- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is what I see:
http://www.bea.gov/iTable/download....3477A02E303D5B52DC780C0BFEF8E8E73D07D9F7FE1E5
Code:Table 3.2. Federal Government Current Receipts and Expenditures [Billions of dollars] Seasonally adjusted at annual rates Bureau of Economic Analysis Last Revised on: September 27, 2012 - Next Release Date October 26, 2012
ETACode:Line * 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II 1 Current receipts 2101.9 2087 1894.9 1997.3 1860 1858.3 1855.9 1863.1 1886.3 1902.8 1827.4 1923.9 1944.4 1989 2044.2 2078.3 2230.7 2257.3 2305.4 2366.9 2473.8 2501.8 2547.4 2575.1 2642.8 2658.5 2651.5 2666.1 2640.1 2409.8 2501.4 2457.7 2218.7 2207.4 2206.5 2273.4 2326.6 2365.8 2427.2 2461.9 2509.8 2522.9 2511.3 2534.3 2664.9 2669.1 2 Current tax receipts 1326.3 1314.7 1126.2 1230.6 1078.4 1073.3 1067 1075.2 1084.7 1091.3 1009 1096 1098.4 1135 1178.5 1203.4 1336.9 1357 1392.9 1448 1517.6 1541.6 1581.3 1592.8 1637.2 1648.6 1632.6 1632 1586.2 1358.4 1450.2 1396.1 1162.3 1130.7 1154 1207.2 1252.3 1282 1333.9 1371.3 1494 1504.1 1494.2 1518.5 1629.2 1637
hmm it looks so much better in preview
trying again
Compare and contrast:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...nt-drops-legitimate-not-7.html#post1060992611
2001 2163.7
2002 2002.1
2003 2047.9
2004 2213.2
2005 2546.8
2006 2807.4
2007 2951.2
2008 2790.3
It would be a lot easier if you changed the numbers to annual instead of quarterly