• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dateline Florida: Guns Win Again

A window blew out on a jet and sucked a woman out. Did we ban windows on jets? No. But if a dozen people were sucked out on a flight every few weeks, like we see kids shot dead in schools, you can bet your ass they would.

That's why your previous post was stupid.

your post is stupid because there is no benefit to having jet windows fail.
so stop the silly troll age that even you don't believe.
 
your post is stupid because there is no benefit to having jet windows fail.
so stop the silly troll age that even you don't believe.

that remark is even more stupid than your last post.
 
that remark is even more stupid than your last post.

why would we not correct a defective window

why does the government give thousands of people guns

why do you think your silly attempts to troll gun advocates does anything worthwhile
 
why would we not correct a defective window

why does the government give thousands of people guns

why do you think your silly attempts to troll gun advocates does anything worthwhile
You're not addressing my post.

Here, read it again and try to think before spewing more nonsense.


A window blew out on a jet and sucked a woman out. Did we ban windows on jets? No. But if a dozen people were sucked out on a flight every few weeks, like we see kids shot dead in schools, you can bet your ass they would.

That's why your previous post was stupid.

And, do try to keep it in context with your original stupid post.

so at what point does the number of potential deaths less important than the right of an honest citizen to own a firearm?
 
You're not addressing my post.

Here, read it again and try to think before spewing more nonsense.

you seem unable to understand

there is no good to leaving such windows unrepared

banning guns-as you frantically suggest in your trolling, will cause far more harm than leaving the current laws as they are
 
you seem unable to understand

there is no good to leaving such windows unrepared

banning guns-as you frantically suggest in your trolling, will cause far more harm than leaving the current laws as they are
Who the **** said anything about leaving the window unrepaired?


Read it again. And try to understand.
 
Who the **** said anything about leaving the window unrepaired?


Read it again. And try to understand.

there's nothing to understand-you pretend gun ownership is the same as defective windows that kill people. you troll gun owners by trying to pretend those who legally own guns are responsible for gunshot murders.
 
there's nothing to understand-you pretend gun ownership is the same as defective windows that kill people. you troll gun owners by trying to pretend those who legally own guns are responsible for gunshot murders.

Stupid "gun guy" rhetoric is just getting boring...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/westmi...ffice-shooting-live-updates-today-2018-06-14/

Last Updated Jun 15, 2018 4:28 PM EDT

WESTMINSTER, Colo. -- A shooting in a Denver parking lot Thursday that killed a boy and left his brother and mother in critical condition appears to be related to road rage, police said Friday. The shooter fled the scene after the incident around 3 p.m., and was arrested hours later in Castle Rock, reports CBS Denver.

Police have identified the suspect as 23-year-old Jeremy Webster and say he's charged with murder, assault and criminal attempt to commit a felony.
 
there's nothing to understand-you pretend gun ownership is the same as defective windows that kill people. you troll gun owners by trying to pretend those who legally own guns are responsible for gunshot murders.

The issue, a strawman which you yourself brought up, is quantity of deaths. And, only a moron would argue that if tens of thousands died each year by getting sucked out of the windows of airplanes, like they do by getting shot to death with guns, that we would not ban windows in airplanes within five ****ing minutes.
 
The issue, a strawman which you yourself brought up, is quantity of deaths. And, only a moron would argue that if tens of thousands died each year by getting sucked out of the windows of airplanes, like they do by getting shot to death with guns, that we would not ban windows in airplanes within five ****ing minutes.

your silly trolling is worthless. You don't even believe half the nonsense you post because you have contradicted many of your anti gun bait lines in other posts
 
your silly trolling is worthless. You don't even believe half the nonsense you post because you have contradicted many of your anti gun bait lines in other posts

12901457_1073450119388544_2018285718626674450_o.webp
 
your silly trolling is worthless. You don't even believe half the nonsense you post because you have contradicted many of your anti gun bait lines in other posts

So, you refuse to honestly address the issue which you yourself raised.
 
So, you refuse to honestly address the issue which you yourself raised.

there is nothing honest about those who pretend banning guns will stop crime
 
there is nothing honest about those who pretend banning guns will stop crime

Cut and run instead of addressing the issue; is that all you have?
 
Cut and run instead of addressing the issue; is that all you have?

what's the issue-you are on record saying anyone who owns a gun is guilty-by association for all the "children"killed by guns. the issue is you constantly troll and bait gun owners with unsupportably silly charges. Now what exactly do you want me to address? the dishonest claims you make about law abiding gun owners or the fact you don't believe half of the anti gun stuff you post constantly
 
The issue, a strawman which you yourself brought up, is quantity of deaths. And, only a moron would argue that if tens of thousands died each year by getting sucked out of the windows of airplanes, like they do by getting shot to death with guns, that we would not ban windows in airplanes within five ****ing minutes.

Describe how the gun banning process would occur, and how post-ban how guns would be collected, from whom and by whom.
 
what's the issue-you are on record saying anyone who owns a gun is guilty-by association for all the "children"killed by guns. the issue is you constantly troll and bait gun owners with unsupportably silly charges. Now what exactly do you want me to address? the dishonest claims you make about law abiding gun owners or the fact you don't believe half of the anti gun stuff you post constantly

You brought up the issue. Did you forget it already?
 
Describe how the gun banning process would occur, and how post-ban how guns would be collected, from whom and by whom.

A good first step would be to quit pumping out more of them
 

wow that's big of you given its not a real firearm but under the Jet view that is one of the few firearms he would allow others to own
 
A good first step would be to quit pumping out more of them

Really there are a lot of people in this country who should never own guns. I don't really have a problem with law abiding people having guns but there are a lot of morons who should never be allowed to get near one
 
there is nothing honest about those who pretend banning guns will stop crime

The most disingenuous post I've seen today.
 
Back
Top Bottom