He is telling them no such thing. He is only telling them that the media is telling them false stuff.
Sorry, but when you start making **** up like you did here, you will get the same thing I give the media...
You are dismissed.
Trump clearly said "don't believe what you see and hear". Whether he was just talking about CNN and NBC or in general, it still means that he is telling people that they are dumb and cannot discriminate themselves whether the reporting is right or not.
He is telling people, I am the only one that will tell you the truth and don't even LOOK at what others are saying. Is that what you believe too?
I don't think you actually addressed the question I asked. The question is whether you believe your own eyes and ears when hearing Trump talk or do you believe what Trump says you should believe.
As far as the question about Putin being relevant is that our intelligence community has determined that Putin wanted and worked to achieve Trump's victory and Putin confirmed that he did want Trump to win and worked in favor of it happening, meaning that the intelligence community is right and not Trump when he says "possibly, but I believe Trump when he said he did not work to make it happen.
So all you have is emotinalism and claims based on assumptions. Gotcha. You're dismissed.
Trump said yesterday "don't believe what you see or what you read"
What does this mean? That you need to be "told by Trump" what is real or not? or that you are not intelligent enough to understand what you see and read? or that the only one telling the Truth is Trump and everyone else, especially those against him, are lying?
Don't believe what you see or what you read is straight out the "1984" novel about a Dictators manual on what to do to silence your critics.
In addition and even more incredible is that the White House version of the Trump/Putin news conference has omitted the statement from Putin that he "wanted Trump to win the election". This is gone from the OFFICIAL transcript released by the White House. It is also said that "a new version" of the video of the news conference will be released but that it will be edited. Nonetheless, the Truth is that Putin did say he wanted Trump to win the election and that he worked in favor of it happening? Is editing this something you believe is the right thing to do?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/story/our-president-says-dont-believe-what-you-see-and-read/vi-AAAnvya
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/07/trump-putin-press-conference-transcript/565385/
Are we now to believe only what Trump says and disregard everything else? Is truth now to be evicted from our Democracy? Are differences of opinion and talking about the options (other than Trump's) now to be silenced like Trump talking about revoking the Security Clearances of 6 former officials that criticized him. Is this what is now called Democracy?
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-may-revoke-security-clearances-for-6-former-officials-who-have-criticized-him-2018-07-23
I don't know about you but to me this is a Democracy turning into a Dictatorship and I don't like it.
Voice your opinions on this! Republicans and Trumpians welcome to chime in.
And isn't this all so novel, Pero? Here you have a President who takes to Twitter, who is exploiting social media to get his own message out and bypassing the MSM in the most modern of ways, and a MSM that is generally more openly hostile than I can remember in my lifetime. I'm inclined to grain-of-salt them all.
There are still great journos out there, but there are too many who didn't take Journo 101, who, rather than seeing their job as reporting facts, have appointed themselves the shapers of the news. For those unfamiliar with Ezra Klein and the infamous JournoList: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JournoList
And again, social media is having a huge impact, especially on otherwise "low-information" voters. In the Insta-Info Age, it's more difficult to sort facts, especially with the earliest breaking-news reports. Smiling as I think of the old saying about how a lie can traverse the globe before the truth has the time to put its pants on.
Anyway, I find fascinating a President deliberately bypassing the MSM and very funny, although shocking, his saying aloud, "I don't take questions from CNN; they're fake news."
You mean to tell me that at some point in time he has stated that "some" of what the media has stated about him is correct? That he has agreed that he is not PERFECT and that maybe all his decisions have not been right? Has he EVER said something like that?
He is telling you "Only I know what is real and you should not pay attention to what your eyes see or what your read". View attachment 67236886
Do I need to remind everyone that most of the news is not opinion but simply replaying video of what Trump said?
This thing about Fake News is getting tiresome because 90% of what Trump is calling Fake News is simply a Trump video on what he said. That is NOT fake news. It is a President that is incompetent, making mistake after mistake, and a cabinet that is mostly (actually totally) yes men. The Fake News accusations from Trump is just his ego that will not allow him to say he was wrong, as such he has to blame someone and the only ones he can blame is the media by saying they are reporting Fake News. C'mon people, are you not intelligent enough to realize this is what is happening? Do you NOT have eyes and ears? Can you not make evaluations for yourself?
Can you let me know your opinion first so I can form one based on yours?
My opinion is clear on the thread that I wrote. Check it out by going to the first page and the first comment.
I'm sure a reality TV star shyster knows what is real and what is not. /s :lamo
Is that what you were asking?
I thought I made it perfectly clear that I typically fact-check before coming to any conclusions when I pointed out in a prior response that I PERSONALLY reviewed hours of video the MSM claimed showed Trump was a racist, sexist, etc., and found those claims to be untrue. In point of fact, as stated in posts during the campaign period, it was this false reporting that put me in Trump's camp originally.
I've seen little to no change in such reporting in the intervening time up to now.
Perhaps a review of my prior post history would show this to your satisfaction?
Yes, I can. But I also don't see the point in a discourse with somebody whose attitude is "Don't bother me with facts; my mind is made up."
I don't see "truth now to be evicted from our Democracy or any "silencing" of the media, and I also don't see "Democracy turning into a Dictatorship."
Tangible? Rhetoric?
You mean to tell me that a man should not be judged by his own words? If you believe that, then everything and anything is possible. A liar could be the most truthful person in the world. A bully can be Mother Teresa. a dictator could be a giver. a coward could be a hero..............if words mean nothing.
Do you remember the old adage about "a man is only as good as his words"? Do you not believe in that?
Ever heard of the old adage of "actions speak louder than words"? Do you not believe in that? I prefer my old adage over yours any day o the week.
Trump said yesterday "don't believe what you see or what you read"
What does this mean? That you need to be "told by Trump" what is real or not? or that you are not intelligent enough to understand what you see and read? or that the only one telling the Truth is Trump and everyone else, especially those against him, are lying?
Don't believe what you see or what you read is straight out the "1984" novel about a Dictators manual on what to do to silence your critics.
In addition and even more incredible is that the White House version of the Trump/Putin news conference has omitted the statement from Putin that he "wanted Trump to win the election". This is gone from the OFFICIAL transcript released by the White House. It is also said that "a new version" of the video of the news conference will be released but that it will be edited. Nonetheless, the Truth is that Putin did say he wanted Trump to win the election and that he worked in favor of it happening? Is editing this something you believe is the right thing to do?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/story/our-president-says-dont-believe-what-you-see-and-read/vi-AAAnvya
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/07/trump-putin-press-conference-transcript/565385/
Are we now to believe only what Trump says and disregard everything else? Is truth now to be evicted from our Democracy? Are differences of opinion and talking about the options (other than Trump's) now to be silenced like Trump talking about revoking the Security Clearances of 6 former officials that criticized him. Is this what is now called Democracy?
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-may-revoke-security-clearances-for-6-former-officials-who-have-criticized-him-2018-07-23
I don't know about you but to me this is a Democracy turning into a Dictatorship and I don't like it.
Voice your opinions on this! Republicans and Trumpians welcome to chime in.
Like I said it doesn't happen overnight. Here are the steps that can make it happen:
1. Expand your power base through nepotism and corruption.
Who do you know that has put family members in key Whitehouse positions, which was pretty much unheard of until now? And do I even have to show examples of the corruption?
2. Instigate a monopoly on the use of force to curb public protest.
We are now outlawing pubic protest and treating peaceful protesters as the enemy.
3. Curry favour by providing public goods efficiently and generously.
4. Get rid of your political enemies
5. Create and defeat a common enemy.
6. Accumulate power by manipulating the hearts and minds of your citizens.
7. Create an ideology to justify an exalted position
I can easily show you examples of where Trump has and is doing all of this but I need to get some work done today. I'm self employed. If I don't work I don't eat.
Ever heard of the old adage of "actions speak louder than words"? Do you not believe in that? I prefer my old adage over yours any day o the week.
When it comes to Trump, though, I'm guessing that he's insinuating that the reporting being done doesn't quite reflect the actual facts, and we've seen that to be true a number of times in the past couple of years.