• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"You're accused-PROVE YOU'RE INNOCENT." Thanks Democrats. Thanks a lot.

Ikari said:
He can sue for slander then, possibly push for perjury if it can be proven in court.
Click to expand...

Mouthenatti's "accuser" has already contradicted her sworn statement.


The accusers are NOT BEING REQUIRED to PROVIDE PROOF of their accusations, yet they are being assumed "true", almost universally among the Accuser-crats...


It is KAVANAUGH being investigated,, based on ZERO EVIDENCE of ANYTHING, and the overwhelming majority of witnesses SUPPORITNG HIS CLAIMS...
 
Ikari said:
He can sue for slander then, possibly push for perjury if it can be proven in court.
Click to expand...

Double edged sword. He may win. Then what?

The fact he drags it through the court keeps the issue in the public forum. Better for high profile people at times just to let it die a quiet death.
 
ecofarm said:
Totally self serving creepy BS. Some of us would be unaffected by such an accusation. Because everyone knows who we are. If a man's house falls at the first stone, it's his fault.
Click to expand...

Tell that to a innocent person who was not given the benefit of the doubt...
 
beefheart said:
I didn't start a rant thread...
Click to expand...

This a rant thread that has a bit of truth in it.

Accusation =/= Evidence except to some folk... But plenty have cried out that Kavanaugh after decades of service is not worthy of a seat on SCOTUS based solely on an accusation.
 
Fledermaus said:
Double edged sword. He may win. Then what?

The fact he drags it through the court keeps the issue in the public forum. Better for high profile people at times just to let it die a quiet death.
Click to expand...

His choice then. Pretty sure he's not going to be left destitute. Actually, I fully believe he'll be confirmed to the SCOTUS.
 
Blue Dog said:
Tell that to a innocent person who was not given the benefit of the doubt...
Click to expand...

Sure. It's their fault. Build a real house and one stone will not bring it crashing down. Build a house of straw and you deserve to have it burnt down.
 
Grokmaster said:
Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....


View attachment 67241471
Click to expand...

They'll pay for this down the road...
Mark my words.
 
Blue Dog said:
Tell that to a innocent person who was not given the benefit of the doubt...
Click to expand...

Emmet Till comes immediately to mind....especially with theses kinds of accusations...UNSUPPORTED ACCUSATIONS...
 
Grokmaster said:
Mouthenatti's "accuser" has already contradicted her sworn statement.


The accusers are NOT BEING REQUIRED to PROVIDE PROOF of their accusations, yet they are being assumed "true", almost universally among the Accuser-crats...


It is KAVANAUGH being investigated,, based on ZERO EVIDENCE of ANYTHING, and the overwhelming majority of witnesses SUPPORITNG HIS CLAIMS...
Click to expand...

It's a testimonial, this isn't a court of law.
 
Grokmaster said:
Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....


View attachment 67241471
Click to expand...

So you think serious allegations should not be investigated? Interesting.
 
beefheart said:
I didn't start a rant thread...
Click to expand...

Still can't address the topic, we see...

I'm sure no one noticed the lameass attempts to try to hide behind your weak comments about the thread while DESPPERATY DODGING the POINTS MADE. :roll:
 
ecofarm said:
Sure. It's their fault. Build a real house and one stone will not bring it crashing down. Build a house of straw and you deserve to have it burnt down.
Click to expand...

“Attitudes are more important than facts”

Karl Menninger
 
Fledermaus said:
This a rant thread that has a bit of truth in it.

Accusation =/= Evidence except to some folk... But plenty have cried out that Kavanaugh after decades of service is not worthy of a seat on SCOTUS based solely on an accusation.
Click to expand...

There are millions of people in prison on the basis of eyewitness testimony.
 
Fledermaus said:
Has not Kavanaugh been accused without a shred of evidence only to have the mob pile on?
Click to expand...

Still not Stalin Russia.

This isn't a legal trial, it's a job application.
 
ecofarm said:
Totally self serving creepy BS. Some of us would be unaffected by such an accusation. Because everyone knows who we are. If a man's house falls at the first stone, it's his fault.
Click to expand...

Blame the innocent much? We should all be prepared to be subjected to FALSE ACCUSATIONS, or "we're guilty"?


Thanks for proving the POINT of the OP, democrat.

( I know, "you're not a democrat you're an 'independent' " which is the current "fashionable term" democrats use to try to hide their glaring bias. )
 
Ikari said:
Still not Stalin Russia.

This isn't a legal trial, it's a job application.
Click to expand...

It's being conducted exactly as I described; NO BURDEN of PROOF on the ACCUSERS , only on the ACCUSED.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom