who holds a Nobel Prize for Literature.
In the Night Kitchen, holder of a Caldecott Honor Book award for children's literature, attacked.
Then they banned the penguins. The happy little penguin book, gone.
Now, not even goblins are safe.

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem​

www.motherjones.com

Moms for Liberty has a nudity problem

The group is censoring classic books—and "silly, naked goblin butts”—claiming they harm kids.
www.motherjones.com www.motherjones.com
​


It's not the goblin butt that's offensive, it's books in general. These people hate and fear books: They never read them; they don't understand them; kids are better off without them.
Click to expand...
Moms for Liberty are, at their core, just dirty little hypocrites who love themselves some threesomes...
 
Hamish Howl said:
They're literal Nazis, the ****ers quote Adolf Hitler. They should be publicly mocked until they move to another country.
Click to expand...

Agreed.

I, too, really despise goblins, but it's not on account of freely quoting Nazis - far from it; it's the not wearing pants where the line was crossed.

MAGA.
 
It's not about the books. It's about control. If they can't control the messaging in a book, they don't want anyone to read it. Once there is nothing but bible stories left they might be happy.
 
BitterPill said:
Until Goblins learn to wear pants, we don't need those swarthy, woke pedophiles around our children, ever!

MAGA.
Click to expand...
What if the swarthy woke pedophiles said MAGA and wore make america great again hats instead?
 
bomberfox said:
What if the swarthy woke pedophiles said MAGA and wore make america great again hats instead?
Click to expand...

Those goblin thugs are better off clothing themselves with MAGA Speedos first. Coincidentally, I recently received a shipment from China, so if there are any goblins about, they can PM me for the price.

MAGA.
 
BitterPill said:
Those goblin thugs are better off clothing themselves with MAGA Speedos first. Coincidentally, I recently received a shipment from China, so if there are any goblins about, they can PM me for the price.

MAGA.
Click to expand...

[Brando]
"You would link to this thing, on this, the day of my daughter's wedding."
[/Brando]
 
Loulit01 said:
First they came for The Bluest Eye, by an author who holds a Nobel Prize for Literature.
In the Night Kitchen, holder of a Caldecott Honor Book award for children's literature, attacked.
Then they banned the penguins. The happy little penguin book, gone.
Now, not even goblins are safe.

Moms for Liberty Has a Nudity Problem​

www.motherjones.com

Moms for Liberty has a nudity problem

The group is censoring classic books—and "silly, naked goblin butts”—claiming they harm kids.
www.motherjones.com www.motherjones.com
​


It's not the goblin butt that's offensive, it's books in general. These people hate and fear books: They never read them; they don't understand them; kids are better off without them.
Click to expand...
I mean that sounds like liberty to mean, but considering they've called people pedophiles for less this is pretty amazing.
 
Funny how MJ focuses here on the images rather than the overall content of the books.

We have an age limiting rating system for Movies, why not for books?
 
Schweddy said:
Funny how MJ focuses here on the images rather than the overall content of the books.
Click to expand...
Ok, I'm interested. What would that change? Are you familiar with the books? What content do you find questionable, to the point that the majority of people would support banning these books, if only they knew?
Schweddy said:
We have an age limiting rating system for Movies, why not for books?
Click to expand...
Probably because it's a solution looking for a problem. Getting kids to read books these days is a challenge - my 11 year old is at the top of his class academically, loves learning through documentaries, etc, but the only fiction he's into reading is graphic novels, if he reads at all.

Also ... the age limiting rating system for movies is kinda obsolete at this point. Nobody rents movies anymore, there is no external gatekeeper checking ID's before a kid hits play on Netflix. If anything, it creates more desire to watch the naughty content...like, does anyone still believe prohibition of any kind works? I'd love to see the logical explanation as to why, if so. The most repressed societies are always the most "deviant", without fail or exception.

I will say there are multiple websites a parent can go visit to look up the accebtability of content for kids. And no, those sites do not agree, the parent is free to pick the site that most closely resembles their values. Let them police their kids. Because catering to these Karens means that MY rights and desires are not being adhered to... at what point do I get to have MY tantrum? Nah...better to tell these cows to get back in their lane, and let teachers teach.
 
OlNate said:
Ok, I'm interested. What would that change? Are you familiar with the books? What content do you find questionable, to the point that the majority of people would support banning these books, if only they knew?
Click to expand...
If you were familiar with Moms for Liberty, you would know that they are concerned about trans and homosexual content being available to under aged children.
There are studies that have linked negative development for kids being exposed to any type of pornographic material - including content about death.

I have zero problem with the books being published, but I do have an issue with that content being available to a 5 year old without the parents knowledge or consent.
That's wrong, regardless of the content.

The old argument is that it's up to the parents... well that is what they are doing. If you disagree, create XYZ club attend ISD meetings and do the opposite.

Or, you could stay in ignorance of the topic and call them Nazi's.
 
Schweddy said:
If you were familiar with Moms for Liberty, you would know that they are concerned about trans and homosexual content being available to under aged children.
There are studies that have linked negative development for kids being exposed to any type of pornographic material - including content about death.

I have zero problem with the books being published, but I do have an issue with that content being available to a 5 year old without the parents knowledge or consent.
That's wrong, regardless of the content.

The old argument is that it's up to the parents... well that is what they are doing. If you disagree, create XYZ club attend ISD meetings and do the opposite.

Or, you could stay in ignorance of the topic and call them Nazi's.
Click to expand...
How does a 5 year old get hold of a book without their parents knowledge?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom