What thing?
AS A CONSENSUAL SAFE-SEX RELATIONSHIP.
Who got raped?
Which is where the man can become very guilty of Stupidity
Anyone can be guilty of stupidity, but no stupid person can be sentenced to involuntary servitude according to the law. Due process will not allow it to happen legally at any point, or in any shape or form. Forced fatherhood is illegal, for example.
by not ensuring the consesual relationship is safe-sex only.
What do you mean by safe?
This quantity is more or less equivalent to itself, near zero intelligence, as are you. It is redundant and unnecessary to include an operator of this nature in this debate, just as it would be redundant to cube stupidity.
On the one hand (history), you have it backward
Incorrect.
since many employers have discriminated against hiring women because of something like, "you will get pregnant and leave the company and our training-investment in you will have been wasted".
Irrelevant. Employers telling women to take a hike does not justify forcing men to work. They are two sides of the same coin.
ALSO,
there are folks out there who specifically claim that marriage is just another form of prostitution, which means that the woman in the consensual sexual realtionship is most certainly working!
Here's a tip: before linking a website from a google search, click on the link and copy the link from the website instead of copying the link from the search. That way I can see what the website is before I click on one of your spam links. Maybe then I would actually check to see if your sources are legitimate, instead of assuming that they are garbage like the ones you previously shared, or else completely irrelevant and pointless.
Incorrect, and I reiterate that the law discriminates against men by giving women more choices than men, beyond what is necessary for their health and well being.
, as just explained above.
The explanation is incorrect.
This is still wrong.
Men can choose to starve to death, after all.
Men need not starve themselves to death, they can simply will themselves to death. There is no parallel here between a financially abusive law and suicide, because the law gives women a real choice and men a choice between prison and slavery. Prison and slavery are more or less identical, because inmates can be forced to work. Thus it is a choice between two identical options, and therefore not a choice.
They can choose to become beggars/panhandlers.
So can a pregnant woman who can't afford to feed her child when it is born. That doesn't make it the right thing to do.
Sometimes, depending on their family connections, they can choose to mooch off others.
So can a pregnant woman, or a mother.
They can even choose to run into a burning building to save someone, and die heroically.
None of these terrible actions are exclusively limited to the male sex. Your argument is pointless, because it simply describes actions which end badly. These have nothing to do with the discussion and it is very stupid.
APPARENTLY YOU HAVEN'T STUDIED IT ENOUGH.
That statement is objectively false, rhetorically pointless and sociopolitically stunted.
Maybe you should look up why, when slavers tried to enslave Native Americans, it didn't last.
Maybe you should explain how this related to the transatlantic slave trade, or abortion in the context of this discussion, or maybe you are going off topic because you don't have the mental capacity to reason with other people.
(cont.)
