Samhain
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,939
- Reaction score
- 2,131
- Location
- Northern Ohio
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Actually I hesitated when I used "throw the election", rather than "influence the election", and I'm still not sure which is appropriate.
The reason I say this, is the released emails surely - in my mind - influenced enough voters to flip those razor thin wins in the 3 Electoral College states that gave Trump the win (MI, WI, PA).
No one knew that at the time, so the proper term then would seem to be "influenced". But with the emails seemingly being one of the key components giving Trump the win, it also could be argued the emails indeed flipped the election. Of course the same could be said of Comey's statement and perhaps several other things, so I suppose "influenced" would have been my better choice.
I can agree that influencing or disrupting was an intent of releasing the emails, but a foreign power didn't write them. One could argue that there is no difference between the Washington Post(Pentagon Papers) releasing stolen information and Wikileaks(DNC Emails) releasing stolen information or myself releasing stolen information, as the end result would be a change in the political pulse if such information was damaging to anyone.
Influencing opinion is, in all practicality, covered as free speech, regardless if the information is real or fake, domestic or foreign. After all, nobody called for the arrest of Vincente Fox who routinely made statements in relation to the 2016 election.