Man who called police on black woman at North Carolina pool no longer has job

[Excon]

what establishes the validity of my position is that the employer agrees with me, as demonstrated by the termination of the racist pool manager

and it appears there is no instance which can be shown where the police were called to address a white woman's attempt to gain access to the pool. clearly, there was disparate treatment of this black resident

iLOL You agree with someone who is wrong and therefore you are right? Not!

You have shown no racism on his part, so stop lying about the man and your invalid position.

 

[justabubba]

iLOL You agree with someone who is wrong and therefore you are right? Not!

You have shown no racism on his part, so stop lying about the man and your invalid position.

then you want us to believe the guy was fired for a reason other than his display of racism ... then tell us what did prompt his termination

 

[Excon]

then you want us to believe the guy was fired for a reason other than his display of racism ... then tell us what did prompt his termination

There was no display of racism, nor can you show any occurred.

 

[justabubba]

There was no display of racism, nor can you show any occurred.

then why was the guy fired by the employer who apologized for his actions

 

[Excon]

then why was the guy fired by the employer who apologized for his actions

Are you really going to play this naive?
When no racism can be shown to have occurred it is because the employer was mistaken in reason, and didn't want bad publicity.

 

[justabubba]

Are you really going to play this naive?
When no racism can be shown to have occurred it is because the employer was mistaken in reason, and didn't want bad publicity.

the employer did not want bad publicity to result because they knowingly employed a racist, who committed racist acts for which the employer had to apologize

 

[Excon]

the employer did not want bad publicity to result because they knowingly employed a racist, who committed racist acts for which the employer had to apologize

iLOL Wrong again. They made an incorrect assumption. Bloom isn't a racist.

 

[justabubba]

iLOL Wrong again. They made an incorrect assumption. Bloom isn't a racist.

the folks who knew the guy decided he was a racist and fired his ass
if he wasn't a racist, they would not have fired him over this incident and apologized for its having occurred

 

[Excon]

the folks who knew the guy decided he was a racist and fired his ass
if he wasn't a racist, they would not have fired him over this incident and apologized for its having occurred

Oy vey.
They made a bad decision based on a false claim. That is clearly evidenced from what actually occurred.

Again you can not show anything racist in what occurred. My Bloom isn't a racist and you should be ashamed for making the false claim that he is.

 

[justabubba]

Oy vey.
They made a bad decision based on a false claim. That is clearly evidenced from what actually occurred.

Again you can not show anything racist in what occurred. My Bloom isn't a racist and you should be ashamed for making the false claim that he is.

the proof of racism is that the employer fired the employee for exhibiting it

 

[Excon]

the proof of racism is that the employer fired the employee for exhibiting it

Wrong. That is not proof of racism on his part.

And again you fail to actually show any racism on his part.
You really should be ashamed for calling a person a racist when they are not.