Why haven't I seen one Republican put country over party, and condemn the Russian attacks?

[veritas1]

There's no denying that Putin launched a "sweeping and systemic" attack on our elections in 2016, as the Mueller report proved.

Why has every single Republican I've ever seen say anything about the topic, never once objected to the Putin attacks which help their side win, showing that they all are willing to cheat to win?

The Russians have been meddling since 2013. All the meddling occurred on Obama's watch. Maybe you need to be upset with him. Oh, and nobody cheated anything. You had an unlikable candidate who was vastly outworked on the campaign trail. There is no evidence that leaking Podesta's emails made a single person change their vote. People just didn't want a continuation of the Obama years.

 

[marke]

It's pretty simple. Read the Mueller report for facts on Russian interference. I'll consider any other questioning about Russian interference to be attempt to troll and derail the topic and not respond. Collusion aside, Mueller found abundant evidence of Russian election plot - POLITICO

I must assume you are completely unaware of the political bias against Trump which has fueled lies, false allegations and unproven evidences of alleged criminal activities against enemies of democrats in politics. Let me explain what the report you cited tells you and does not tell you while leaving the ignorant to make false assumptions on their own.

1. It does not say Mueller identified Russians who stole the DNC emails and gave them to Assange to release before the 2016 election. Nowhere has any evidence been shown to prove that false allegation.

2. It does not prove Putin knew anything about what some Russians may have been doing, whether illegal or not.

3. It cites as evidence of factual support that the company hired by the DNC to look into security breaches in the spring of 2016 claimed the Russians did it, although no proof was offered at the time, no US intelligence agency independently investigated the DNC computers for verification, and that intelligence agencies claiming the Russians did it were basing their claims entirely on the strength of the assessment of the single DNC security team claim alone.

4. It does not say what other DNC emails were hacked and revealed to the public, if any.

5. It claims Trump proves he was seeking Russian help in the election by mockingly asking them if they really did hack the DNC computers then could they help the US government find the 30,000 emails Hillary deleted after Congress subpoenaed them.

6. It does not mention that CrowdStrike, the security company the DNC hired to investigate leaks from the DNC, claimed the Russians had hacked the DNC computers prior to June 2016 and that CrowdStrike installed security protections against hacking shortly after that. The problem with that timeline is that the emails Assange was given which he released were stolen by a DNC insider AFTER Crowdstrike has installed its protections, not before. So much for Russian hacking being linked to the Assange release.

The piece you posted is just another crappy democrat propagandist rag, not worth the trouble of reading.