- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
- Messages
- 69,556
- Reaction score
- 77,164
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You can't give all the new wealth of a country to just a few golden few. Capitalism dies when the incentive of the possibility to get ahead is taken away. Which it has been the case since 1981. I would like the greatest most powerful richest country in the world, to stay capitalistic and a Republic. Not caring about the fact that the golden few get it all and in no way deserve it all is selling out my country.
The question is not whether there is harmful distribution of wealth. History is just about uniform in a few respects, one of which is that the more disparity and the smaller the top class, the higher the probability of civil unrest (no matter who is right in principle and who is right in how they go about what they do about it).
The question that matters: what can be done that is not more harmful than the disparity, in the short and long term?