• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'White Lives Don't Matter' says Cambridge Academic

The OP is about what some foreign left wing looney said.

It doesn't mean anything to Americans.
 
I've no doubt that a percentage of terror threats in this country are returning jihadis...Only one in 10 jihadis returning from Syria prosecuted, figures reveal | The Independent


and that there is a massive Islamic threat within this nation...http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/terrorism-uk-number-suspects-tops-40000-after-mi5-rechecks-its-list

No **** sherlock... tell us something we didn't know and haven't been discussing before your arrival.

~ BLM have even started tweeting antisemitic stuff ~

hahahahaha! Your new "bezzie mate" is one of the biggest anti-semites on this forum.

That's often the trouble with the alt-right internationally - who you hate and tell lies about changes depending on the country you're from..


It's not exactly clear what you want me to tell you that you shouldn't already know.

Simple really - you say there are 40,000 radicals in response to a discussion about refugees. Are you saying all those 40,000 are radicals or not? If not - why did you invite yourself into that discussion?
 
Except you are not really an unbiased voice here and really do not know whether or not she is an expert, her placement and professor title seriously indicates that she is an expert.

Don't forget she only got promoted to professor for political reasons. Look at it this way ...it wasn't a bright move to expose her racism was it? The short term promotion will not make up for the fact she's not going to be on a lot of invites.She is a racist, end of.
 
The OP is about what some foreign left wing looney said.

It doesn't mean anything to Americans.

You've probably got similar types with the same views in your education system...look at ecofarm.:lamo
 
The OP is about what some foreign left wing looney said.

It doesn't mean anything to Americans.

And that is why this thread is in the Europe section and was made about UK events.
 
Your track record on grooming gangs speaks for itself.

And your track record on it also speaks for itself. Or are you finally become informed enough to realizing that your claim "that 84% of people convicted of grooming children in the UK were Muslims was" totally untrue?
 
And what about the Pakistani grooming gangs? Some of the men involved were asylum seekers. How many white children did they rape? Anybody bother to count? That might be a more important task to undertake for the sake of atonement and building a better UK, than protesting and rioting over the subnormal from Minneapolis.

Your track record on grooming gangs speaks for itself.

Right on cue - when you are losing you resort to lying about other posters.
 
Then you will be able to prove to use this is a nazi salute because the Sieg Heil nazi salute was standing with the raised arm. Kneeling nazi salute with the hands behind their back to indicate hands tied behinds the back is not a nazi salute, another :bs dogwhistle.
Lol that poster is serious, thats hilarious. :lamo
 
And there we have it writ large...Marxists seeing humanity as the problem...it's not their crazy ideas, it's humanity that's the problem.

Nope. Not even close.
 
Your track record on grooming gangs speaks for itself.
Care to elaborate?

Let's see if you actually have the cojones to accuse anyone here outright of excusing grooming gangs.

Knowing what you're made of, I guess nobody here is holding their breath though.
 
There was nothing terribly wrong with a Marxist society, the only problem was human nature, we humans are not able to live in a society where happiness trumps constant greed.
The difference between capitalism and Marxism is that capitalism founds on people being exploited by other people.

In Marxism it's the other way round.

:mrgreen:
 
It's simply a mixture of the two competing ideologies of a group that Churchill wrote about in 1920. His article has been excoriated by modern critics as being antisemitic. The capitalists were at odds with the Marxists in Churchill's era, but they may have figured out that marrying the two results in what they were after all along, which was money and power. The Marxist ideologues don't mind taking money under the table from the capitalists, after all, they're nitwits who can't create wealth. And because Marxism retards society as people become more tribal and obsessed with impossible egalitarian ideals, the capitalists end up with less opposition to their internationalism.
:lamo:lamo:lamo
 
Care to elaborate?

Let's see if you actually have the cojones to accuse anyone here outright of excusing grooming gangs.

Knowing what you're made of, I guess nobody here is holding their breath though.

You yourself lied about the Cologne sex assault spree that occurred. You've also lied when you said there was no police cover up. Imagine that, one subversive shilling for another subversive. 'What goes round comes round'.
 
Right on cue - when you are losing you resort to lying about other posters.

You
- posted false information about grooming gangs
- became irate when I posted about foreign doctors in the UK being unqualified to practice medicine
- lied about Sadiq Khan's ties to radical Muslim Louis Farrakhan

Go on. Say you didn't.
 
And your track record on it also speaks for itself. Or are you finally become informed enough to realizing that your claim "that 84% of people convicted of grooming children in the UK were Muslims was" totally untrue?

I believe the statistic you're grasping for is; '84% of grooming gang members are Asian', or more succinctly, Pakistani.

British-Pakistani researchers say 84% of grooming gang members are Asian: 'It's very important we talk about it' | The Independent
 
Then you will be able to prove to use this is a nazi salute because the Sieg Heil nazi salute was standing with the raised arm. Kneeling nazi salute with the hands behind their back to indicate hands tied behinds the back is not a nazi salute, another :bs dogwhistle.

I think you've aptly demonstrated that the left have no sense of humor.
 
There was nothing terribly wrong with a Marxist society, the only problem was human nature, we humans are not able to live in a society where happiness trumps constant greed.

IOW, Marxism doesn't work. Thank you for that Peter King.
 
I believe the statistic you're grasping for is; '84% of grooming gang members are Asian', or more succinctly, Pakistani.

British-Pakistani researchers say 84% of grooming gang members are Asian: 'It's very important we talk about it' | The Independent

Yeah, except that is not what you said and kept defending even after I and others pointed it out to you. You kept claiming it was true that 84% of child groomers in the UK were muslims. Please do not try to insult our memory because unlike you, we did not forget your claims.
 
I think you've aptly demonstrated that the left have no sense of humor.

No, the left just realizing when something is not funny, Nazi analogies for example used to "jest/joke" are not funny or acceptable.
 
The only reason Gopal is at Cambridge and thus 'matters' is because she isn't white, but she lives in a white country that seeks to promote minorities for the sake of being inclusive. Had Gopal stayed in India, her identity wouldn't grant her any special treatment or qualifications, as racial diversity doesn't exist in India. I'm so tired of mediocre people like Gopal being given a platform just because they're a minority who is willing to complain about the majority in order to receive attention. People who use phrases like 'abolish whiteness' while enjoying a higher standard of living in a white country should just be sent packing elsewhere.

Those that make these claims just don't understand that the freedoms they have to complain, to speak out, to protest, to pursue their chosen careers and take political extreme positions are all made available because of the founding fathers, the many who have fought and died to form and defend the nation and its constitution. So when they succeed in their crazed liberal, left wing socialist campaign they don't understand they are gong to loose those freedoms.
 
Yeah, except that is not what you said and kept defending even after I and others pointed it out to you. You kept claiming it was true that 84% of child groomers in the UK were muslims. Please do not try to insult our memory because unlike you, we did not forget your claims.

Grooming gangs tend to victimize dozens and sometimes hundreds of children, which the average lone groomer doesn't. Grooming gangs are more of a danger for that reason. But besides that, I didn't lie anyway. The article I based my thread on said that 84% of men convicted of child grooming since 2005 were Asian.

The vast majority of men convicted of grooming young white girls – 84 per cent – are of Asian origin, according to a report to be published this week.

The study by the renowned counter-extremism think-tank Quilliam says that of these, seven in ten are believed to be of Pakistani-Muslim heritage.

Asian gangs have deliberately abused white girls because they hold entrenched racist attitudes towards them as being ‘easy targets’ for sex, according to the report, which is based on the testimonies of convicted Asian men during court hearings.

The study – likely to provoke controversy – is written by two British Pakistani authors, who say they hope it will encourage their community to ‘take responsibility’.


https://www.debatepolitics.com/euro...ex-grooming-cases.html?highlight=84%+grooming

Where was the lie? I stated what was printed online by a news organization.
 
Those that make these claims just don't understand that the freedoms they have to complain, to speak out, to protest, to pursue their chosen careers and take political extreme positions are all made available because of the founding fathers, the many who have fought and died to form and defend the nation and its constitution. So when they succeed in their crazed liberal, left wing socialist campaign they don't understand they are gong to loose those freedoms.

Precisely. And how privileged is this Indian woman to be allowed to teach her radical views to the white children whose parents pay her salary? A white person would never be permitted to teach Marxist hateful filth in India, while claiming their minority status in India makes them a victim of prejudice.
 
No, the left just realizing when something is not funny, Nazi analogies for example used to "jest/joke" are not funny or acceptable.

There's probably already law against comedy in the Netherlands. We must not offend the 3% of Netherlands that is gay, black or jewish!
 
No I'm not. Only raging idiots with piss poor loser parents attempt to fight history. I mean this is dumb on a planetary scale. Lefties are quite literally the dumbest humans that have been spawned since we discovered fire.

Nope, those would be the followers of Donald Trump.

Considering that conservatives have been trying to fight history since at least 1865, your comment is rather ironic.
 
Back
Top Bottom