• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who do we believe in the FBI Spying reports?

Paradoxical said:
The FBI, DOJ and CIA are corrupt organizations. It is proven now. Wait until Barr gets done spanking them. Indictments on the horizon of the Resistance
Click to expand...

you sound like an OJ supporter. were you an OJ supporter?
 
Paradoxical said:
The IG report proved he was right. There was a group effort to destroy him. The report said ONLY the first FISA warrant was OK. Did you not know this?
Click to expand...

Gee you would ignore the “NO POLITICAL BIAS” in the IG report and the FISA surveillance affidavit was for Carter Page not Trump.
Page was not working for the Trump campaign.
 
US&THEM said:
Gee you would ignore the “NO POLITICAL BIAS” in the IG report and the FISA surveillance affidavit was for Carter Page not Trump.
Page was not working for the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

I would ignore that, because if you listened to his testimony he would have to see a memo or email or something that said "I am politically biased". He is letting others make that determination and I believe a third grader can see that these people were part of The Resistance.
IPW, he did not his opinion but even a fool can see that these people were maniacally biased and had the early stages of TDS.
 
Paradoxical said:
I would ignore that, because if you listened to his testimony he would have to see a memo or email or something that said "I am politically biased". He is letting others make that determination and I believe a third grader can see that these people were part of The Resistance.
IPW, he did not his opinion but even a fool can see that these people were maniacally biased and had the early stages of TDS.
Click to expand...

TDS doesn't explain anything much less everything.

It's entirely a concoction of the Putin-Trump Fanboys.

Because with Trump gone and without Trump you Diggers over there don't have Putin calling the shots any more either. And Putin is your number one strongman.
 
Paradoxical said:
What????? Are you OK?
Click to expand...

you sound just like OJ's supporters and lawyers (which is the same thing that mafia lawyers sound like). you basically attack the credibility of anyone that researches, investigates or prosecutes OJ or the Mafia.

you really didn't understand that?
 
Tangmo said:
TDS doesn't explain anything much less everything.

It's entirely a concoction of the Putin-Trump Fanboys.

Because with Trump gone and without Trump you Diggers over there don't have Putin calling the shots any more either. And Putin is your number one strongman.
Click to expand...

This Putin thing is so silly but it proves how much you guys just parrott what you hear on CNN.

So let me ask you. What personal knowledge do you have that Trump does good things for Putin?
 
CaughtInThe said:
you sound just like OJ's supporters and lawyers (which is the same thing that mafia lawyers sound like). you basically attack the credibility of anyone that researches, investigates or prosecutes OJ or the Mafia.

you really didn't understand that?
Click to expand...

Sorry but the FBI no longer have any credibility. Haven't you read the IG report??
 
Paradoxical said:
I would ignore that, because if you listened to his testimony he would have to see a memo or email or something that said "I am politically biased". He is letting others make that determination and I believe a third grader can see that these people were part of The Resistance.
IPW, he did not his opinion but even a fool can see that these people were maniacally biased and had the early stages of TDS.
Click to expand...


What about the FBI agents pro-Trump texts to one another?
 
US&THEM said:
What about the FBI agents pro-Trump texts to one another?
Click to expand...

I saw those before. I asked the poster to let me know what sentences are Pro Trump. Maybe you can and we will analyze whether or not they were "pro" Trump.
 
US&THEM said:
Thank you for showing Critical thinking is dead.
Click to expand...

Read the IG report and tell me if the FBI head honchos have any credibility. They are so credible that I think they will be behind bars some day.
 
Paradoxical said:
Read the IG report and tell me if the FBI head honchos have any credibility. They are so credible that I think they will be behind bars some day.
Click to expand...

I have read and understand what the IG report states.
 
Paradoxical said:
This Putin thing is so silly but it proves how much you guys just parrott what you hear on CNN.

So let me ask you. What personal knowledge do you have that Trump does good things for Putin?
Click to expand...

You inspire me to inquire: What personal knowledge do you have that Trump does not **** in the woods.

At the golf course of course. I hear he has a hellova hook.

Your personal knowledge would be conclusive indeed as it would wipe things clean. For everyone to know.


Be advised also I rarely watch CNN. I haven't anything against CNN, it's just that CNN doesn't fit my viewing times or preferences. You're new here so a welcome to you and I'd mention for your benefit I pointed this out to my friend the poster apdst long ago and he seems to have accepted the fact. You remind me of him so I thought I'd mention his acceptance of my statement in respect of CNN.
 
Last edited:
independentusa said:
This seems to be a three sides to the reports when it comes to Trump's assertion that his campaign was "spied on" by the FBI. The first is the DOJ IG, the second Durham and then Barr. Now I look at the three and who do I believe?
First there is the IG who is a nonpartisan. His report says no spying but some mistakes made by the FBI in one of their FISA warrants. Ever been inspected by an IG, I can tell you they always find something wrong, but this seems like a minor detail when the IG is saying that the investigation was based on the facts and was above board.
Then we have Barr, a Trump supporter extraordinaire. He is certainly not by any standards nonpartisan. And he could also be in trouble for stating there was spying when testifying before congress. He says that the IG's report is false, even though he really knows nothing but his wish to protect Trump.
Finally we come to Durham. Even though there was an appropriate DOJ IG investigation into the matter, Barr could not rely on that report to say as he and Trump wanted, so he hand picked Durham. Durham again can not be considered as nonpartisan as he was Barr's choice and Barr would not pick anyone who would not give him the answers he wanted. Of course to no one's surprise the hand picked choice of Barr again does not agree with the IG and You can be assured his report will say there was "spying".
So who should I believe, the one person who is nonpartisan and does this for a living, the hand picked partisan investagator, or the Barr, both partisan and acting as Trump's lawyer rather than the AG? I think I will stick to the DOJ IG, but of course all of the Trumpsters will believe Barr and his hand picked crony
Click to expand...

The left and the FBI seem to be making an argument that investigations are not spying, even when the investigations use spy technology.
 
Moderate Right said:
The left and the FBI seem to be making an argument that investigations are not spying, even when the investigations use spy technology.
Click to expand...

Are you one of those advocating that we should trust the Russian version of events over the FBI, CIA and military intelligence agencies?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom