Correct. The right to keep and bear ARMS is not specific to guns. It was created long before guns were invented.
Before guns it was English longbows.
Before the English longbow it was melee weapons.
"(2) Whichever
free laymen who have chattels or rent of 16 marks should have a
hauberk and helmet and shield and
lancea;"
"whichever
free layman has chattels or rent of 10 marks must have a
habergeon [aubergel], an
iron cap and a
lancea."
"(3) Likewise all burgesses and
the whole body of free men must have a
gambeson [wambais], an
iron cap and a
lancea."
https://web.archive.org/web/20210926102228/penultimateharn.com/history/armsassize.html
The earliest codification that I am aware of, of a right to use GUNS in sporting competitions and to defend one's home, was in 1541.
That is pretty close to the invention of effective firearms, especially in England.
Until the gun control movement:
a) stops violating our civil liberties, AND
b) stops trying to violate our civil liberties, AND
c) pays full compensation for all their past violations of our civil liberties,
I oppose any and all gun regulations.
If my above conditions are ever met, I could then support the "97 Percent" proposals with the exception of red flag laws, which violate due process rights. I favor yellow flag laws instead of red flag laws.
www.97percent.us