The left's constant conspiracy fixation is what's embarrassing.Truth is embarrassing?
The left's constant conspiracy fixation is what's embarrassing.Truth is embarrassing?
Colbert is on streamingThat's what we were discussing. Are you now choosing to be ignorant about this too?
You what to pretend it's not the woke trash. But that's what it is.Um, what?
Attendance has been dropping for years, but for some types of movies more than others. You really have no clue what you're talking about.
With you it's a safe bet.Great, then I'll assume you're basing that on facts or do you normally bet good chunks of money on baseless opinions?
Are you suggesting that that is special pricing just for me?Ah, so anecdotal data, cool. I'm sure Mercedes Benz sucks because I didn't buy one.
All I have to go on is your insistence.They are not no matter how many times you repeat it.
I was responding to you mentioning it cuz I didn't bring it up.I didn't.
I know you are but what am IIt is not, but that you say this to my response indicates yours most certainly is.
SureNo gaslighting required. Everything I stated is easily referenced, so have at it or post baseless opinions and get called out.
Not necessarily, since comedians aren't news reporters or news pundits. They can make a joke and depart from reality for comedic effect. As for profitability, there's been nothing released by CBS addressing what made it unprofitable.Current events can be funny. However they have to also be real. That said they have to be done cheaply as they clearly are not very profitable.
It didn't prime me for anything, because I saw that clip when it aired and saw it for what it was. What actually helped prime me to believe the accusation was Trump's seedy past and shady characters he had long associated with before his foray into politics.The point was there was no pee tape but the comedy helped prime you to believe the accusation.
That kernel of truth for those of us familiar with Trump was already there.Yes hence the kernel of truth. It doesn't have to be 100% true. If you made a joke about Trump being 150 years old and on his fifth wife who happened to be an Eastern European model that joke would land as an example. As I said most people have a drunk family member who acts out at all the family gatherings so it is relatable.
I thought Trump didn't make jokes per his own admission? In many of the interviews I saw on news shows it didn't sound like a comedy bit at all.Two points there. The birth certificate thing was flipped on Democrats but started against John McCain who was born in the Panama Canal zone. Second, Trump has a comedian's instincts and if I wanted to flip it and use it I would absolutely do so against someone named Barack Obama.
I am trusting the science and pointing out the problems with the study your own source points out. Did you not read your own source before posting it?So now you don't trust "the science"? This just sounds like flailing from you. Too bad you were actually doing some good discussion above.
Comedy is still edgy, and late night hosts are generally not the ones who push the envelope which often falls on stand up comedians. There have certainly been late night show hosts who changed the paradigm like Letterman, but he was not "edgy" in the way someone like Pryor was.Comedy is partially about pushing the edge of conformity. Comedy used to be edgy. The late night hosts are the opposite of that. Hence why I say they aren't engaged in comedy. It is performed as comedy but is about conformity. Most major comedians have been considered problematic or even had attempted cancelling in this age. Dave Chapell, Joe Rogan, Jerry Seinfeld and many more have complained about the speech policing.
If by "priming" you mean witnessing the evolution of MAGA and the behavior of its followers, most definitely.You've been primed to believe this and so it's not surprising you do believe it. Yet Trump has grown his coalition every single election cycle he has been in. That's a fact.
Enjoy the strawman. It has to be relatable even if it didn't directly happen to the comedian.
You are aware they didn't travel to Russia just to make that clip, yes? This obsession with conformity is quite comical, so thanks for that.I understand comedy quite well. I'll tell you what would have been good and cheap comedy they could have done without traveling to Russia and that would have referenced the supposed pee tape. However that would be real comedy and not an attempt to do pretend comedy in the name of conformity.
Make sure to send your suggestions for skits to your late night comedy show of choice. Good luck!You would have the host say they've got a secret pee tape of Trump. They managed to secure it and now they can reveal it to the world. The "tape" would just be surveillance video of someone dressed as Trump peeing in all the areas one goes when they have an emergency. Trump back turned peeing in a corn field. Trump back turned peeing in an alley. Trump back turned peeing next to the wheels of his private jet and so on.
It's relatable because most people have had a pee emergency and in this day and age security cameras probably catch a lot of it.
But the "joke" from Colbert wasn't about that. It was about trying to reinforce that Russians have dirt on Trump from a sexual fetish. Most of us cannot relate to that at all and even less so when it's all fake.
He is, but that wasn't the point we were discussing. I see you're now taking the off ramp.Colbert is on streaming
Incorrect. Again, I welcome you to make a fact base argument and present data to back your assertion. I know you won't, but the offer stands.You what to pretend it's not the woke trash. But that's what it is.
That would be a losing bet. I can back my points up, you cannot.With you it's a safe bet.
Nope. I am aware of that promotional offer and it wasn't just for you. That you chose not to take it did nothing to expand on your originally ridiculous comment of not being able to give Disney away for free though.Are you suggesting that that is special pricing just for me?
Nope. Research is your friend.All I have to go on is your insistence.
I never mentioned Disney. Please cite where I brought that specific company up. I did mention Netflix and Apple, but not Disney nor did I say they were an example of anything.I was responding to you mentioning it cuz I didn't bring it up.
Yeah, that sums your debating skills.I know you are but what am I
![]()
Indeed, and they have their own share of issues, but Apple is making the gamble on Apple+ because they can afford to do so. They're still in this mode of trying to build a subscriber base and not caring about profitability like the old days, but then again they have a whole hardware/software business to bankroll all of this.Apple TV has been losing money for years.
![]()
Apple Is Losing Over $1 Billion per Year on Streaming Service, Has 45 Million Apple TV+ Subscribers (Report)
Apple TV+ is reportedly losing more than $1 billion per year as the company is spending $4.5 billion on content annually.variety.com
Life without a functioning Congress.
Follow the money as they always say. Have they already paid him to perform, or can they let him go for less payout. They'd have to have someone step in and most likely pay them. I don't see him making it to the end they already specified.Okay. Wasn’t necessarily meant to be a provocative topic. I just thought the idea of him going after his bosses might make for good television.
Few people really care. He might get a bump in viewership if CBS continues to tolerate his childish behavior. It looks like suicide by cop to me.Follow the money as they always say. Have they already paid him to perform, or can they let him go for less payout. They'd have to have someone step in and most likely pay them. I don't see him making it to the end they already specified.
You seem confused. It's Trump who sues at the drop of a hairpiece. Look at his ill-advised suit against Murdoch and the WSJ.Liberals like Colbert like suing for the sake of suing.
If you find him insufferable, that's proof that he's succeeding. He's brilliant, a modern day Will Rogers.I think he’ll become more and more insufferable and CBS will cancel his show early. Hopefully they’ll replace it with reruns of Lassie or Ponderosa.
Follow the money as they always say. Have they already paid him to perform, or can they let him go for less payout. They'd have to have someone step in and most likely pay them. I don't see him making it to the end they already specified.
He has a contract. I'm pretty sure his lawyers have pointed out what line(s) he'd have to cross to allow Paramount to get rid of him without having to paying him.
Esp now. I bet they're [advertisers] lining up for air time after this. Knowing it will be the hottest late night show for 9 more months. Or less...so they may pay even more!People will be tuning in to see how far Colbert will go.
He’s whiny, petty and just mean. Hardly anything at all like Will Rogers, but I get why he’s so popular on this website.If you find him insufferable, that's proof that he's succeeding. He's brilliant, a modern day Will Rogers.
Whiny? Can you give examples?He’s whiny, petty and just mean. Hardly anything at all like Will Rogers, but I get why he’s so popular on this website.
Probably none that you would accept.Whiny? Can you give examples?
In other words, there are none. I expected that of course.Probably none that you would accept.
The left's constant conspiracy fixation is what's embarrassing.
Of course. No tainting of the anointed hero.In other words, there are none. I expected that of course.
You win the award for avoiding the issue. I asked for actual examples of Colbert being whiny and mean, but all you do is spout generalities. You would make a great Republican.Of course. No tainting of the anointed hero.
I’m sure Mr. Colbert appreciates your efforts at white knighting.You win the award for avoiding the issue. I asked for actual examples of Colbert being whiny and mean, but all you do is spout generalities. You would make a great Republican.
I see that you still have nothing to back up your accusation.I’m sure Mr. Colbert appreciates your efforts at white knighting.
My beagles would probably like me to justify why I won’t give them all of the dog food at once, but I know that no matter what I tell them, they aren’t going to accept it. Same energy. It’s a waste of time so I don’t bother with it.I see that you still have nothing to back up your accusation.
Your folksy comment is cute, but it doesn't make up for the fact that you can't back up your accusation. Either give an example of Colbert being whiny, or just stop responding.My beagles would probably like me to justify why I won’t give them all of the dog food at once, but I know that no matter what I tell them, they aren’t going to accept it. Same energy. It’s a waste of time so I don’t bother with it.