Beowulf
Banned
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
- Messages
- 2,096
- Reaction score
- 274
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
I actually know about guns and that is one nice rifle. No, no ban on those or an SKS
So what are you suggesting banning?
I actually know about guns and that is one nice rifle. No, no ban on those or an SKS
So what are you suggesting banning?
AR15's AK47 and other pistol grip assault weapons
But not Browning M1918s? They have no pistol grips.
It's a .30-06 semi auto rifle.I'm not sure what that one is.
I guess the question is: What can be considered an assault rifle?I guess ban any weapon that can be considered an assault rifle. I don't think the mini is considered one.
It's a .30-06 semi auto rifle.
I guess the question is: What can be considered an assault rifle?
I always thought an assault rifle was one with a pistol grip, much easier to use if engaging an enemy at close range
The M1 Garand has no pistol grip. General George Patton called it "the greatest battle implement ever devised". It's a semi-auto .30-06. I actually wish I had one, but they've gotten pretty expensive.
My boyfriend has a German Mauser, 8mm I believe I fired it a couple of times and it almost dislocated my shoulder! Never fired a Garand
Have your boyfriend get you a Ruger 10/22 or a Marlin 795. They're great guns to learn on, and they won't hurt your shoulder.
PS - I want a 8mm Mauser!
Thanks for the tip. I'll tell him. One gun he has is a collectors item now, it's a Remington "Nylon 66" .22 I've fired that one and it's smooth, doesn't hurt at all.![]()
.22 is what I've taught all my kiddos on. You don't have to worry about recoil and can concentrate on proper rifle handling.
I'm glad you and your boyfriend are shooters. We need more of us these days.
Its a bit of a complex issue. Banning guns isn't gonna do anything, as it would violate the 2nd amendment. Maybe diagnosing and institutionalizing mentally ill or unstable people?
Its a bit of a complex issue. Banning guns isn't gonna do anything, as it would violate the 2nd amendment. Maybe diagnosing and institutionalizing mentally ill or unstable people?
but refuse to consider the much more researched history about the institutionalization of the mentally ill. In fact institutionalization comes with far more undue consequences to society, the tax payer, and the individual institutionalized than any gun control legislation ever could.
These people are not mentally ****ing ill, they're domestic ****ing terrorists...
You're leaving out the most important part: the last time mental illness was politicized it led to sterilization and sometimes even euthanization... and the regime it was carried out under was that of Adolf Hitler's...
I wasn’t leaving that out, but uh, that was the United States and largely did not stop until the 1960s. In many ways, our country still finds ways to do it. In my state, after a federal lawsuit to revamp the institution holding developmentally, intellectually and some mentally ill, disabled people—we had articles from parents whose first step was to involuntarily sterilize their adult children. That was 1990.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro