• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

couldn't happen to a more deserving organization

Tanngrisnir said:
It's always a good thing when corrupt organizations are taken down, esp. by their own doing.

I'm not surprised you have to pretend otherwise.
Click to expand...

Another peach.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Your two-fisted support of corruption and criminality duly noted and utterly unsurprising.
Click to expand...

I suspect the NRA bashing is rooted in something other than the claims of corruption
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Your two-fisted support of corruption and criminality duly noted and utterly unsurprising.
Click to expand...

I support the workers. You know...the people you DON'T care about.
 
Have you guys ever noticed that the NRA says virtually nothing about women who get gunned down in their own homes by their own spouses?

They seem to comment on pretty much everything except for that. If a bunch of kindergartners get gunned down they will say that more armed security guards are the answer. Concert goers get gunned down and more guns are the answer.

They just can't quite come out and say that women should arm themselves against a potential attack from their spouse even though it happens all the time.

A bridge too far I guess.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
The workers who prop up a criminal enterprise. Not even remotely surprised that you'd try and rationalize that away.
Click to expand...

Is the Democratic Party a criminal enterprise?
 
CaughtInThe said:
Have you guys ever noticed that the NRA says virtually nothing about women who get gunned down in their own homes by their own spouses?

They seem to comment on pretty much everything except for that. If a bunch of kindergartners get gunned down they will say that more armed security guards are the answer. Concert goers get gunned down and more guns are the answer.

They just can't quite come out and say that women should arm themselves against a potential attack from their spouse even though it happens all the time.

A bridge too far I guess.
Click to expand...

actually the NRA has been in the forefront of telling women they should be armed and trained. One of the most effective ads against Hillary clinton was an NRA ad featuring a single woman. It is gun banners who want these women to be defenseless


 
Tanngrisnir said:
The cult of gun masturbators and fetishists simply don't care that they're been taken for a ride as easy marks.

It's what they want. They are, after all, bottoms.
Click to expand...

How can anyone take seriously an argument that uses such silly terms. But it does show what motivates the anti gunners-and that is certainly not any hatred of actual criminals.
 
TurtleDude said:
actually the NRA has been in the forefront of telling women they should be armed and trained. One of the most effective ads against Hillary clinton was an NRA ad featuring a single woman. It is gun banners who want these women to be defenseless


Click to expand...


This is what it looks like when a poster tries to address a post but can't so suddenly changes the subject.
 
CaughtInThe said:
This is what it looks like when a poster tries to address a post but can't so suddenly changes the subject.
Click to expand...

Actually the subject isn't about what you started to raise in your first post. And I proved your claim was dishonest. The NRA has been featuring women in their sales pitches for at least a decade. The NRA and its members understand that women are the most vulnerable to violent criminal attack and usually the police are too late to stop a violent assault
 
TurtleDude said:
I suspect the NRA bashing is rooted in something other than the claims of corruption
Click to expand...

Probably rooted in the NRA's opposition to most the anti-2nd amendment laws democrats want to pass.
 
TurtleDude said:
actually the NRA has been in the forefront of telling women they should be armed and trained. One of the most effective ads against Hillary clinton was an NRA ad featuring a single woman. It is gun banners who want these women to be defenseless


Click to expand...
People see what they want to see...always.



People like Dana Loesch have long spoke on the importance of gun ownership as a womans ultimate right to self defense...to the importance of defending yourself when law enforcement is 10-20 minutes away and the DV perpetrator realizes that restraining order really is nothing more than a piece of paper. The NRA has ALWAYS stood as a defender of women and minority gun owner rights. Still do. The NRA has ALWAYS stood as the premier organization to teach gun safety and monitor gun ranges...always has...still is. But the NRA has also stood against government attempts to ban guns. And at the end of the day...THAT one fact is why the mindless idiot left hates them so much.
 
TurtleDude said:
Actually the subject isn't about what you started to raise in your first post. And I proved your claim was dishonest. The NRA has been featuring women in their sales pitches for at least a decade. The NRA and its members understand that women are the most vulnerable to violent criminal attack and usually the police are too late to stop a violent assault
Click to expand...

this is what it looks like when you double down after subtly changing the subject.

really slick.
 
justabubba said:
we haven't even begun monitoring for those with mental issues
even sell to those on the terrorism watch list
failing to implement sound gun controls is for the stupid among us
Click to expand...

Dude, you're a riot. Again, it all revolves around control by those in power. Failing to realize that is for the stupid among us.
 
TurtleDude said:
It appears the problem is this. Gun banners only pretend to say the problem is criminals with guns. Their real problem is lawful gun owners and the way we vote. That is the only thing that makes sense-the laws they want are designed to whittle away at lawful gun ownership
Click to expand...

Would it be better if the private ownership of all guns were banned* (following a repeal of the 2nd amendment) ?



For the benefit of RF; the national executive would/could make exceptions based on make/model# like listing all known muzzle loaders and single action rifles.
I've said this before and everyone understands, but he likes to nit pick and make pedantic points.
 
Rich2018 said:
Would it be better if the private ownership of all guns were banned* (following a repeal of the 2nd amendment) ?



For the benefit of RF; the national executive would/could make exceptions based on make/model# like listing all known muzzle loaders and single action rifles.
I've said this before and everyone understands, but he likes to nit pick and make pedantic points.
Click to expand...

Another call out post referencing an argument in a different thread, and once again with no linked quote. Imagine that.


You called for exempting shotguns that hold less than 3 rounds, rifles other than semi-auto, and muzzleloaders in general.

Then you said exemptions must be on a make/model basis.

You now claim that what squares this inconsistency in your position is that they would list "all known muzzle loaders and single action rifles."

The muzzleloader portion would be quite an exhaustive list.

I suppose the shotguns are by the wayside.

But what the hell is a "single action rifle"?
 
Rich2018 said:
The only good anti-2nd amendment law would be an amendment repealing it
Click to expand...

I am sure all anti-2nd amendment trash agree with you. So now they have to settle for back door attempts to undermine the 2nd amendment that will eventually get overturned by the supreme court.
 
jamesrage said:
I am sure all anti-2nd amendment trash agree with you....
Click to expand...

And naturally you're saying all the pro 2nd amendment trash would disagree


So now they have to settle for back door attempts to undermine the 2nd amendment that will eventually get overturned by the supreme court.
Click to expand...


No, the 2nd amendment need to be repealed with a subsequent amendment

That way the pro-2nd amendment trash won't have a case to take to the Supreme Court

Then we can pass a law to ban all guns and the pro 2nd amendment trash will have to hand in their guns or have them seized.
 
Rich2018 said:
Then we can pass a law to ban all guns and the pro 2nd amendment trash will have to hand in their guns or have them seized.
Click to expand...

Wow. A certain historical figure that was prone to extending his right arm would surely be proud of your sentiment.
 
Artymoon said:
Wow. A certain historical figure that was prone to extending his right arm would surely be proud of your sentiment.
Click to expand...

Because only Nazis ban guns LOL

So the UK is a fascist state in your eyes too ?


Because even though Britain, for a time, stood against Nazi Germany alone and saw its capital city heavily bombed....it is a Nazi state because it doesn't allow its people to buy most kind of guns to shoot each other with.

If the British people had any kind of freedom, they'd vote to be allowed to have free access to guns....

Cue your next stupid comment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom