- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
- Messages
- 14,757
- Reaction score
- 14,590
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Do you use Southern Comfort as well?Ignorance is comforting for some.
Do you use Southern Comfort as well?Ignorance is comforting for some.
Logically, if the priests were merely "gay", wouldn't they just sodomize each other?Your definition is your own. Not the definition of science. The victims were mostly adolescent boys.
For some species.We don’t eat our young. That happens naturally in biology.
Dude's defending pedophilia. Yikes.Here is a fact for you. The overwhelming number of priests who sexually abused the children were homosexuals. And the acts were homosexual not pedophile.
Well, the Catholic Church had something to do with that banning altar girls, I think.Here is a fact for you. The overwhelming number of priests who sexually abused the children were homosexuals. And the acts were homosexual not pedophile.
Nature isn't conscious, so there can be no "steering". Things just happen, including things that are beneficial because of a convoluted reason, like certain genes controlling to have people who aren't likely to have kids because their siblings have a higher likelihood of kids and their being childless, more likely to be childless means their family is more likely to have more kids survive to procreate themselves, passing on those genes. Or maybe our bodies are just weird.Do you have a link? I would love to read more.
My first guess would be that evolution would create a response to steer their sexual energy toward procreation and away from less productive activities.
Actually it's the opposite. Pedophiles are either sexually attracted to children (regardless of gender) and will choose targets of opportunity or it's a form of power tripping. Rarely do pedophiles violate children because they're attracted to the gender of the child.Here is a fact for you. The overwhelming number of priests who sexually abused the children were homosexuals. And the acts were homosexual not pedophile.
How is that not pedophilia?Your definition is your own. Not the definition of science. The victims were mostly adolescent boys.
Here is a fact for you. The overwhelming number of priests who sexually abused the children were homosexuals. And the acts were homosexual not pedophile.
That’s a disingenuous post at best. Also ignorant as the term minor-attracted person is used by psychological academics as a means of lessening the stigma associated with pedophilia.Dude's defending pedophilia. Yikes.
Typical right wing.
Who said they didn’t sodomize each other too?Logically, if the priests were merely "gay", wouldn't they just sodomize each other?
But instead they went after children.
I guess that didn't cross your mind, huh.
I agree.Who said they didn’t sodomize each other too?
![]()
Declining Homosexuality in the American Priesthood
While the average engaged Catholic continues to show signs of making peace with progressive trends in sexuality and relationship behavior, the same is not true among the clergy. The type of man who completes seminary intending ordination is more conservative about matters of sexuality—as well as othwww.thepublicdiscourse.com
I would say this is splitting hairs. Molesting children 10 years of age and under versus molesting children 11 and up it's still the same problem. The crimes are equally heinous.They are mostly cases of ephebophilia, post pubescent boys. They weren’t prepubescent which is pedophilia. .
They are mostly cases of ephebophilia, post pubescent boys. They weren’t prepubescent which is pedophilia. .
No, it's actually not really used at all and in the cases that it is used, it's to differentiate between child abusers and those who are attracted to children, but not necessarily acted on it. It's to help professionals categorize pedophiles to understand them better, help victims of abuse better, and how to prevent people from becoming pedophiles.That’s a disingenuous post at best. Also ignorant as the term minor-attracted person is used by psychological academics as a means of lessening the stigma associated with pedophilia.
It's the differentiate child abusive she's been caught from child abusers who have yet to be caught.No, it's actually not really used at all and in the cases that it is used, it's to differentiate between child abusers and those who are attracted to children,
If you want to stab people in the stomach but you try your best not to it's only a matter of time before you do.but not necessarily acted on it.
No it's to say that it's a sexuality and not a trauma response. To say that it's as legitimate as homosexuality.It's to help professionals categorize pedophiles to understand them better, help victims of abuse better, and how to prevent people from becoming pedophiles.
Gay lesbian male homosexuality is a normal aspect of human sexuality. There is no objective argument to show its abnormal and according to twin studies we can see there is clear genetic aspect to itI've asked this question of most of the bigoted transphobic/Homophobic folks here, but i never get a viable response.
Normally, they just refuse to answer.
Or, they'll answer "if you don't know i feel sorry for you", or something along those lines.
I'd like to try and understand what makes some think their sexual proclivities are less or more perverse than other folks.
I recall as a teenager, sitting around with my friends shooting the shit. We'd discuss all sorts of topics. One day, homosexuality came up. We all agreed that watching two beautiful females kissing would be pleasing. But, when visualizing two men kissing on the mouth, their grisly beards scratching against one another, the reactions became mixed.
Now, none of us were bigots as teenagers, but I wondered, what caused some kids to swing towards bigotry in adulthood, and others to lean towards acceptance and inclusion?
Google disagrees with you:Trans ideology is a socially transmitted mental disorder involving a premorbid personality disorder. Biological gender cant be changed. A man can dress and act like a woman thats called cross dressing or transvestite. Thats been going on forever. If one actually believes he can transform into a woman thats delusional thinking and must never be defined as normal. Thats an act of cruelty.
What?Here is a fact for you. The overwhelming number of priests who sexually abused the children were homosexuals. And the acts were homosexual not pedophile.
Link?Gay lesbian male homosexuality is a normal aspect of human sexuality. There is no objective argument to show its abnormal and according to twin studies we can see there is clear genetic aspect to it
Trans ideology is a socially transmitted mental disorder involving a premorbid personality disorder. Biological gender cant be changed. A man can dress and act like a woman thats called cross dressing or transvestite. Thats been going on forever. If one actually believes he can transform into a woman thats delusional thinking and must never be defined as normal. Thats an act of cruelty.
Google has no credibility I have a graduate degree in psychopathology 30 years experience and 8 years in private practice. The APA and WHO are both political. Those of us in the field know all to well this is a mental illness and enabling it is an act of cruelty. What we see in the history is sexual abuse, gay in denial, factitious disorder by proxi, autism, anxiety depression, and influence from social media. They respond to family systems therapy and psychotherapyGoogle disagrees with you:
"Major medical and psychological organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA), do not consider being transgender or having a transgender identity to be a mental disorder
. In fact, the WHO formally removed "gender identity disorder" from its diagnostic manual (ICD-11) and instead categorized "gender incongruence" under sexual health, reflecting a better understanding that it is not a mental health condition. The APA has also actively opposed efforts to characterize transgender identity as a mental disorder."
Your idea is a support of conversion therapy.Google has no credibility I have a graduate degree in psychopathology 30 years experience and 8 years in private practice. The APA and WHO are both political. Those of us in the field know all to well this is a mental illness and enabling it is an act of cruelty.
You cannot prove that claim.What we see in the history is sexual abuse, gay in denial, factitious disorder by proxi, autism, anxiety depression, and influence from social media. They respond to family systems therapy and psychotherapy
Studies have shown that most heterosexual men show the same level of stress seeing public displays of affection between two men, as they do when seeing maggots and rotting flesh.
But, researchers couldn't tell why.
"It could mean that they had an anxiety response to the male couples kissing and a disgust response to the disgusting images, but that physiologically, there was no distinction between these two emotions.”
They did conclude that individuals who are more easily disgusted are also more likely to make unfavorable moral judgments about gay people.
You may have noted, mant folks, particularly far right people, express a visceral hatred towards gays/trans that goes far beyond the anxiety noted in these studies.
Why?
Or, better yet, how did they come by this visceral hatred of gays/trans and belief that gays are perverted?
This question is directed at those why believe homosexuality is perverted.
How did they come by that belief?
Gay lesbian male homosexuality is a normal aspect of human sexuality. There is no objective argument to show its abnormal and according to twin studies we can see there is clear genetic aspect to it
Trans ideology is a socially transmitted mental disorder involving a premorbid personality disorder. Biological gender cant be changed. A man can dress and act like a woman thats called cross dressing or transvestite. Thats been going on forever. If one actually believes he can transform into a woman thats delusional thinking and must never be defined as normal. Thats an act of cruelty.