• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

D.C. Sued over Black Lives Matter Painted on City Streets

First, “Black Lives Matter” isn’t a political message.

I’ll play your game anyways. Where would Trump paint his messages of division, exclusion, and twisted, amoral so-called patriotism? He has no authority to paint it on any public street in the United States. That would be outside the boundaries of his authority.

He can’t even do so on any military base. He could probably get away with a non-political message though. What Trump message would you like painted over the entrance to your base?
Yeah black lives matter is so non political. That’s why they spoke at the DNC convention.

And what law says the commander and chief can not put make America great on a military base street. Please quote the exact law.
 
Then they need to practice what they preach and hold the president accountable for all his crimes. But we can't mention that.

I would also like to see the republican Senate investigated for abuse of power, and violation of oaths. There were firsthand witnesses (Williams and Vindman) that they just bulldozed over as of no account. Why weren't Vindman and Williams tried for perjury, since the President was acquitted?
 
The question is still valid. Why do you at this point in time have such an unhealthy obsession with Klayman or the so-called birther movement that the Hillary Clinton camp started? It was an issue in the 2008 and 2012 elections. It has nothing to do with the 2016 or 2020 election and this thread is about BLM and DC painting their slogan on a street. If you want to start a thread about your issues with Klayman and the birther movement, have at it.

Why do I have an unhealthy obsession with Klayman? I dunno man. When did you stop beating your wife? Sheesh.
 
How much does street ad space cost?
 
You use the term "lies so broadly that I doubt you actually understand what it means. If you disagree with something I post, the adult way of discussing it is to attempt to disprove it, not just shout "lies" over anything you disagree with.

If you said trump's middle initial was A, I'd say you made an error. When you put words in my mouth that I said all black people killed by police were murdered to try to win an argument with a straw man, I call it a lie. Now you try to smear again.
 
The south today is nothing like the south of the segregation or slavery era.

The guy who claims the Democrats used to have the racist south in the distant past proves they're the party of the KKK today, doesn't like change not being recognized. The dishonesty in your posts means I am not planning to read your posts again.
 
Where in the US Constitution is the quote you reproduced?
 
It’s still not establishing or prohibiting a religion. But keep trying.

It actually is. When a government promotes one religion, it establishes it as the religion of choice.
 
It actually is. When a government promotes one religion, it establishes it as the religion of choice.

But yet some how having a Christmas tree is not. Or did you not notice how governments at pretty much all levels not only have Christmas trees but a whole lot of Christmas decorations.

Seems you are not quite as right as you think you are.

At the end of the day it is only to obvious that you only support the government doing this because it's a message you believe in. If it was something else you would be crying how unconstitutional it was. It’s silly you can’t see how obvious that is.
 
It actually is. When a government promotes one religion, it establishes it as the religion of choice.

But yet some how having a Christmas tree is not. Or did you not notice how governments at pretty much all levels not only have Christmas trees but a whole lot of Christmas decorations.

Seems you are not quite as right as you think you are.

At the end of the day it is only to obvious that you only support the government doing this because it's a message you believe in. If it was something else you would be crying how unconstitutional it was. It’s silly you can’t see how obvious that is.
 
But yet some how having a Christmas tree is not. Or did you not notice how governments at pretty much all levels not only have Christmas trees but a whole lot of Christmas decorations.

Seems you are not quite as right as you think you are.

At the end of the day it is only to obvious that you only support the government doing this because it's a message you believe in. If it was something else you would be crying how unconstitutional it was. It’s silly you can’t see how obvious that is.

Decorations and symbols brought in by employees are protected if they are seen as mostly secular in nature (Christmas trees and similar decorations). If the actual government provides (sponsors) them, that becomes the issue.
 
Yeah black lives matter is so non political. That’s why they spoke at the DNC convention.
Get it straight, I said Black Lives Matter isn’t a political message. Black Live Matter is a social movement, not a political one. And members speaking in support of that movement at the DNC convention does not change that.

Both major parties invite speakers representing a variety causes. One of the speakers at the 2016 RNC conference was Peter Thiel, PayPal co-founder, who spoke about technology, the economy, and gay rights.

And what law says the commander and chief
Not “commander and chief”, Commander-in-Chief. As a military member, you don’t have any excuse for not knowing this.

And what law says the commander and chief can not put make America great on a military base street. Please quote the exact law.
Here ya go!
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/134410p.pdf
https://osc.gov/Documents/Outreach ...tch Act and Most Federal Employees Poster.pdf
Military Political Activity Restrictions | Military.com
Again, you really have no excuse for not already knowing this.
 
Let's see both comey and McCabe lied to the FBI commented several constitutional rights violations. obama did as well so did biden. COmey and McCabe both leaked classified data to the press without authorization. Clinton was grossly negligent in the handling of classified information. Stzok well he has broke so many laws it is hard to tell where to start. not that you care.

It's not that I don't care, it's I'm not buying into the tin foil 'deep state' crap. I have to ask, since Barr is tRump's bitch where are the indictments??? Back last nov Gene Rossi claimed there is enough evidence to draft two charges against Former two term Obama.... anyone still holding their breath over that one??? How about DeGenova claiming two dem congressmen are about to be indicted, many on the rabid right cheered.... ahhh what happened???

Now rabid right bloggers have laundry lists of 'charges' too many to list but everyone but Mrs. Obama is on the list with multiple charges per person.... why is Barr not going forward????

It is amazing how the rabid right sees indictments behind everyone they hate, but for some reason think tRump is 'perfect'.... :peace
 
It's not that I don't care, it's I'm not buying into the tin foil 'deep state' crap.

thanks for proving the fact that you don't care.
there is no deep state myth when it happened and there is documentation to support it.

facts do not care about your feelings.
once again leftism requires low information people to continue thriving.
 
Yeah black lives matter is so non political. That’s why they spoke at the DNC convention. And what law says the commander and chief can not put make America great on a military base street. Please quote the exact law.

Well BLM shouldn't have been, nor gay rights, a woman's rights to her own body, or sensible immigration laws. The extreme right wing of the GOP has pandered to the scared white Americans who fear being a minority. The shoe being put on their foot doesn't seem to appeal to them. Who'da thunk... :roll:

The GOP wants to return to the 50's on cultural issues. Thinks somehow bringing back major industries will reset society. The Dems know longing for the good ol' days is futile. One the one hand the rabid right claims we should adapt to climate change and not try to stop it, but seems completely against cultural climate change and want to stand against the winds of change... :confused:

You present yourself as a military protocol expert- has ANY President labeled anything with a political campaign slogan??? :peace
 
thanks for proving the fact that you don't care. there is no deep state myth when it happened and there is documentation to support it. facts do not care about your feelings. once again leftism requires low information people to continue thriving.

You need to calm down a bit, attacking me doesn't make your opinion a fact. If there were enough facts to back up Rossi or DeGenova there would be indictments by now. If there were enough facts to back up the laundry list of 'facts' rabid right wing bloggers claim as truth Barr would have already indicted, especially after the Impeachment. tRump is not one to let an attack go unanswered (and with a hailstorm)

I'll agree with one thing- facts don't care about your feelings. Going on 4 years of tRumpism and no indictments. Now THAT'S a fact even the 'alternate facts' world should be able to understand...

Or maybe I'm given them too much credit... :peace
 
You need to calm down a bit, attacking me doesn't make your opinion a fact. If there were enough facts to back up Rossi or DeGenova there would be indictments by now. If there were enough facts to back up the laundry list of 'facts' rabid right wing bloggers claim as truth Barr would have already indicted, especially after the Impeachment. tRump is not one to let an attack go unanswered (and with a hailstorm)

I'll agree with one thing- facts don't care about your feelings. Going on 4 years of tRumpism and no indictments. Now THAT'S a fact even the 'alternate facts' world should be able to understand...

Or maybe I'm given them too much credit... :peace

I am not attacking you. YOu simply proved my point that is all i needed for you to admit.
 
I am not attacking you. YOu simply proved my point that is all i needed for you to admit.

Ah, now I get your 'alternate facts' POV. You see things that aren't there. Supposed dozens of crimes committed and yet tRump's lapdog hasn't indicted ANYONE and we all know tRump was on the warpath after he was impeached. You see some admission when none was given.

But you prove my point- lie after lie was told about dems and indictments and there are still no indictments... :peace
 
Ah, now I get your 'alternate facts' POV. You see things that aren't there. Supposed dozens of crimes committed and yet tRump's lapdog hasn't indicted ANYONE and we all know tRump was on the warpath after he was impeached. You see some admission when none was given.

But you prove my point- lie after lie was told about dems and indictments and there are still no indictments... :peace

you have your alternative facts whatever those are i don't know.
I simply deal in facts themselves.

you said yourself you don't care you have no argument.
you don't want to deal in facts then well that is your choice not mine.

They are still doing the investigations.
that is why there haven't been any indictments.

No lie was told only facts.
they are out there for everyone to see.

you can live in alternate facts because leftist can't deal with actual facts.
 
Here's I took some photos of the event, and I accept your apology. They actually blocked the freeway entrance for several minutes so we all put our cars and parked and waved while they waved back. So great to live in a country where people from all walks of life want to effect positive changes.

View attachment 67286519

The rest of your post are is just the paranoid, bigoted rantings a frightened person not comfortable with people of color getting "uppity".

Nice try, however just because you posted a picture does not prove that you either took the picture or were even in the vicinity. No apology is warranted, therefore none is given.
 
Nice try, however just because you posted a picture does not prove that you either took the picture or were even in the vicinity. No apology is warranted, therefore none is given.

Well, I'll do my best to go about my day....
 
If you said trump's middle initial was A, I'd say you made an error. When you put words in my mouth that I said all black people killed by police were murdered to try to win an argument with a straw man, I call it a lie. Now you try to smear again.

Actually you are attempting to put words in my mouth. I never claimed that you said all black people killed by police were murdered. However you do give the impression with your posting that you think there is a systemic problem of blacks killed by way of police brutality. Of all of the publicized cases of blacks killed in confrontations with police, there is only one that is a clear case of murder. That would be George Floyd. All of the other cases were determined to be justified killings. And once again the confrontation that Black Lives Matter started all of the protesting and looting over was the Michael Brown case in Fergeson, Missouri. And that was absolutely determined to be a justified killing. When you reach into a cops squad car and attempt to wrestle a cop's gun from him, it will not likely end well for you. The "hands up, don't shoot" narrative that the left pushed was a flat out lie. I am only asking you for intellectual honesty.
 
The guy who claims the Democrats used to have the racist south in the distant past proves they're the party of the KKK today, doesn't like change not being recognized. The dishonesty in your posts means I am not planning to read your posts again.

You are quite confused and just flat making it up as you go along. I have not claimed that the democrats racist past and history with the KKK makes them the party of the KKK today. I did state that the democrats absolutely welcomed Democrat Senator Robert "KKK Byrd and other democrats back into the party from the dixiecrat fold. And two of today's most prominent democrats, one of which(Hillary) was defeated by Trump and the other appears to be your party's nominee for president in 2020(Joe Biden), both at one point claimed Byrd as a friend and mentor. I will state that the vast majority of racism that exists today in in the democrats party fold. And I can give examples.
 
Back
Top Bottom