- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 139,813
- Reaction score
- 97,575
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You are playing word games. No matter what you call the unborn but within minutes of conception science says human life has begun.
Yes, I'm aware of the differences between born and unborn. There's an entire list of physiological changes that take place at birth.
It's a distinct difference in the stages of human development.
That is all biology. Science is objective. Nothing in biology has anything to do with ethics, laws, or value. That is up to society.
In our society, the unborn has no rights.
Obviously, the distinction is recognized by all, even if not all agree on the legal status of the unborn. SCOTUS has decided that the unborn are not equal and did not recognize rights for the unborn. And our laws reflect this:
U.S. Code: § 8 “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant
1 U.S. Code: SS 8 “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.