• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lisa Page will not appear for Capitol Hill interview despite subpoena, attorney says

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,461
Reaction score
33,781
Location
Western Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Lisa Page will not appear for Capitol Hill interview despite subpoena, attorney says | Fox News

Former FBI attorney Lisa Page will not appear for a private interview with two House committees despite being subpoenaed, her attorney told Fox News Tuesday.




In a statement, Amy Jeffress said her client did not have enough time to prepare and had asked the the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees to schedule another date.
Just send US Marshalls to arrest her ass. She needs to fess up about how she and her cohort were going to stop Trump from becoming president.
 
How long does it take to prepare for "on the advice of council, I will not answer that question" or "I will exercise my 5A right and not comment on that matter"? After all, Lisa Page is a lawyer.
 
How long does it take to prepare to tell the truth ??
 
What is the likely/appropriate response to her ignoring the subpoena?
 
Can Congress issue a contempt citation?

Yep, and it could be followed by a fine and/or jail, depending on circumstances. Unless congress gets tough with some of these people, such behavior is likely to continue. It appears they have a lot to hide.
 
Yes. It's part of their oversight authority. Atty General Holder was cited for contempt of Congress.

And didn't seem to much care, as I recall.
 
Lisa Page will not appear for Capitol Hill interview despite subpoena, attorney says | Fox News


Just send US Marshalls to arrest her ass. She needs to fess up about how she and her cohort were going to stop Trump from becoming president.
Unfortunately, it seems the House committees have little appetite or recourse to enforce their subpoenas, to the point it becomes a political sham. We saw this with the Trump administration thumbing its noise at the committees, often not even answering questions when they showed up - if they did show.
 
What is the likely/appropriate response to her ignoring the subpoena?
Nothing.

There is a unique method of enforcement using the Sargent at Arms, but as a practical matter it hasn't happened, or at least it hasn't happened in modern times for most of the last century.

Unfortunately, as we saw with the Trump administration thumbing their noses at the House subpoenas and questioning, these committee testimony sessions have for the most part become political grandstanding.

If the Dems get the House, which I believe is likely, be prepared for this type of activity (committees, investigations, subpoenas, grandstanding) to take-off - but in the other partisan direction.
 
Renato Mariotti:

“Most lawyers wouldn’t let Page testify under these circumstances. She was apparently only given four days notice and was not provided with documents to review in advance.”
 
How long does it take to prepare to tell the truth ??
In my experience, right here among forum posters, the ones who support Hillary are incapable of telling the truth. I'd expect Lisa Page knows she can't tell the truth, she never will. Like Hillary's supporters here, she'll either lie or not answer the question
 
Have Lisa Page and Peter Strzok sit next to each other and answer the questions. That would be a made for TV special.
 
Can Congress issue a contempt citation?

They can, but that would be wildly premature.

The reality here is that they know this is BS, pure political theater, and she obviously knows it's BS, and she wants to put it off as long as she can.
 
Just how far down the food chain can someone be and still tell congress to “pound sand” and get away with it?

It really is time to arrest her ass and explain why she has been “Clintonized”.

You people are really some pretty strange characters! Hilarious as you are pathetic!

Always scared of some boogyman somewhere! LOL!

Without a boogyman to chase you aren't nothing! Just like Donald Trump!
 
Last edited:
This shows us that they are guilty of doing this for Hillary Clinton or trying too. American said it but, I don’t think that Congress can act as a court and, send a warrant for her. Ms. Page is refuse to give her testimony right. There's your answer that she had been involved with this whole thing. I don't know how Congress has the power to do anything


Can’t censor this Patriot
 
I agree, if it's for the partisan obstructionists in the House, giving them the finger seems reasonable.

If they were as credible as the Senate on this matter, perhaps it would be a different story, but as Chomsky said, the House has exposed itself with their absurd conclusions, unwillingness to seriously question people they felt were on their side, Nune's constant partisan games, etc.

Heck, Mueller hasn't even subpoenaed his star witness after a year, but man the house is after Lisa Page for an email!! Chasing after a women about emails again for partisan reasons...where have I seen this broken record before.
 
Just how far down the food chain can someone be and still tell congress to “pound sand” and get away with it?

It really is time to arrest her ass and explain why she has been “Clintonized”.

I know this happened with the Clinton email investigation where her people just said, "screw you" when subpoenaed to appear.
How does one do this and not affect a bench warrant?
 
Nothing.

There is a unique method of enforcement using the Sargent at Arms, but as a practical matter it hasn't happened, or at least it hasn't happened in modern times for most of the last century.

Unfortunately, as we saw with the Trump administration thumbing their noses at the House subpoenas and questioning, these committee testimony sessions have for the most part become political grandstanding.

If the Dems get the House, which I believe is likely, be prepared for this type of activity (committees, investigations, subpoenas, grandstanding) to take-off - but in the other partisan direction.

I'm pretty tired of "this type of activity."

The Bush White House ignored subpoenas, as did the Obama admin.
 
Page has known for months that the committees wanted to talk to her and in the eleventh hour she's not prepared? How much preparedness does it take to tell the truth?

There have been many in the Senate Judiciary that have been requested to appear and were no shows or took the Fifth. Grassley requested Comey and Lynch to appear last month and they both declined. Comey's atty replied and said Comey was out of the country. But Grassley seen him in Iowa. He then wanted to subpoena Lynch and Comey but there is a rule in the Senate Judiciary Committee that requires the Chairman, Grassley and the ranking Democrat Feinstein to agree to subpoena. Feinstein blocked them .

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/18/comey-refuses-testify-congress-mccabe-pleads-fifth/

The House doesn't operate under such a rule. Their list of people being subpoenaed is extensive.


And they want these hearings in public. Strzok has been subpoenaed and has agreed to appear tomorrow in a public hearing. Let's see if he shows.
 
I'm pretty tired of "this type of activity."

The Bush White House ignored subpoenas, as did the Obama admin.

And if the Democrats get control of the House this November, you will get to see the Trump White House ignore the House's subpoenas.
 
Back
Top Bottom