Why haven't I seen one Republican put country over party, and condemn the Russian attacks?

[Craig234]

whom?

They're still secret. That's why people are worried about trump ordering the intelligence agencies to give all the info to Barr, with Putin really wanting to find out who.

 

[Frigidweirdo]

There's no denying that Putin launched a "sweeping and systemic" attack on our elections in 2016, as the Mueller report proved.

Why has every single Republican I've ever seen say anything about the topic, never once objected to the Putin attacks which help their side win, showing that they all are willing to cheat to win?

Or why haven't they criticized Trump for supporting Kim Jong-Un's attack on Biden?

Who do they think is more the enemy of the US? Kim or Biden?

 

[Craig234]

Didn't the Russian interference occur under President Obama's watch? Maybe Republicans are being silent to avoid bringing up that fact.

LOL. Republicans hate to criticize Obama for anything. Just like lions ignore zebras because they hate to bother them.

I am not a Republican and I condemn the Russian interference in our elections.

You do realize that sort of makes my point. But good to hear.

 

[Craig234]

Or why haven't they criticized Trump for supporting Kim Jong-Un's attack on Biden?

Who do they think is more the enemy of the US? Kim or Biden?

You do realize the answer is Biden?

That's a cult for you.

 

[Frigidweirdo]

You do realize the answer is Biden?

That's a cult for you.

And such an answer would then ask more questions. Like why they think an American is more of a threat than a North Korean dictator, and what they think "American" is.

 

[ataraxia]

Didn't the Russian interference occur under President Obama's watch? Maybe Republicans are being silent to avoid bringing up that fact.

I am not a Republican and I condemn the Russian interference in our elections.

Trump had threatened to question the election and even threatened violence if he lost (remember the ominous reference to the “second amendment people?”). Obama was pretty sure that Americans couldn’t be THAT stupid and deplorable to vote for such an obvious con man, regardless of Russian propaganda. So he really wanted to keep things low key until Hillary won. Can you imagine Carl Tuckerson and Sean Hannity if Obama started saying the Russians all their talking points were being supported by Russian propaganda?

But clearly he miscalculated.

 

[AlphaOmega]

They have nothing to say...

Obama was in charge not republicans. Please tell us what he said about russia hacking our elections.

 

[JackA]

There's no denying that Putin launched a "sweeping and systemic" attack on our elections in 2016, as the Mueller report proved.

Why has every single Republican I've ever seen say anything about the topic, never once objected to the Putin attacks which help their side win, showing that they all are willing to cheat to win?

I assume you mean Republicans holding political office. The reason is fear of Trump getting them primaried by turning his base against them.

 

[Craig234]

I assume you mean Republicans holding political office.

No, I mean people who support Republicans. Like posters here.

 

[JackA]

No, I mean people who support Republicans. Like posters here.

Posters here a breed apart. Polls show lots of ordinary Republicans believe Russia stuck its nose in the election, and many Republicans have turned against Trump for one reason or another.

 

[Craig234]

Obama was in charge not republicans. Please tell us what he said about russia hacking our elections.

The topic is that I haven't seen one Republican condemn Putin's attacks which benefited them, not Obama deflecting.

 

[Fledermaus]

That's Republican politicians.

I haven't seen any Republican posters condemn the Russian attacks on our election.

Open your eyes.

 

[Craig234]

Posters here a breed apart. Polls show lots of ordinary Republicans believe Russia stuck its nose in the election, and many Republicans have turned against Trump for one reason or another.

I should clarify, not one trump supporter. Not talking about Republicans who are against trump - they will condemn the interference. I don't even see the trumpistas acknowledge it - but I guess they could and not condemn it. Let's see their condemnation and demands for trump to protect our elections. They don't, since it helps them win.

 

[ocean515]

That's Republican politicians.

I haven't seen any Republican posters condemn the Russian attacks on our election.

Can't speak for all Republicans, but it's likely a matter of degrees.

Based on the evidence, what Hillary and her deep state partners in government, along with the CIA and FBI, did, and have been doing, represents a clear and present danger to the country.

I understand that extreme partisanship would cloud the ability to understand that, and warp reality to such an extreme extent, a blindness to condemnation is likely occur.

For example, I haven't seen extreme ideologues condemn what Hillary and her partners did, and have been doing, since the President announced his intent to seek the office of President.

 

[Craig234]

Open your eyes.

Garbage post supporting the OP's point.

 

[Logician Man]

The GOP has done a complete 180 since Trump hit the D.C. scene. In days gone by the GOP mantra was 'Better Dead than Red. " The new GOP mantra is 'Party before country, even if the President is owned and compromised by a Red. "

 

[marke]

There's no denying that Putin launched a "sweeping and systemic" attack on our elections in 2016, as the Mueller report proved.

Why has every single Republican I've ever seen say anything about the topic, never once objected to the Putin attacks which help their side win, showing that they all are willing to cheat to win?

Democrats even urged Trump to condemn Russia for the "attacks" even before Mueller began to look into the democrat Russian conspiracy theory. What should Trump do, slap sanctions on Putin because some flaming leftist democrats claim some Russians bought Facebook ads during the election, some in favor of Hillary and some in favor of Trump? Putin said he knew nothing about that. Who is lying, Putin? What about the democrats? What did the Russians do, vote? No. Intimidate voters at polling stations? No, the Black Panthers may have done that years earlier, but no Russian has been charged with that.

Did the Russians stack the super delegate vote in Hillary's favor so Bernie never had a chance no matter how much democrat support he got? No, Hillary and the democrats did that. What specific illegal act did what specific Russians commit which so easily took down the wicked witch democrat candidate?

 

[Logician Man]

Democrats even urged Trump to condemn Russia for the "attacks" even before Mueller began to look into the democrat Russian conspiracy theory. What should Trump do, slap sanctions on Putin because some flaming leftist democrats claim some Russians bought Facebook ads during the election, some in favor of Hillary and some in favor of Trump? Putin said he knew nothing about that. Who is lying, Putin? What about the democrats? What did the Russians do, vote? No. Intimidate voters at polling stations? No, the Black Panthers may have done that years earlier, but no Russian has been charged with that.

Did the Russians stack the super delegate vote in Hillary's favor so Bernie never had a chance no matter how much democrat support he got? No, Hillary and the democrats did that. What specific illegal act did what specific Russians commit which so easily took down the wicked witch democrat candidate?

Nice job of defending the Russian KGB machine that every U.S. intel agency agrees interfered in the 2016 election, and continues to interfere in cherished U.S elections. This is the new GOP at work.

 

[AlphaOmega]

The topic is that I haven't seen one Republican condemn Putin's attacks which benefited them, not Obama deflecting.

There is no deflection. You haven't seen one republican condemn the russian attack. I pointed out that it is because Obama...the guy who was the sitting president at the time..went on TV and assured us we could not be hacked by them. Would you like the video? Why would republicans need to speak out when the POTUS informed us there was no issue? I'm not the one deflecting.

 

[snakestretcher]

Post some evidence/links. I'd even be interested about historical cases, but I'm talking specifically about the greatly increased efforts by Russia in our 2016 and later elections. Though yes, Republicans are interfering globally - they're supporting, apparently, basically all the far-right groups worldwide in Europe and elsewhere also.

Republicans/conservatives are conspicuously silent when America's serial meddling, invading and election rigging, especially in Latin America, is mentioned yet have no qualms vilifying political opponents domestically.

Nicaragua v. United States - Wikipedia

 

[marke]

Republicans no longer exist in Washington. What you are referring to are Trumpers.

They don't care a lick for this country. Their raison d'être is pleasing their wealthy corporate/oligarch campaign donors

All the greedy penny-pinching rich democrats accuse republicans of being evil for being rich even though many republicans will never be as rich as the greedy rich democrats pretending to care about poor people. They want poor people to think they care about them and to prove it they try to throw other people's money at them as evidence.

 

[marke]

That's Republican politicians.

I haven't seen any Republican posters condemn the Russian attacks on our election.

I have never seen anyone presenting specific compelling evidence to the specific charges of Russian collusion here in the court of public opinion but I have seen wild mobs of leftist democrats clamoring for a finding of "guilty" based upon nothing but hearsay evidence from highly questionable sources.

 

[Logician Man]

There is no deflection. You haven't seen one republican condemn the russian attack. I pointed out that it is because Obama...the guy who was the sitting president at the time..went on TV and assured us we could not be hacked by them. Would you like the video? Why would republicans need to speak out when the POTUS informed us there was no issue? I'm not the one deflecting.

/// Would you like the video ? ////. Yes. Please present the video.

 

[Craig234]

CNN: "Obama administration officials sought support from bipartisan congressional leaders to send a letter to state governors to urge shoring up of their defenses of election infrastructure. But, as reported by CNN in August 2017, they were rebuffed by Republican leaders..."

NPR: "After Election Day, Obama ordered the U.S. intelligence community to issue a public report about the Russian scheme. Once it had — and concluded Russia's attack was aimed at helping Trump and hurting Clinton — the United States imposed a slate of punitive measures against Moscow. In addition to imposing new sanctions, Washington also expelled a number of Russian diplomats and closed two Russian diplomatic compounds in Maryland and New York."

 

[marke]

Nice job of defending the Russian KGB machine that every U.S. intel agency agrees interfered in the 2016 election, and continues to interfere in cherished U.S elections. This is the new GOP at work.

That's the stupid story line democrats have been pushing for three years. It is a lie invented by democrats in an effort to control the damage done to Hillary and her pals in the DNC when Seth Rich gave the DNC emails to Assange to publish to the whole world.

Here is how the democrat mind works:

'We don't need no evidence to declare George Zimmerman guilty or O.J. Simpson innocent, and we don't need to look deeply into the facts which supposedly support the Russian conspiracy theory allegations, because we already know the truth and condemn to hell anyone wanting the see the facts first before issuing a judgment.'

Democrats once claimed the whole world believed the earth is flat but they refuse to back off the unsupported claims that "19 intelligence agencies" all agreed with the Russian collusion conspiracy claims before the investigation was even begun into the facts. There was never any unanimous support from intelligence officials and there were never any 19 intelligence agencies to begin with. It is all a democrat lie, just like the flat earth nonsense.