• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Mark Judge, the witness to Kavanaugh's attempted rape, had to say about women’s sexuality

Speak for yourself. I was once a normal high school kid, we got drunk a lot, told a lot of dirty jokes and all that goes with it, but I never attempted to commit rape, nor do I know anyone that did.

But, regarding Ford, we have an alleged victim who is going to testify to a fact which is in dispute.

Your rant seems to be attempting to mitigate attempted rape. Brilliant.

No matter, it's irrelevant to the situation.


How do we know? Maybe she hasn't come forward yet. Since apparently that is the MO of high school boys, if one does you are automatically guilty. And no, as of now, she is refusing to testify under oath.
 
No, it doesn't. That isn't what is happening here. I suspect most men in high places were once unruly frat boys, long ago. I also believe that the vast majority of them did not, nor would they, commit rape or attempt to.
When there is an accusation, however, we must move beyond assumptions, we must take the accusation seriously and investigate it.


You are implying that because of the boys will be boys in high school, because of that alone, we are assuming he is guilty.



Why did you make your OP all about it then?
 
How do we know? Maybe she hasn't come forward yet. Since apparently that is the MO of high school boys, if one does you are automatically guilty. And no, as of now, she is refusing to testify under oath.

I believe she is not refusing. She wants an FBI investigation, first, which was done for Anita Hill, so her request is reasonable, though if they dont, I believe she will, anyway.

No one is automatically guilty, nor is anyone saying that.
 
Why did you make your OP all about it then?

I think you are missing the point of the OP.

Thing is, when we are listening to Ford and Kavanaugh, short of absolute proof, it comes down to who is the most believable.

In order for the public to properly make that determination, all the facts surrounding pertinent parties must come to light, it should be based on being informed about all concerned parties.

My OP is just part of it. If anyone can come up with more info on Ford, putting her in the light that she deserves to be put in, I welcome it.

But it shouldn't be based on blind opinion, it should be based on her words and deeds, and opinions based on her actual words and deeds, as my OP on Judge and Kavanaugh, were.
 
Ramming Kavanagh through without a hearing or an investigation for Ms Ford will definitely not help Republicans

Furthermore, demonizing Ms. Ford frat boy style isn't going to be very good for them in the midterms either, so by all means PLEASE carry on, Rethuglicans.
 
Back
Top Bottom