• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Just Torpedoed The MeToo Movement

The only people who think this statement torpedoes the movement are people who want that movement to be torpedoed.
 
She is SO stupid that even the WaPo and NYT can't give it a good spin. All they can do is pretend she doesn't exist.
 
VanceMack said:
I have long said that Monica Lewinsky was the best thing that ever happened to Bill Clinton. The only connection he had with her was that she gave him blow Jobs and he used her ***** to soak his cigars in. By his admission he used her and literally offered her NOTHING. Meanwhile, any time the impeachment of Bill Clinton comes up people talk about Monica Lewinsky, when the reality is that it literally had very little to do with Monica Lewinsky. Bill Clinton was impeached for sexually harassing Paula Jones...a campaign staff worker. She alleged that he and he eventually copped to jerking off in front of her and asking her to kiss his dick. During the civil trial deposition under oath, Clinton lied about affairs with Lewinsky and Flowers. He is on tape suborning perjury as he attempted to get Flowers to lie under oath. During the investigation several allegations of sexual assault and even rape were revealed. But Clinton’s defenders always default to Lewinsky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

VERY astute comment. Thank you. :applaud
 
Cardinal said:
Please demonstrate that Hillary Clinton is or ever was the spokesperson for the metoo movement.
Click to expand...

She was never the spokesman for the group. She did claim that her lose helped created or speed up the movement. Because of her self proclaimed closeness to the group it makes her statement laughable
 
noonereal said:
wrong again

i would not support Kav under any circumstance.

Kavy quit clearly scared the hell out of Ford but I do not think her interpretations of his actions were the same as his intent. He was simply drunk and being a jerk, taking it a bit too far without ever realizing it.

I do not think this action from so long ago was disqualifying.

I do think that his behavior in front of the senate committee was disqualifying and had I supported him I would no long have after his behavior.

I also think that very few people read this situation accurately and that it was important to hear Ford.
Click to expand...

So, you're saying that it is alright to do a political hit job on someone for purely partisan reasons but if he gets pissed off about being falsely accused, then he is then disqualified.
 
Cardinal said:
Please demonstrate that Hillary Clinton is or ever was the spokesperson for the metoo movement.
Click to expand...

Can we say broken record? Why don't you just lick your wounds, leave with your tail between your legs, and be more ready and prepared for your next ass kicking? Meanwhile, your total hypocrisy noted.
 
RileyCoyote said:
Hillary probably knows of a couple dozen people who have committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head, twice. I am sure she does much worse than the woman you refer to, but we are just not aware of her colossal sins.
Click to expand...

hillary arkancide.jpg
 
Moderate Right said:
Can we say broken record? Why don't you just lick your wounds, leave with your tail between your legs, and be more ready and prepared for your next ass kicking? Meanwhile, your total hypocrisy noted.
Click to expand...

One more time, from the top: Please demonstrate that Hillary Clinton is or ever was the spokesperson for the metoo movement.
 
We can always count on good old Hillary..........the gift that just keeps on giving.
 
noonereal said:
You think two consenting adults is not acceptable to have sex?
Click to expand...

Hitlary: 'Mein husband can have as many women as he likes as long as those women don't cause trouble for me. If those women cannot keep quiet then they may have to be put down. Heil Hitlarry.
 
Moderate Right said:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hillary-clinton-cbs-sunday-bill-175651931.html


Hillary just pardoned not only her husband but Harvey Weinstein and the rest of Hollywood. It's apparently OK to use your position to influence your subordinates to have sex with you.
Click to expand...

The utter silence across all these supposedly pro-women's groups is also telling. What that tells me is all those groups aren't necessarily pro-women, but pro-Democrat. Pro-Democrat trying to attract the woman's vote just like any other political organization.

What I also noticed was all those senators who were in the senate during Bill Clinton's term, that defended him to the max and discredit, defamed and tried to destroy those women who came out against Bill, used basically the same allegation against Kavanaugh that were brought against Bill. Of course those Republicans who went after Bill, were defending Kavanaugh. This brings on the realization that neither party cares about women, sexual allegations, or the like. Only how to use allegations, true or false against the other party.

Neither party has any moral standards, only those standards that will further their political agenda and attract votes.
 
Moderate Right said:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hillary-clinton-cbs-sunday-bill-175651931.html


Hillary just pardoned not only her husband but Harvey Weinstein and the rest of Hollywood. It's apparently OK to use your position to influence your subordinates to have sex with you.
Click to expand...
If Lewinski claimed that she was forced then I would agree. However I have never heard her claim so... hence this whole thread is idiotic and the right attacking Clinton and Metoo are their usual stupid.

Sendt fra min SM-N9005 med Tapatalk
 
Perotista said:
The utter silence across all these supposedly pro-women's groups is also telling. What that tells me is all those groups aren't necessarily pro-women, but pro-Democrat. Pro-Democrat trying to attract the woman's vote just like any other political organization.

What I also noticed was all those senators who were in the senate during Bill Clinton's term, that defended him to the max and discredit, defamed and tried to destroy those women who came out against Bill, used basically the same allegation against Kavanaugh that were brought against Bill. Of course those Republicans who went after Bill, were defending Kavanaugh. This brings on the realization that neither party cares about women, sexual allegations, or the like. Only how to use allegations, true or false against the other party.

Neither party has any moral standards, only those standards that will further their political agenda and attract votes.
Click to expand...

The MeToo movement favors the Democrats, in my opinion. As you noted, most of these pro-women's groups are Democratic and they have a Democratic agenda. They get very loud mouthed when it comes to the other side, but can be very silent when it comes to their side. The MeToo movement can also be used to further an agenda by leveling false charges against someone to snuff them out, so to speak. It is very much the end justifies the means. It isn't a far fetched scenario at all that the left were so panicked that Kavanaugh might overturn RvW that people came out of the woodwork with totally false charges to destroy him and delay the confirmation of a judge until after the midterms. If this scenario is correct, Ford didn't have much to lose because even if she lied under oath, with a he said she said situation, no one would ever be able to prove that she lied for political gain and thus no lawsuits for criminal charges could ever be filed against her. Any false charges leveled against anyone actually hurts the legitimacy of the MeToo movement in the long run. Of course the other side isn't squeaky clean either when it comes to tricks.
 
Moderate Right said:
The MeToo movement favors the Democrats, in my opinion. As you noted, most of these pro-women's groups are Democratic and they have a Democratic agenda. They get very loud mouthed when it comes to the other side, but can be very silent when it comes to their side. The MeToo movement can also be used to further an agenda by leveling false charges against someone to snuff them out, so to speak. It is very much the end justifies the means. It isn't a far fetched scenario at all that the left were so panicked that Kavanaugh might overturn RvW that people came out of the woodwork with totally false charges to destroy him and delay the confirmation of a judge until after the midterms. If this scenario is correct, Ford didn't have much to lose because even if she lied under oath, with a he said she said situation, no one would ever be able to prove that she lied for political gain and thus no lawsuits for criminal charges could ever be filed against her. Any false charges leveled against anyone actually hurts the legitimacy of the MeToo movement in the long run. Of course the other side isn't squeaky clean either when it comes to tricks.
Click to expand...

Exactly. There are many organizations that just represent the Democratic Party that tries to portray that they represent everyone and everybody which isn't so. The silence of these organizations speaks volumes as to their agenda and whom exactly they represent. Democratic Party Women, not independent or Republican women.
 
Moderate Right said:
So, you're saying that it is alright to do a political hit job on someone for purely partisan reasons but if he gets pissed off about being falsely accused, then he is then disqualified.
Click to expand...

i didn't see Hillary melt down abd she got much worse for longer.

12hours one day of complete bullish.

The guy is temperamentally unsuited.
 
noonereal said:
i didn't see Hillary melt down abd she got much worse for longer.

12hours one day of complete bullish.

The guy is temperamentally unsuited.
Click to expand...

We had days and weeks of the left being tempermental and bullish towards Kavanaugh. They were totally outrageous with some saying Kavanaugh was evil and would responsible for millions of deaths and that he was a rapist and a drunk and everything else. Personally, I think Kavanaugh should have slugged those people in the face.
 
Yes, Sandusky's wife, Cosby's wife and Trump's wife. They all look the other way at least as much as she has for worse offenses. Hillary is just too arrogant to admit that she didn't marry well. She's not the only one to have that problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom