Is this a girl?

[OldFatGuy]

You realize that we are discussing gender identity, not sexual preferences, right? These are two separate issues.

Also, the conflict is occuring in that if the parent allows for the child to express it's own preference, not correcting the child to its physical body is being called influencing the child "preference".

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk

I see no difference. What the parent perceives is not paramount.

 

[OldFatGuy]

no, you

Lame. Thanks for the chuckles.

 

[maquiscat]

I see no difference. What the parent perceives is not paramount.

See no difference in what? Gender identity and sexual preferences? The former is how one views themselves. The later is that they are sexually/romantically attracted to. They are not the same.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk

 

[OldFatGuy]

See no difference in what? Gender identity and sexual preferences? The former is how one views themselves. The later is that they are sexually/romantically attracted to. They are not the same.

Your opinion, not mine. I see them as intertwined and one.

During his latter years, Lou Reed spoke of how his parents had reacted to the feminine aspects of his personality during his adolescence with confusion, adding to his own confusion. He then explained how that confusion delayed his own understanding of his masculinity. And how he now knew all humans experience a duality of gender and sexual preferences which should be recognized as one and the same.

Then he married Laurie Andersen, and died as a man despite moments of androgyny during his lifetime.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

Why the **** are you so concerned with what a three-year old who isn't even your child has between their legs??

That is just the kind of thing you should expect from someone so utterly depraved they have a man being sodomized as their avatar on a political internet forum.

 

[Bodi]

:lamo


:2funny:

I wish that you were a serious scientist like I am... then you would not be laughing.

 

[Phys251]

I wish that you were a serious scientist like I am... then you would not be laughing.

Almost a clever insult, Bodhi. Almost. :lol:

 

[noonereal]

[video=youtube;hF0ZLd_3PMc]Poll: Is this a girl?

Why do you care?

Just what is this to you?

I think your poll is Godawful.

Mean, hurtful, intrusive. Real Trump ****.

 

[Bodi]

Almost a clever insult, Bodhi. Almost. :lol:

...

 

[cpwill]

"Gender Identity" isn't "What you feel" any more than your "Ethnic Identity" or "Species Identity" is.

I understand this has now been stopped (good), though the mother hasn't lost custody and been restrained for child abuse (bad).

 

[bomberfox]

:lamo


:2funny:

Apparently trolling with essentialist crap and spurious claims of common sense is all bod has, including assuming people out of thin air because common sense!

 

[zimmer]

I hope the “Lunatic” mother and Left learned something.

The Texas 7-year-old at the heart of a fierce custody battle due to his mom’s insistence that he wants to transition to life as a girl has opted to go to school as a boy.

7-year-old in gender-transition battle goes to school as boy

 

[maquiscat]

I hope the “Lunatic” mother and Left learned something.



View attachment 67268113

Like what? That the kid may be gender fluid instead of transgender? Of course given that the source of the information is biased towards the dad's view means nothing, nor does the lack of any medical professional with knowledge on transgenderism and non-binary.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk

 

[zimmer]

Like what? That the kid may be gender fluid instead of transgender? Of course given that the source of the information is biased towards the dad's view means nothing, nor does the lack of any medical professional with knowledge on transgenderism and non-binary.

Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk

That the mother is a dangerous lunatic, and Leftists supporting her are insane.

 

[AProudLefty]

That the mother is a dangerous lunatic, and Leftists supporting her are insane.

As dangerous as Rightists brainwashing their kids with Fundamentalist Christianity? Odd that you don't speak out against it as it's widespread when the transgender children are less than 1% of the population.

 

[nota bene]

As dangerous as Rightists brainwashing their kids with Fundamentalist Christianity? Odd that you don't speak out against it as it's widespread when the transgender children are less than 1% of the population.

How about sticking to the topic, which has absolutely nothing to do with "rightists" or "Fundamentalist Christianity"? What a lame whataboutism.

 

[AProudLefty]

How about sticking to the topic, which has absolutely nothing to do with "rightists" or "Fundamentalist Christianity"? What a lame whataboutism.

It's not a whataboutism. Why focus on less than 1% when there's way worse out there? If he really cares about children, he would be going around pointing them out.

 

[Rogue Valley]

Is this a girl?

Are you a male?

 

[nota bene]

It's not a whataboutism. Why focus on less than 1% when there's way worse out there? If he really cares about children, he would be going around pointing them out.

"Rightists" and "Fundamentalist Christians" have nothing to do with this. And why can't others focus on what they please? Why do you think they should be obligated to comment on anything about anything? Does "less than 1%" not matter because there is "way worse out there"?

 

[zimmer]

As dangerous as Rightists brainwashing their kids with Fundamentalist Christianity? Odd that you don't speak out against it as it's widespread when the transgender children are less than 1% of the population.

We’re on the subject of permanent biological damage caused by demented individuals, like this lunatic mother, foisting her insanity on her child.

That damage isn’t just biological either. It traps a person into a state for which change is not easy, and can be tortuous.

People join and leave the church all the time. Can be done over time... or at the snap of the fingers.

Try that with what this insane mother tried to foist on her son.

 

[zimmer]

It's not a whataboutism. Why focus on less than 1% when there's way worse out there? If he really cares about children, he would be going around pointing them out.

Permanent, tortuous damage to a child at the hand of an insane parent... that will bear it’s poisonous fruit when the child becomes an adult is why.

I thought you people “loved the children”?

You believe permanent biological and psychological damage is acceptable... and when these idiocies fail miserably, ahhh... collateral damage... **** ‘em... it’s only a small percentage of society exposed to these Mengele type experiments that have gone badly wrong. Tough **** for those kids... and off to the next Leftist imbecility they go.

 

[roguenuke]

Just some things you've conveniently left out...







So when 11 out of 12 peers listened to the fine details of both the mother and the father's side of the story 11 out of 12 agreed with the mother. This isn't some activist judge who is unilaterally deciding this. These are average people. People from Texas no less. There is no rational reason to think that 11 out of 12 jurors would give full custody to the mother and take it away from the man unless there was a valid reason for thinking the father was the one with the issues.

You really don't seem to have any clue how gender works. Nothing this woman is doing is dangerous or threatening to her child. It sounds to me like the father is the one hell bent on turning is son into some kind of prototype male.

Another fact left out is that the mother was granted an annulment from the father because of his lying, including about his military experience, education, and income. In fact, his military experience itself included a likely lie, since he got out by claiming to be gay.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

 

[roguenuke]

Wrong. The OP asked if the three year-old is a girl and then brought up how being forced to be a girl, by order of the Mother with the backing of the Court, is affecting the child and the father's lives.

The only evidence of Luna being forced to be a girl is from the father, who is a documented liar.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

 

[roguenuke]

Pursuant to all laws in the United States in every state lawful infants have no rights of consent. All rights of the child for consent are within the authority of lawful parents or guardians. While local governments reserve the right to protect children from abuse of any source, consent is not the issue. The judge in this case, was in error not to view this as child abuse and remove the child from both parents immediately for the child's safety. It is time for Child Protective Services to step in, take the family to Family Court, not a matrimonial court (State Supreme Court), for disposition, where the child is the priority, not the parents. And yes, in such instances Family Court judges can over rule State Supreme Court judges. There are many precedences.

Stuff your shock and dismay.

As a father and grandfather to hear or read someone suggest that 7 year old child has the ability to determine the future of his or hers sexual preferences is beyond the pale of absurdity and belief. This child is suffering from the power plays of parents who have failed to place the child away from their own battles. The attorneys representing both parents should be censured for their roles in this debacle. They have failed in their duties as officers of the court.

Transgender and sexual preferences are two different things.

However, it is not uncommon at all for even young kids to have boyfriends or girlfriends. My son had several girlfriends in Kindergarten and I had one boyfriend in first grade. It has nothing to do with sex and everything to do with forming pair bond relationships, learning.

Transgender is not really related to that though, at least not any more than being cisgender is.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

 

[ChezC3]

What is it with the Unthinking Left and their war on children?