Cultists are relying on the corruption of Republican senators

[Manc Skipper]

The truth is wholly evident to everyone except manic Trump hating liberals.

Your name is ironic, isn't it?

 

[Manc Skipper]

Right, like he was hiding truth from Mueller right? Mueller and his Democrat investigators scoured the planet for two years, were given 1.4 million pages of documents by Trump, conducted over 500 interviews in 13 countries and still couldn't get the goods. So, how exactly could Trump be hiding anything? There simply comes a point when sane people must realize that there is nothing to be found. But Democrats are far from sane when it comes to Trump.

Mueller reported why. Much of the electronic communication was withheld or destroyed

 

[Divine_Wind]

Trump exercised executive privilege which he is legally entitled to do. But, like I said, nobody is keeping Bolton from testifying. The bottom line is that the Dems, for all their theatrics and lying, have nothing and have seriously shot themselves in the foot. Next year should be fun.

Yes, he did...just like Nixon did.....and for similar reasons: to hide the truth. Whether or not the use of Executive privilege to hide evidence or for a cover-up is legal remains to be seen. I doubt it is just like there is no such thing as attorney-client privilege when both are committing a crime.

 

[veritas1]

Yes, he did...just like Nixon did.....and for similar reasons: to hide the truth. Whether or not the use of Executive privilege to hide evidence or for a cover-up is legal remains to be seen. I doubt it is just like there is no such thing as attorney-client privilege when both are committing a crime.

The WB complaint was about the Zelensky phone call. Trump called their bluff and released the transcript. Everyone can see that there's no crime there whatever. If there were, then Trump would have withheld it according to you. It's amazing that, for all the Dems snooping around for three years, the "real" evidence is always somewhere else. How convenient.

 

[Divine_Wind]

Your name is ironic, isn't it?

Much like Trump’s comments that he’s a “stable genius” or that he and his family have superior genes even though those “superior genes” required tens of thousands of dollars worth of plastic surgery and hair care products to look superior.

 

[Divine_Wind]

The WB complaint was about the Zelensky phone call. Trump called their bluff and released the transcript. Everyone can see that there's no crime there whatever. If there were, then Trump would have withheld it according to you. It's amazing that, for all the Dems snooping around for three years, the "real" evidence is always somewhere else. How convenient.

You might try more truth and less BS next time. That was an edited transcript of a single phone call. The WB complaint was based on overhearing conversations about Trump’s efforts and he bounced them up the COC. Further investigation revealed actual witnesses to the effort but the key witnesses have been ordered to disobey Congress and refuse to testify. Spin it all you like, but those are, indeed, the facts.

 

[veritas1]

You might try more truth and less BS next time. That was an edited transcript of a single phone call. The WB complaint was based on overhearing conversations about Trump’s efforts and he bounced them up the COC. Further investigation revealed actual witnesses to the effort but the key witnesses have been ordered to disobey Congress and refuse to testify. Spin it all you like, but those are, indeed, the facts.

You cling to that. Cling to it right up to next November.

 

[Divine_Wind]

You cling to that. Cling to it right up to next November.

Truth is always worth clinging to, not lies, BS and covering up criminal activity. You should know better.

 

[Craig234]

Will they be right???

Very likely. It's a good bet. Republicans have painted themselves into a corner with trump. It'd be as if the Democratic Party all loved Hillary and insisted on nominating her again, while the country did not want her.

 

[jnug]

The WB complaint was about the Zelensky phone call. Trump called their bluff and released the transcript. Everyone can see that there's no crime there whatever. If there were, then Trump would have withheld it according to you. It's amazing that, for all the Dems snooping around for three years, the "real" evidence is always somewhere else. How convenient.

You don't need a Federal Code crime for Impeachment. In fact given the immense power of the Presidency, dependence on this inane argument about the existence of a Federal Code crime or proof of one in relation to Impeachment is juvenile AT BEST. Abuse of Office in any form from an office as powerful as Chief Executive of the United States is worthy of a serious Impeachment inquiry.

 

[GDViking]

You don't need a Federal Code crime for Impeachment. In fact given the immense power of the Presidency, dependence on this inane argument about the existence of a Federal Code crime or proof of one in relation to Impeachment is juvenile AT BEST. Abuse of Office in any form from an office as powerful as Chief Executive of the United States is worthy of a serious Impeachment inquiry.

Yes however many on here do not seem to comprehend that.

Trump could be Impeached for something as simple as activities unbecoming a president.

Lying for going on 4,000 times since taken the oath he ignores daily for example...

 

[veritas1]

You don't need a Federal Code crime for Impeachment. In fact given the immense power of the Presidency, dependence on this inane argument about the existence of a Federal Code crime or proof of one in relation to Impeachment is juvenile AT BEST. Abuse of Office in any form from an office as powerful as Chief Executive of the United States is worthy of a serious Impeachment inquiry.

Baloney. The founders were clear about high crimes and misdemeanors. There hasn't even been a low crime here. This is all about politics and Dems' psychotic hatred of Trump. Clinton committed 11 felonies according to the Starr Report. Did you support his removal?

 

[Hypothetical]

It's 100% partisan.

The republicans will impeach the next democrat president.

Payback.

All you need is a vote in the house and another in the senate. The crime doesn't have to be real.

hell I already presume the next dem president is into racketeering... when can we start the hearings?

i can get WB status can't I ?

 

[Hypothetical]

If they had nothing to add, then why did Trump order them to disobey the subpoenas?

because the Executive has that right and doe snot want to participate in the witchhunt. IF Dems are really that worried about it, take it to the SCOTUS.

 

[Hypothetical]

Yes however many on here do not seem to comprehend that.

Trump could be Impeached for something as simple as activities unbecoming a president.

Lying for going on 4,000 times since taken the oath he ignores daily for example...

you're ABSOLUTELY Right, you can impeach based on that crap...

don't expect to have the support of the rest of the people though, and you may lose some seats in politics in a lot of places next time there's a vote

 

[Divine_Wind]

because the Executive has that right and doe snot want to participate in the witchhunt. IF Dems are really that worried about it, take it to the SCOTUS.

Strawman Argument: no one says Trump doesn't have Executive Privilege. I'm saying Trump could prove this is a "hoax" or "witchhunt" by having the key people testify to the Truth. Want to stop a "witchhunt"? Reveal the truth, don't hide the witches.

 

[CaughtInThe]

They will definitely be right. If Republican senators do the correct and honorable thing they open themselves up to assassination. They will not put their families at risk.