• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"You're accused-PROVE YOU'RE INNOCENT." Thanks Democrats. Thanks a lot.

Ikari said:
Nope, I saw that argument for what it was. Nothing more than hyperpartisan tripe.
Click to expand...

So you finally admit that your stubbornness precludes you from admitting that you were wrong to lecture me about my womanly feelings.
 
Fledermaus said:
Dude.

The word "hysterics".

Do you know it's origin?
Click to expand...

hys·ter·ic
həˈsterik/Submit
noun
plural noun: hysterics
1.
INFORMAL
a wildly emotional and exaggerated reaction.
"the child has been seized with regular fits of hysterics at bedtime"
synonyms: hysteria, wildness, feverishness, irrationality, frenzy, loss of control, delirium, derangement, mania
"a fit of hysterics"
2.
a person suffering from hysteria.

Hysterical arguments are emotionally charged and exaggerated. Ruining Kavanaughs life and weaponizing the metoo movement? Please.

Kavanaugh's rep isn't ruined, and quite likely he'll be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice. There's no "weaponizing of the metoo" movement. That's just highly exaggerated, emotional charged rhetoric to elicit a particular response. It's complete and utter nonsense.
 
trixare4kids said:
So you finally admit that your stubbornness precludes you from admitting that you were wrong to lecture me about my womanly feelings.
Click to expand...

At no point did I "lecture you" about your "womanly feelings"

lol
 
Ikari said:
At no point did I "lecture you" about your "womanly feelings"

lol
Click to expand...

You're not very good at covering your bases.
I wrote about the bastardization of the #metoo movement by the Dems, and you proceeded to lecture me, by saying that my post was "a little on the "hysterical side."
It would behoove you to know, I don't suffer fools lightly especially when they attempt to lie in my presence.
 
Ikari said:
hys·ter·ic
həˈsterik/Submit
noun
plural noun: hysterics
1.
INFORMAL
a wildly emotional and exaggerated reaction.
"the child has been seized with regular fits of hysterics at bedtime"
synonyms: hysteria, wildness, feverishness, irrationality, frenzy, loss of control, delirium, derangement, mania
"a fit of hysterics"
2.
a person suffering from hysteria.

Hysterical arguments are emotionally charged and exaggerated. Ruining Kavanaughs life and weaponizing the metoo movement? Please.

Kavanaugh's rep isn't ruined, and quite likely he'll be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice. There's no "weaponizing of the metoo" movement. That's just highly exaggerated, emotional charged rhetoric to elicit a particular response. It's complete and utter nonsense.
Click to expand...

Nice Googling....

Do you know the origin of the word?

Or did you leave it off intentionally?
 
Doja9ZkVsAA53vZ.jpg



THANKS A LOT!
 
trixare4kids said:
You're not very good at covering your bases.
I wrote about the bastardization of the #metoo movement by the Dems, and you proceeded to lecture me, by saying that my post was "a little on the "hysterical side."
It would behoove you to know, I don't suffer fools lightly especially when they attempt to lie in my presence.
Click to expand...

Because that argument is certainly a little on the hysterical side. It's nothing more than emotionalized, exaggerated rhetoric. It's hyperpartisan tripe. The Dems did not weaponize the metoo movement.

lol

And calling your argument "a little on they hysterical side" in no way, shape, or form "lectures you" about your "womanly feelings". That's a Red Herring.
 
Fledermaus said:
Nice Googling....

Do you know the origin of the word?

Or did you leave it off intentionally?
Click to expand...

I gave you the definition of the word. Seeing as it was correctly applied, your Red Herring is irrelevant.
 
Fledermaus said:
I see you are dodging my questions...

Now why would you do that?
Click to expand...

Because it's completely irrelevant, it's just Red Herring. By definition, the term was applied correctly. So sorry that you're seemingly upset at English.

lol
 
Grokmaster said:
Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....


View attachment 67241471
Click to expand...

"Lock her up!"

Lol, the irony.
 
Ikari said:
Because it's completely irrelevant, it's just Red Herring. By definition, the term was applied correctly. So sorry that you're seemingly upset at English.

lol
Click to expand...

Upset at English?

No.

So, do you understand the origin of the word? Yes? No?

I think you do but are playing stupid.
 
Fledermaus said:
Upset at English?

No.

So, do you understand the origin of the word? Yes? No?

I think you do but are playing stupid.
Click to expand...

I don't think it matters for the context of this discussion.

But obviously you do. So instead of beating around the bush and being obtuse, why don't you state it and its importance as to how it relates here.
 
Ikari said:
I don't think it matters for the context of this discussion.

But obviously you do. So instead of beating around the bush and being obtuse, why don't you state it and its importance as to how it relates here.
Click to expand...

Is that a YES or a NO?

And after all the dodging you have done you are the last who should whine about "beating around the bush and being obtuse".
 
Last edited:
Fledermaus said:
Is that a YES or a NO?
Click to expand...

lol

OK, so apparently all you have is the Red Herring and cannot expound on your contention.

Ridiculous, but I suppose that's the hyperpartisan game we play.
 
Fledermaus said:
Beating around the bush and being obtuse....

Do you or do you not know?
Click to expand...

Do you or do you not have a point? If you do, please get on with it.

lol
 
Grokmaster said:
Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.

You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....
Click to expand...



Someone else was crapping on about this earlier today. Which little red broadcast talked about this last night?
 
Fledermaus said:
Is that a YES or a NO?

Not that I expect an honest answer at this point.

I'll come back in the morning and check to see if you have grown any balls. Figuratively.
Click to expand...

lol

Maybe by morning you'll have come to your point and can spit it out.

The historical context of the word is irrelevant to the modern definition. I know, deflection one of the 3 D's of the Trumpeteer, but this is rather ridiculous. If you have a point, just make it already.
 
Fledermaus said:
Why is stating a fact "living in a fantasy"?

https://www.boydlaworangecounty.com/penalties-false-allegations-child-abuse-child-custody-cases/

You are denying reality to no one's benefit.
Click to expand...

You think child molestation accusations in a divorce are common?! Your "proof" is a lawyer's advertisement??

Who are you apologizing for?


I wonder if you realize that your claim, your absurd and pathetic evidence and this whole routine is just about the creepiest garbage I've seen all year. Why are you throwing yourself under a bus for child molesters?

You assuming I supported Clinton, as a diversion, is also very creepy. That's seeking validation. You went into defensive mode and started ignorantly attacking, hoping I was the democrat version of you - apologizing for child molesters on political lines. Why is that your reaction to someone rejecting molester apologism?
 
Last edited:
Mr Person said:
Someone else was crapping on about this earlier today. Which little red broadcast talked about this last night?
Click to expand...

Oh...another of Mr.Alinsky's minions, we see.

Care to actually address the POINTS of the OP, or will you be pretending to be "far too superior" to answer?
 
Meanwhile, a SWORN LETTER from Blasey Ford's EX says she LIED about "never training anyone to pass a polygraph"....UNDER OATH, no less....has been released by Sen.Grassley. (Ooops!! )




But , I HEARD KAVANAUGH and his friends once PARTIED AT A BEACH CONDO THEY RENTED !!!!! Oh...the HUMANITY !!!
 
OscarLevant said:
As Testament to your own stupidity it's not about intelligence its about wisdom

so a word to the wise

Kavanaugh is applying for a job in the biggest League of all --- you know the old saying ;

now if you can't stand the heat get the **** out of the kitchen
Click to expand...

What heat isn’t he taking, an accusation with no proof, do liberal idiots want to start punishment for people only because of one persons accusations? And how does this being a job interview mean you don’t have to back up your accusations.
So if someone doesn’t like you they could just accuse you of something with no backing evidence and destroy you,? Y’all idiots are ok with that. The stupidity in some is just unexplainable!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom