Why is the uncovering of the Epstein files so important?

[jaypatriot]

I understand how difficult any of these types of indictments are. I still think there should be investigations. To not do anything is a true betrayal.

I don't care about public satisfaction, what I care about is people that have committed some pretty horrible crimes just walking Scot free.

The notion there would be hard evidence coming out of any investigation into the goings on while cavorting on that island is farfetched.
I highly doubt there would be hard evidence to indict or convict anyone who might have done anything to offend the moral consciences of those who want to see the rich elitists punished.

 

[Spock]

The clamor for the release of the so-called Epstein files has reached a fever pitch.
My feeling is the vast majority of those demanding to see "the files" want to see how much the GOP will be damaged by the data especially since the mid-terms next year are critical for the Democrats' success at the polls.
The foremost goal of course is to hurt Trump, the duly elected president of this country.
To me, it is all about political fortunes for next year and very little to do with "protecting the innocent" whoever they are.

Was there too much clamor when Nixon refused to release the tapes?

 

[trixare4kids]

DEMOCRATS shouldn't. They had their chance.

And they would have taken it if they could legally use it to bring Trump down.
It’s funny though watching the antiTrumps trying to squeeze blood from a turnip.

 

[Spock]

The notion there would be hard evidence coming out of any investigation into the goings on while cavorting on that island is farfetched.
I highly doubt there would be hard evidence to indict or convict anyone who might have done anything to offend the moral consciences of those who want to see the rich elitists punished.

Why would your doubts be persuasive to anyone?

 

[Spock]

And they would have taken it if they could legally use it to bring Trump down.
It’s funny though watching the antiTrumps trying to squeeze blood from a turnip.

Even pedophilia will not be sufficient for a true Trump believer to lose faith.

 

[trixare4kids]

Didn’t these files exist when Joe was president? Does anyone seriously think that if there had been anything incriminating against Trump he wouldn’t have released it? Democrats have been on a nine-year crusade against Trump. If the object were truth and justice, why did that only start once Trump became president?

The Democrats are so full of it. They know what you are saying is true but it won’t stop them from milking it until Trumps term in office is up. Only then will they forget that nobody cared more about justice for the underaged victims than them. /s

 

[trixare4kids]

Even pedophilia will not be sufficient for a true Trump believer to lose faith.

Lol, see there you go. It’s always the same old ad Homs, and fictional seedy stories with you lot. Have none of you lot possess an ounce of honesty?
Keep squeezing that turnip.

 

[daeler]

The notion there would be hard evidence coming out of any investigation into the goings on while cavorting on that island is farfetched.
I highly doubt there would be hard evidence to indict or convict anyone who might have done anything to offend the moral consciences of those who want to see the rich elitists punished.

So just give up? Don't investigate anyone that might have committed a crime?

Interesting flex.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Lol, see there you go. It’s always the same old seedy story with you lot. Have none of you lot possess an ounce of honesty?
Keep squeezing that turnip.

If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex trafficked young women, would you still support him?

 

[trixare4kids]

If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex trafficked young women, would you still support him?

Go bother someone else.

 

[trixare4kids]

So just give up? Don't investigate anyone that might have committed a crime?

Interesting flex.

They’ve already been investigated.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Go bother someone else.

Go bother someone else?
Are you playing mod?
How is replying to a comment you made on a public message board a bother for you?

If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex trafficked young women, would you still support him?

 

[trixare4kids]

Go bother someone else?
Are you playing mod?
How is replying to a comment you made on a public message board a bother for you?

If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex trafficked young women, would you still support him

You’re trolling

 

[lynnwinslow]

You’re trolling

You're deflecting. Why is that?
It's a legitimate question related to the thread topic.


If there was evidence that Trump had sex with underage girls or had sex trafficked young women, would you still support him

 

[Citizen]

I think both parties are going to have some involvement here

I think the right wing nut conspiracy theories started all of this and it has backfired. Grow up and take responsibility of your own actions

 

[trixare4kids]

So some of the anti-Trumps presume that his supporters would support a president who is a proven pedophile. Why else would they ask such moronic questions? Obvious trolling is obvious.

Seriously, we are onto why you lot erects haystacks of hate. Go away.

 

[daeler]

They’ve already been investigated.

I didn't see an investigation of Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton, When did that happen?

 

[lynnwinslow]

So some of the anti-Trumps presume that his supporters would support presidents who are pedophiles. Why else would they ask such moronic questions? Obvious trolling is obvious.

Seriously, we are onto why you erect these haystacks of hate. Go away.

Weak.

Would you still support Trump if there was evidence that he had sex with sex trafficked minors? You haven't answered a direct question about it. What about if Trump took advantage of sex trafficked young women? Would that be okay with you?

 

[Sidd Finch]

So some of the anti-Trumps presume that his supporters would support presidents who are pedophiles. Why else would they ask such moronic questions? Obvious trolling is obvious.

Seriously, we are onto why you erect these haystacks of hate. Go away.

LOL You elected a troll. Man, MAGA is so full of shit.

 

[trixare4kids]

Weak.

Would you still support Trump if there was evidence that he had sex with sex trafficked minors? You haven't answered a direct question about it. What about if Trump took advantage of sex trafficked young women? Would that be okay with you?

Post 241

 

[trixare4kids]

I didn't see an investigation of Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton, When did that happen?

How do you know they were not investigated?

 

[yankintx]

Ask MAGA'S

In the election campaign It was important

Now not so much

Its a helllfire MAGA'S created

Enjoy the heat

 

[lynnwinslow]

Post 241

That's not an answer.
That's just deflection, baiting and flailing.

 

[daeler]

How do you know they were not investigated?

How do you know they were? You said there were investigations already I asked you when.

At this point most people would provide links to the information. Got any?

 

[trixare4kids]

How do you know they were? You said there were investigations already I asked you when.

At this point most people would provide links to the information. Got any?

turnip. keep squeezing it.
If there was anything to have charged the group above with, it would have already happened. No underaged girls accused any of them with crimes.
Impossible to prosecute if one cannot get convictions.

Carry on with the conspiracy theories though if it makes you feel better.