- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
- Messages
- 5,623
- Reaction score
- 605
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
[part 2 of 2, in reply to Msg #498]
FINAL NOTE: Native Americans were more willing to die than to do forced labor as slaves. The effort put in to capturing them, by slavers, was not profitable. So the slavers stopped.
EITHER WAY COUNTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO WORK. You blathered the Stupid Lie that men didn't have any alternatives to work, remember?Men need not starve themselves to death, they can simply will themselves to death.
AFTER PREGNANCY BEGINS, YES.... the law gives women a real choice
BEFORE PREGNANCY BEGINS, YES. There is no major problem there, simply because both have choices available. Consider an analogy: It is probable that certain choices could lead to testicular cancer. If both a man and a woman make those particular choices, only the man can get testicular cancer. The man now has an additional choice that the woman doesn't --he can choose to have the cancer terminated. This is precisely equivalent to why only the woman has the choice with respect to terminating a pregnancy. I'm quite aware that that analogy does not automatically include an equivalent of the stupid actions of a man helping to initiate a pregnancy, but such is not out of the question. If the woman encouraged the man to do the actions that led to the cancer, the man might be able to sue the woman for promoting endangerment, or some such legalese.and men a choice
CONSEQUENCES OF STUPID ACTIONS. As explained above.between prison and slavery.
ALL THROUGH NATURE, OFFSPRING OF SUCH PARENTS TEND TO DIE. Human culture has put rules in place, associated with the granting of right-to-life of newborn humans, to reduce the chance of such death happening. And everyone knows the baby would not exist if some man had acted differently, before the pregnancy began. I reiterate that all your blathering has the goal of making others pay for the stupidity of that man. Not Going To Happen!So can a pregnant woman who can't afford to feed her child when it is born. That doesn't make it the right thing to do.
NO, YOUR INTERPRETATION IS POINTLESS. My argument merely consisted of proving something you wrote was Stupidly False, that a man has no alternatives to work.Your argument is pointless,
IT WAS A LOGICAL CONCLUSION, from observing the nonsense you continue to blather, despite my efforts at educating you. Therefore I repeat: "Apparently you haven't studied it enough".That statement is objectively false, rhetorically pointless and sociopolitically stunted.
FINAL NOTE: Native Americans were more willing to die than to do forced labor as slaves. The effort put in to capturing them, by slavers, was not profitable. So the slavers stopped.