- Joined
- Nov 25, 2019
- Messages
- 82,152
- Reaction score
- 21,753
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yeah. Exactly.
No, as your responses and denials clearly demonstrate, you look for "alternate" facts designed to give your preconceptions of a world-view that has been shaped by radical propaganda. And when shown the facts of that radial propaganda you slither away. I just showed you where your radical right-wing propaganda clearly lied to you about a legitimate unbiased source, and your response is...whatever. What a joke. Go ahead and keep clinging to that radical right-wing opinion passed off as fact.
You showed me a very poorly constructed website (I did far better on mine all by myself) by a left wing blogger purporting to rate news sites on an unbiased basis. This lady patent attorney or whatever the hell it is she does has zero qualifications to rate websites. It would be like YOU drawing some colorful chart and claiming it is an unbiased representation of "news" sites and putting MSNBS in the center. People would laugh and guffaw at it and rightfully so.
Subjective biased opinions do not count as facts. Just because someone has a website (and a bad one at that) doesn't mean they have a firm grasp on facts. CNN has one and they are out to lunch and come to think of it, their site really sucks big time. You'd think a billionaire could pay for a better site.