- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 76,096
- Reaction score
- 63,522
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Checkerboard Strangler said:Look, if it turns out that Mexican detention centers are treating people better than our own, will you at least admit that we need to take a serious look at the business of warehousing people for profit, something you previously said did not even exist?
(Do I HAVE to pull up your post where you said that you didn't think anyone is making a fortune off it or will you be honest and admit that you had no idea how deep this rabbit hole goes?)
Now that Mexico has agreed to do more to waylay people crossing their country for our border, someone will be looking at conditions in these Mexican detention centers.
Okay, I can see where you inaccurately paraphrase me, either for purpose of argument or accuracy, only you know that.
I never said Little Capone, did I? You know I didn't. You used that term, didn't you? I did say criminal. Illegal immigration is a crime, ergo illegal. You know that, right?
Regards,
CP
Yes, I added the hyperbole, because I felt your crude classification of a bunch of kids as criminals DESERVED it and I used that to drive home a point which you are strenuously avoiding.
There simply is NO WAY IN HELL I can take you seriously about the illegal immigration problem when you side with the people detaining them for money, with those illegals as their meal ticket to prosperity.
Why on Earth would they want LESS illegals when that would be a threat to their bottom line?
It is IMPOSSIBLE to be on the side of detention center owners AND be for restricting immigration of any kind.
It would be like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.
You don't get it, you never will get it, your whole reason for spewing phony "concern" hinges upon you not ever "getting it" and I am bored with this nonsense.
Bye now, not interested in playing this stupid game. Little kids aren't criminals.